you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 1 point 1 day ago (3 children)

And my point is just, that valuing that utilitarian viewpoint over other things, is not a stance a lot of people consider ethical. It is a choice, to end up with that being the "end result" of ethical thinking - there is no single right answer. Someone might think that the suffering caused to an individual, by them being killed without consent, weights more than potential suffering that might happen in the future. Then we get to how we define suffering. And then... ethics are always a mess, with only increasing amount of difficult questions, and no "absolutely correct" answers to any of them.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 23 hours ago (2 children)

    potential suffering that might happen in the future

    WILL happen in the future. Is guaranteed to happen in the future.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments