this post was submitted on 28 Jul 2026
41 points (100.0% liked)

Fuck AI

7748 readers
1503 users here now

"We did it, Patrick! We made a technological breakthrough!"

A place for all those who loathe AI to discuss things, post articles, and ridicule the AI hype. Proud supporter of working people. And proud booer of SXSW 2024.

AI, in this case, refers to LLMs, GPT technology, and anything listed as "AI" meant to increase market valuations.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 6 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] apfelwoiSchoppen@lemmy.world 6 points 54 minutes ago

Famously thought Apple would release a TV and a car for like a decade. I hope he's right but he's got a track record.

[–] mycodesucks@lemmy.world 22 points 2 hours ago

He's right about the AI, but "Instead they should really focus on Apple Vision Pro" is a really good way to make absolutely EVERYTHING else you say seem wrong too.

[–] slaacaa@lemmy.world 16 points 4 hours ago

At their very core, Large Language Models' costs run contrary to basically every model of selling software.

Consumers and enterprises alike have been trained to pay a monthly fee for a service, and while these services might have limits or strictures, basically nobody buying software expects to have a metered service, let alone one that's both metered and with hard to measure costs.

LLMs burn tokens at a per-million rate regardless of whether or not you get the response you want, or whether it does what you ask it to do. If you ask a coding agent to do some sort of software task and it goes off and spins its wheels in a loop, you're paying for the tokens regardless.

AI companies knew that consumers would never pay the actual cost of their AI services, so they have, for the most part, sold them monthly subscriptions with vague rate limits that allow them to burn way more in tokens than the cost of their subscription. SemiAnalysis found that you can burn hundreds of dollars on a $20-a-month subscription and thousands of dollars on a $200-a-month subscription, and while AI boosters will claim that these companies have "70% gross margins on tokens," there is little proof that this is the case, and my own reporting shows that OpenAI lost $20.9 billion on $13.07 billion in revenue in 2025.

[–] pulsewidth@lemmy.world 4 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

has been described by Politico as the AI boom's most "acerbic gadfly"

The AI boom is about as real as the Metaverse boom.

I've seen researchers and academics prefer 'AI spring' to contrast with the AI winter of the last few decades to highlight the change in research and development spending, without the 'successful market' implications of the word 'boom'. Can't really call it a 'boom' when you're losing billions a day.

[–] psx_crab@lemmy.zip 2 points 2 hours ago

SemiAnalysis found that you can burn hundreds of dollars on a $20-a-month subscription and thousands of dollars on a $200-a-month subscription

Not to mention there's millions of free user that will never pay for any token but still burn through token(electricity and clean water!) for stupidly mundane stuff that is achievable either via searching the internet, or simply asking human. Those are the money that can only be earn back via sneaky ads, else it's considered loss.

The future is rather interesting to watch, and i really wish i'm not part of it.