A thousand upvotes? Is this reddit?
this post was submitted on 11 Mar 2025
17 points (94.7% liked)
memes
16067 readers
3083 users here now
Community rules
1. Be civil
No trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour
2. No politics
This is non-politics community. For political memes please go to !politicalmemes@lemmy.world
3. No recent reposts
Check for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month
4. No bots
No bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins
5. No Spam/Ads
No advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live.
A collection of some classic Lemmy memes for your enjoyment
Sister communities
- !tenforward@lemmy.world : Star Trek memes, chat and shitposts
- !lemmyshitpost@lemmy.world : Lemmy Shitposts, anything and everything goes.
- !linuxmemes@lemmy.world : Linux themed memes
- !comicstrips@lemmy.world : for those who love comic stories.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
What's the exchange rate of Reddit karma to Lemmy nothings?
Reddit karma uses a logarithmic function to determine the karma on a post. The first upvotes give 1 karma each, but the higher the number gets the less karma you get from additional upvotes.
This isn't even some theory based on observations, the reddit algorithm used to be completely open source so you can see how it works on github (or at least how it used to work 7 years ago).
Front page reddit posts with 50k points most likely have over a million upvotes in reality
Crazy that this is how I found out about this. I guess that's what I get for not being enough of a repost bot 😔
1,763.64:1
From 97 million active users from reddit vs 55k users from Lemmy.
Well, at least you won't find bots farming karma
yet
I didn't even know the counter could go to 4 digits.
I think I saw this meme for the first time in 2017
What's funny is that, in 2017, the ETH high was something like $12. (It got up to $1300 in 2018)
Now, it's sitting at $2000 and it's a "crash".
The lesson here is to buy the dip and then check back in 5-10 years.
*checks ETH price*
Am I missing something? I've been staking since the switch. I'm doing just fine.
I think crypto is good for transactions, not storing money.
Like, crypto in general sucks, but digital anonymous money transfer is almost impossible without it.
The underlying tech is actually very cool and neat, unfortunately it got co-opted by cryptobros and bastardized :(
So energy intensive though. There has to be a less wasteful way to do proof of work
Ethereum's been proof-of-stake rather than proof-of-work for couple of years now, so it's no longer energy intensive.
There inherently can't be a way to make proof of work lies wasteful as long as there are people who want to do the work. If you make hardware more, then it makes it cheaper to do the same amount of work, so people buy more hardware and do more work and more power gets used. If you make hardware less efficient, people just use the old hardware. You have to abandon proof of work altogether and switch it to something else that isn't inherently tied to energy usage.
Most of the 2nd and 3rd generation blockchains are much less energy intensive (although still more than a home PC).
For example, Ethereum could be run on the energy equivalent of a single wind turbine.
Iirc etherium is proof of stake
Correct. Proof of stake is much more efficient than proof of work, but electricity is still needed to run 24/7 the million validators securing the network.
What is an "Ethereum"? Some sort of subscription?
It's a pretty old cryptocoin: initally released back in 2015, and a significant change deployed in 2022. It was then when they changed from proof-of-work to proof-of-stake, which basically means that they don't use mining anymore to keep the network running. They use like 1% of energy compared to PoW coins.
Also they have some smart contract capabilities which I suppose Ethereum people think are important. But I've never seen any practical use for that stuff.
Still, I think Eth is one of the cryptos that actually tries to be useful and efficient in some way and not just a stupid pump and dump scheme. Turns out, nobody gives a fuck about that, perhaps?
Also they have some smart contract capabilities which I suppose Ethereum people think are important. But I’ve never seen any practical use for that stuff.
Anything you need complicated multi-party interactions for that you want guarantees on. Real estate escrow comes to mind first. Depository accounts with yield. An immutable archive of records. Multi-signature corporate treasuries. Whatever. It's programmable money. It's not even necessarily monetary, because smart contracts can just deal with arbitrary data.
Never impressive to see a technical audience shit all over Ethereum for internet points. By far the least scammy crypto people have actually dedicated years into building something real on.
Would be great if they got some of that out there.
Respectfully, I think it’s just you. Ethereum smart contracts are universally publicized and utilized in the crypto community, and it’s why people were/are interested in the project. Many other coins are built on top of this technology. It’s pretty foundational. If you look into crypto any deeper than just buying and selling it, then the topic should have come up pretty much immediately.
I reckon most of that already is. A real estate escrow smart contract is maybe 200-300 lines long in Solidity, depending of course on what it supports (contingencies and such). You may want to actually go look around, because there's I don't know how many millions of lines of Solidity already written. It doesn't all get as much publicity as NFTs.
The off chain legalities are the tricky part of a real estate crypto deal.
Can changing house ownership really be as simple as making an alterations on a decentralized ledger?
You can mimic any existing setup for tracking deeds and similar, or invent new ones, with the added quality that they can't be doctored. Once something is recorded, it's recorded for good.
