If they could draw or make music, they wouldn't need a robot to do it, and they clearly want to but don't have the skills.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 25 points 6 days ago (18 children)

Has nobody considered the angle that slopping is fun? It doesn't make you an artist, nor an author, nor a musician. But it makes a thing at your direction and you can point at it and say "this vaguely resembles the idea in my brain". For some people, that's enough.

(this has been part 4 on my Nuanced Opinions Regarding AI)

  • source
  • hideshow 18 child comments
  • [–] 19 points 6 days ago (4 children)

    That's why the zeitgeist needs more time to settle on the perception of LLMs. It's a cool toy, but people shouldn't be getting it in their head that it gives them a shortcut to becoming a professional.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 6 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (2 children)

    You gotta understand what it's good for as a tool and realize it's not going to do your job for you.

    The problem is that it's utility is basically correlated with your skill on a given subject because you can't reasonably hope to guide it to what you actually want if you aren't already pretty skilled. Contrarily, the perceived "benefit" or "coolness" it provides you is inversely correlated with your skill but with like 3x the slope of utility.

    If you are needing to navigate a pool of text as an expert in a field, it's obscenely useful and the holes/pitfalls are super evident. The less skilled you are as a user the more magical and beneficial it all looks, which is scary.

    Edit I said some of that backwards . More skill more actually useful, less skill the more it seems useful and cool but will screw you up.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 6 days ago*

    the problem is that it's utility is basically inversely correlated with your skill

    I've thought this exact thing too, I'm sure many of us have. AI is really you get what you give, literally. If you're educated, well read, know how to write and interact and think critically and have some technical skill, it can be massively useful.

    If you don't you just get mental masturbation.

    Edit:

    It's like, I hate cars. I want them dead, gone, erased.

    And I can acknowledge their utility.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 5 days ago

    In slightly more than a day, I got a working save editor generated by my local AI, a Qwen-Next model. Given a couple more years of AI development, I will be able to have some really old and obscure games remastered.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 9 points 6 days ago (1 child)

    I literally havent considered that. Probs should. It was really fun for me for a short while, but I never wanted to share my creations or pass it off as my own.

    "Make a tank out of liqorice allsorts but have Big Bird hanging out the top using a stick of liquorice as a cigar" "hahahahaha thats really funny".

    It got boring fast though.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 6 points 6 days ago

    That was my perspective as well. Once that immediate novelty wore off I started to look at people still playing with it and wondering what they're seeing that I'm not.

    But I guess people like different things. Like I hate reality TV shows, but those are plenty popular.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 5 points 6 days ago (3 children)

    I HATE LLMs

    But it can be fun, a little part of the problem specifically for LLMs they are addicting. Image generation version less so unless it's for porn

    But I mean these things are great for shit posts

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 5 days ago

    LLMs are designed to be addictive.
    If you set the settings (that should be on by default) it will be more of a tool than something that foeces you to interact with.
    Examples:
    Don't let them ask questions if they are not needed. You prompt it not the other way around.
    Turn off compliments and ask for more negative feedback.
    Make sure it doesn't pretend to be human with feelings and actual personality.

    I found these pretty useful rules.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 6 days ago

    I think that the kinds of people who would find the lying machine addictive would probably also find gambling mechanics in video games addictive. Also regular porn can be addictive to some people as well. I'm not disagreeing with you, just pointing out that these specific issues are not unique to generative ai.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] [S] 2 points 5 days ago (1 child)

    If people got a proper art education they would know drawing is more fun.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 5 days ago

    to be fair, if the masses were educated we'd be on track to solve a shitton of our problems with that change alone.

    As a completely separate thought, different people can find different things fun. And one person can find multiple things fun. I know I'm not indicative of a typical person, but I'd compare making your own art to Factorio, and prompting images from stable diffusion (or similar) to Cookie Clicker. I've put over a thousand hours into Factorio, and I like to think I'm mediocre at it, but that hasn't stopped me from enjoying games like Cookie Clicker (I say "like Cookie Clicker" because the incremental genre has moved on since then but that's besides the point).

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] -1 points 5 days ago*

    I think AI can be great for this. It can make so many thing accessible to people that could not otherwise. Your example here is good and there are some legitimately fun AI songs.

    The key is being able to discriminate something you've done for fun and being a serious artist. The problem becomes when people conflate something they've done as a fun hobby as being worthy of sitting next to human created art.

    I've used AI to code lots of things for personal use that I wouldn't have had the time to complete otherwise. The difference is, I use them personally and don't release them as a serious software product.

  • source
  • parent