top 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 119 points 2 months ago (10 children)

If you, as a consumer, directly paid one of the illegal tariffs, you can get a refund via the shipper who acted as an agent for you.

For example, here's the form if you shipped something over the border using UPS and paid an illegal tariff to get it released from customs.

  • source
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] 44 points 2 months ago (3 children)

    Neat. I paid a business that forwarded the costs to me. Who do I appeal to?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 21 points 2 months ago (2 children)

    Depends probably on the nature of what "forwarded the costs" means.

    If the business collected the costs from you and then forwarded them to CBP while acting as your agent, then you can demand a refund from them or sue them.

    If you agreed to purchase goods for one price while also agreeing to pay a separate "tariff reimbursement fee" in exchange for purchasing the goods, you're probably shit out of luck.

    Various shades in between might be arguable or litigatable one way or another.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 18 points 2 months ago (2 children)

    Does this mean UPS is going to stop sending me demand letters for extra money on a thing I already bought, paid for and received?

    I keep wondering if they’ll escalate, but I’m refusing on principle.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 2 months ago

    Yes, technically the truth. In practice the vast vast majority of consumers bought from a business that imported the item. So it's good to highlight people have options, but the broad point of the post stands, that the businesses have the option of pocketing the difference and most of them seem to be taking that option.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 8 points 2 months ago (1 child)

    That doesn’t matter if you paid inflated prices on already imported goods.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 7 points 2 months ago

    Yeah, the comment conveniently seems to forget that most people paid tariff costs not by directly importing something, but by simply buying the thing at a tariff inflated price in a store.

    There's no refund for those, and that is where the largest part of tariff costs has been paid.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 49 points 2 months ago (7 children)

    We pay. Then we pay again.

    It's as simple as that and just as fucked up. Our so-called government does not work for us.

  • source
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 43 points 2 months ago (17 children)

    I'm not sure what other system is even conceivably possible in the general case. There's no straightforward universal relationship between tariffs paid by businesses and prices paid by the customers of those businesses.

  • source
  • hideshow 17 child comments
  • [–] 28 points 2 months ago (3 children)

    I think the best system would be not to allow tariffs to be illegally implemented in the first place. But I realize that's asking a lot.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
  • [–] 11 points 2 months ago (1 child)

    There were some businesses passing the fees on directly to the end consumer via tariff implementation fees, but unless you have something like that itemized on an invoice, I believe you would be correct.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 10 points 2 months ago*

    A business that passed 100% of the tariffs on to consumers via higher prices could still be worse off after getting a refund than it would have been if there never had been tariffs, if demand is elastic enough, so I'm not sure even that sort of data could resolve the question of who deserves what.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 9 points 2 months ago (5 children)

    Take the total tariff income, divide it by the number of people in the country, and send out the checks.

    It's the ONLY legitimate way to handle it.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • load more comments (3 replies)
  • load more comments (4 replies)
    [–] 40 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (13 children)

    Let's be honest. The highest estimates I find are around $160 billion in illegal tariffs. If we split that evenly it would work out to around $640 for every person over 18 in the country.

    What good would giving 250 million people each $640 do? For 99% of them it would be gone as soon as they got it. They'd waste it on things like rent, bills, food, gas money. Temporary things. Within a month almost no one would have anything to show for it.

    But giving a relative handful of large companies hundreds of millions to several billion dollars each? For them it's pure profit. Their bills are already paid. They've already used the profits from that year for stock buybacks to get their wealthy shareholders more money and divided the rest giving their executives huge bonuses. And now suddenly they all have huge amounts more profit almost out of thin air.

    It's money to invest in AI to replace human labor so the coming years can be even better, to do even more stock buybacks so that the people who own the most stock in each company see huge increases in their net worth, or do give CEOS a second round of yearly bonus. Months and years from now there will still be amazing homes, yachts, private islands, and new faces that we'll all be able to point to as the lasting good that came from this.

  • source
  • hideshow 13 child comments
  • [–] 17 points 2 months ago (1 child)

    Man for a second I thought you were serious and was getting my pitchfork ready. Bravo.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 9 points 2 months ago

    I mean... don't put it away. You should still take the opportunity to make sure it's nicely rusty and dull. We do need everyone to have them ready. That sarcastic message of mine is still describing what the government and corporations actually did to us. And they're not raping and killing their own kids. Well... they probably are raping their own kids too. But not killing or possibly eating them.

