Gas prices are still high, diesel is at a record high, and the reserve has shrunk more than 30% in six months. While the reserve held around 415 million barrels of oil in February, it now holds less than 285 million barrels of oil — lower than it has been since the early 1980s.

These rapid drawdowns of oil threaten the salt caverns' structure, says Samantha Gross, director of the energy security and climate initiative at the Brookings Institution, a nonpartisan policy think tank. As the reserves get lower and lower, the physical facilities can get degraded, Gross says: " You can damage them by pumping too much out of them."

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 63 points 4 days ago (10 children)

MORE MORE MORE

Let's collapse the oil energy system, so we can finally all be forced to transition to a cheaper, efficient, cleaner, and self-contained energy system like with solar.

Thanks Donny for helping the renewable energy movement!

  • source
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] 24 points 4 days ago (2 children)

    I mean.. maybe. I like clean energy, but people will starve too. I don't see Trump's government hopping on clean energy as a solution. They will blame and deflect. They will destroy all our national parks scavenging for resources. It will be bad.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

    I mean private planes will still fly and there will still be food that goes to waste. People starving isn't because of oil shortages but because the rich won't eat the cost and rather kick people onto the street. Now the fertilizer shortage on the other hand...

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 8 points 4 days ago* (1 child)

    OR the Orange Stain will invade another country. Isn't the USA so gosh darn quirky!

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 5 points 4 days ago

    This is what I likely see happening.

    Canada is selling a large amount of their supplies to China and anyone else besides the U.S. right now due to tensions. Alberta already has a separatist movement that has been quietly invaded by bad actors from various U.S. organizations.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] -3 points 4 days ago (4 children)

    If it were possible, why did it take fossil fuels for humanity to reach 8 billion people?

    Reminder: all of human history and technology up to 1850 was solar and wind powered.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 4 days ago (1 child)

    Keep in mind that most energy at the time was mechanical, not electric. Electrification as we know it, even in factories had not taken place yet. We didn't even know how to use solar panels for electricity generation, so at best solar energy was used to heat water. Windmills ran water pumps but were not powerful enough to run any kind of industry. If you wanted heaps of energy you needed to build next to a river and use the flowing water to drive water wheels or similar.

    Fossil fuels - oil, coal, gas - are comparably easy centralised energy. Easy to dig or drill for, easy to store and transport and then convert into mechanical and later electrical energy. You could have a coal mine in one place and the refining industry in another, power houses and industry in remote places even. Trains could run on coal and made long distance and large scale transport possible.

    While dirty, the industrial revolution would not have been possible without easily accessible coal.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment