this post was submitted on 10 May 2025
19 points (100.0% liked)

okmatewanker

1243 readers
1 users here now

No foul language - i.e. French 🤮

Obviously satire, dozy wankers

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Kolanaki@pawb.social 11 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Japan and China just be lying about being several thousand years old, I guess.

[–] dylanmorgan@slrpnk.net 11 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Even if you consider each Chinese dynasty to be a distinct nation (I wouldn’t, but even if you did) there are several dynasties that lasted well over 250 years.

[–] iAmTheTot@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I'm curious why you wouldn't consider many of the Chinese dynasties their own countries, in a way?

[–] dylanmorgan@slrpnk.net 9 points 1 month ago (1 children)

The culture and history are largely consistent, including after Confucius the bureaucratic structure, which survived through many dynasties until Mao, and even the communist revolution didn’t completely wipe the influence of Confucius.

[–] iAmTheTot@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I feel like similar things could be said of many places in the world, but surely you wouldn't consider, say, the country of India to stretch as far back? Or Italy? Turkey?

Even sticking with China, surely the mongol led Yuan dynasty is worth separating from before and after it, if you're considering modern borders. Like, does Mongolia get the same claim as China does in that case for oldest country? It kinda becomes a fuzzy question to me. There's got to be a better academically defined way.

[–] dylanmorgan@slrpnk.net 2 points 1 month ago

India probably, yeah. Italy as a national identity didn’t exist until 1861, and Germany until 1871, and there are still regions in both countries with strong identities like Bavaria. Culture outlasts constitutions.

[–] Droggelbecher@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago (3 children)

There's an argument to be made that a new system of government makes it a new country. Like, the absolutist monarchy of France isn't the same country as the republic of France. Especially if the borders change, too. Detto for China and Japan. But even conceding that, OOP is full of shit.

[–] AnUnusualRelic@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Especially if the borders change, too.

Oh, so the US really only dates back to 1959.

[–] CheeseNoodle@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

Hell if change of government type is enough that makes the US what, 4 months old?

[–] Kazumara@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Detto

It's dito in English and as far as I know mostly in German too. Aber vielleicht macht ihr das in Österreich anders, näher am Italienischen? Hier in der Schweiz habe ich detto noch nicht angetroffen.

[–] Droggelbecher@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Meine Familie ist halb Süd- halb Nordtirol, also liegt die Nähe zum Italienischen nahe. Bzw vielleicht sogar zum Ladinischen (ähnlich Romansch), das sprechen meine Verwandten noch eher als Italienisch. So wie ichs gewohnt bin heisst Dito 'mir geht es gleich wie dir' und detto 'das ist gleich wie beim anderen', also ein leichter Bedeutungsunterschied. Ich find Dialekte immer sehr spannend, danke für den Input!

[–] Kazumara@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 1 month ago

Oh wow, dass es sogar zwei unterschiedliche Bedeutungen gibt, ist interessant, danke dir!

[–] Merva@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 month ago

There is an argument to be made about that. Not a very convincing one though.