While I do support Marxists and anarchists working together against imperialism and capitalism, communism and anarchism are not compatible. Anarchism, oversimplified, presents a world of interconnected horizontalist cells, essentially a world of petty bourgeois cooperatives. Communism seeks total global collectivization across all of society, to create a classless world. The reasoning for this is that Marxists hold to dialectical materialism as our worldview and toolset for changing the world, whereas anarchists do not.

This strikes me in particular because I used to consider myself an anarchist. Part of my growth into a Marxist was simply understanding how historical materialism works, as presented by Engels in Socialism: Utopian and Scientific. I recommend giving it a read when you get the chance, and really pay attention to how Engels describes the transition to socialism and communism.

The truth is not black and white.

The most effective lies contain a kernel of truth.

Conservatives are right in recognising the flaws of liberalism (which is conservative), especially when poor rural areas (dominated by conservatives more reactionary than liberals) bear the brunt of liberal/neoliberal capitalist economic policy.

The unfortunate nature of capitalism is that the proletariat have 2 paths that lay before them.

1. Descend into reactionary ideology (liberalism, fascism, etc.)
2. Attain class consciousness

"it lost on you that the meme rhymes or is parallel with memes from reactionary conservatives"

So no, of course it is not lost.

Because someone that is "reactionary" or "conservative" agreeing with you does not make you wrong, to think otherwise is dogmatic and reactionary in and of itself.

The better a grasp you have on dialectics, materialism, historical materialism and the greater your class consciousness the more the above becomes apparent.

"reactionary conservatives" are very often proletarian first and conservatives second. Unless of course they are petty-bourgeois or bourgeois "reactionary conservatives".

"To me it looks like when the news focused on the little damage during BLM in order to claim complete wreckage."

Completely different and completely irrelevant.

"Ignorant memeing ain’t praxis or revolution. "

No one said memeing was praxis or revolution. Communists aren't allowed to have fun?

wee woo wee woo fun police.

"Anarchism and communism (even from ML roots) aren’t incompatible."

Yes. They most certainly are.

Anarchism stems from petty-bourgeois individualism and liberalism.

The better you understand liberalism the more this becomes apparent.

Due to Anarchism's inherent foundation that rest upon liberal ideas such as:

1. Freedom of association
2. Individual freedoms/liberties being far more important than collective freedoms. (Which is ironic because true individual freedom is only obtained in the context of collective freedom through an individuals relationship with the collective)
3. Decentralized competing communes (as opposed to a united collective whole).
4. Liberal notions about individual/private ownership of the means of production as opposed to collective ownership

Need I say more?

Or will you actually read?

I recommend starting with Mao (as it's easy).

Then read Lenin, starting with State and Revolution.

Then Left-Wing Communism, an Infantile Disorder.

I wish you luck, but I'm certainly not holding my breath.