Blockchain is immutable but legal contracts usually are not. They have break clauses, implied rights etc.
I suspect everything can be implemented correctly, but my doubt isn't technical, it's legal.
Think of a smart contracts like a vending machine. You can't just build one and start selling real things from it. Laws need to be followed.
You can program anything up to and including judicial oversight and interaction rescission into a smart contract. Not all existing laws make sense or have a positive effect on this ecosystem. Many have a negative effect, speaking from experience.
You have to programme reversiblity and authorise people who can make changes in advance. Decisions on when this happens are outside the blockchain.
It doesn't matter if laws are beneficial or damaging, they still need to be followed.
A cryptocurrency that recently lost a lot of its value
I can't wait for people to realize they're all in a pyramid scheme together. I'm sick of hearing bros saying crypto should be part of my portfolio.
If you can hold it long-term, it's a fantastic investment.
If you're a day trader that can't look away from the charts for more than five minutes, then crypto definitely isn't a good idea for you.
Ethereum is a petroleum based lube used in gay porn. When multiple dudes double dock during an orgy, that's called a block chain. The ethereum on their foreskins creates an immutable ledger.
So what's a hard fork?
That's when a couple of bros split off into a new room but you can still hear them banging through the wall.
This is what happens when you don't use crypto as god intended: purchasing medication from India and subscriptions to indexers.
Purchase Bitcoin right before purchase. Watch the spare change left over go up and down and imagine all the millions you could be winning or losing.
This is what happens when you don't use crypto as god intended: purchasing medication from India and subscriptions to indexers.
I'm not saying this is what I bought Monero for.
But this is what I bought Monero for.
No, man. People are sounding like these prices are fixed, when we've seen time and time again that crypto prices are cyclical.
Now's a time to buy. ETH is at a 50% discount. Your assets would be in a pretty good spot right now if you'd bought Bitcoin in 2017 when it "crashed" to $4000 per unit. I picked up shares of EZBC at an average of $32 a share (currently hovering between $45-$50 in a supposed crash) and XRP at 50 to 75 cents, currently hovering around $2.10.
What you do is invest, and then just forget about it and let those assets sit. Investing is about forward-thinking.
Now’s a time to buy.
Never is it a good time to invest in a ponzi scheme. It's just a matter of playing "Greatest Fool".
"Greatest fool" description relies on the precept of its utility or demand returning to zero in a near-future timeframe. If people have utility for "the thing", that won't be the case.
There is no utility really, for ponzicoins. You can't make anything from it. You can use it to make anything. You can't eat it. You can't hydrate with it. And you can't use the notes to summon military aid.
I suppose you can buy drugs with it. Maybe.
So yes, it's a Greatest Fool game.
Yes, for the limited subset of ERC20s or whatever you describe as "ponzicoins". Things that actually do nothing, particular not doing anything more than L1 cryptos but "this is yet another token", are not really adding any value. But I would be really surprised if you can name any more complex contracts than ERC20s (or ERC721s), which is where the work in the space actually goes.
"Work"
Yes, work. Smart contracts are designed, programmed and, if they're done right, rigorously audited for correctness. Then you have user-facing interface and everything surrounding that as well. Look at the documentation of AAVE, for one example.
And this isn't even getting into the protocol level (L1 or L2) work either. Bitcoin was relatively simple, Ethereum is not. They've spent years crafting these systems to function for PoS, L2 support, sharding, rollups, etc., at scale.
Smart contracts are designed, programmed and, if they’re done right, rigorously audited for correctness.
What do these "smart contracts" make? And why do we need to burn up tons of fossil fuels, just to have contracts like we had before?
And how is this better than a typical contract?
Bitcoin was relatively simple, Ethereum is not.
Both are simple ponzi schemes.
They’ve spent years crafting these systems to function for PoS, L2 support, sharding, rollups, etc., at scale.
And all that time, they are still ponzi schemes that do none of the above very well. We've had all of that in the merchant payment systems for decades now, all without the need to consume more electricity than many small nations, just to approve a transaction.
What do they "make"? They control for the risks in social economic interaction with potentially adversarial parties. Ethereum is proof of stake, it doesn't burn up tons of fossil fuels. And the contracts aren't subject to human interpretation after being authored, they're deterministic at the protocol level (save for the entire network deciding to revoke the contract).
Why are you making fundamental mischaracterizations of the technology while acting like an expert? What you're doing is dishonest.
load more comments
(3 replies)
We've seen time and time again that not all crypto prices are cyclical. Ethereum has been performing poorly relative to BTC. If you're just going to forget about it, then you should avoid proof of stake! When you log back in you'll see that everyone who staked was sitting on a musical chair and you're not.
Plus, it's run by a central foundation that bailed itself out when the DAO flopped. Requires attention at best.
view more: next ›