    Since they're now all in charge of investigating and arresting themselves and their buddies and passing laws to stop their own blatant corruption it seems that us stepping in with pitchforks might be necessary very soon.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (11 replies)
    [–] 32 points 2 months ago (5 children)

    I ordered a pair of boots from Mexico, they were shipped with all of the correct paperwork and should not have been tariffed at all. It added ~$60 to the original cost of $170.

    When you submit a tariff refund request they warn you multiple times that if your submission is rejected you will be charged $100 per submission. It can be rejected for making a mistake on the paperwork even if they find the tariff was applied incorrectly. I almost didn't submit for it, and a lot of people won't but I decided to risk it. That was a few months ago and I still haven't heard back.

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • load more comments (3 replies)
    [–] 26 points 2 months ago (10 children)

    Americans will put up with anything. Fucking losers

  • source
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] 13 points 2 months ago (5 children)

    It's ironic

    They have to work so hard to survive, and yet, when it comes to thinking, they're incredibly lazy

    I genuinely pity them, because I know that as a society, they're only in such a situation because they're beaten into submission and apathy

    They're placated by unbelievable convenience, having everything an hour's delivery away, and numbed to the fact that that means someone is slaving (I use that term deliberately) for their laziness

    The mental gymnastics to justify every part of that shitty, exploitative excuse for a society are endless

    And when they see other cultures, where we are actually free, they point and laugh, because they are too ignorant to understand

    I spend a lot of time in 'Murica, under duress

    I hate the place, I see the cruelty and ignorance, and I would gladly offer asylum to those who deserve it, but even amongst the relatively civilised, that's a small number

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
  • load more comments (3 replies)
    [–] 24 points 2 months ago

    Fines like this should go to the consumer, but that's impossible, so they should go into the America First Fund (irony intended), which be the seed money to provide the initial funding for all the social programs we need to start - healthcare, college/trade, student loan forgiveness, pre-k, UBI, etc.

    As we investigate and prosecute MAGA crimes, any fines and confiscations, which should be harsh (including the confiscation of entire estates of treasonous families like the Trumps or the Ellisons), should be put into the America First Fund. The level of the fund should be mentioned in the evening news every night. Rich people can take note of the Dow, and workers can take note of the America First Fund.

  • source
  • [–] 20 points 2 months ago (1 child)

    So we were all robbed. Again.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 17 points 2 months ago

    aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaany moment now....

    ... it's going to start to trickle down.

  • source
  • [–] 17 points 2 months ago (5 children)

    Those halftone rosettes bring me back to my printing days.

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 13 points 2 months ago* (1 child)

    I kicked a trumper out of my D&D group after I finally got of tolerating his shit. He thought Trump would be better for our economy. No regrets.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 13 points 2 months ago

    This is why I can't be angry at regular criminals, they're just mimicking the world they see at the top.

  • source
  • [–] 12 points 2 months ago* (3 children)

    They should go to Free Parking, and if someone happens to land directly on the square, they get the refunds. Life is just a massive game of Monopoly, ain't it?

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
    [–] 10 points 2 months ago (1 child)

    The civilised world has always sneered at 'Murica

    But now we look upon the disaster with great pity for those who have been unfortunately born there who deserve better

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 9 points 2 months ago

    Please and Thank You.

    I want better for us, and I'm fighting for it, but I have very limited personal power to enact change.

    The way "we" looked at those "third-world" countries when I was a child feels like how everyone should be looking at us. Our squalor is not that of unclean water (but that is still true in places) or of systemic violence by the government (but that is still true in places) or of lack of reliable food (but that is still true in places). We have cellphones and internet, cars and roads, and air-conditioning, so we should be happy.

    Our squalor is in the apathy and even antipathy a bulk of our fellow citizens have towards others.

    The fix is education and awareness, but the means of enacting it have been hijacked. How do I reach someone on the west coast to be kind when I can't touch them from the east coast?

    There was a post recently, and I'll link it if I can find it again, about Kevin and his truck, and how helping others builds community. Very wholesome. Community has been lost here outside of the uber-wealthy (they all know each other), or the "poor" who need it to survive. The "middle class" has lost the plot.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 10 points 2 months ago (5 children)

    This was so obvious that anyone paying attention could see this coming a mile away. I'm probably the unpopular opinion, but I think the government should have just not issued any refunds. I would rather the government get funds to potentially use for social welfare than to give it back to businesses. The only problem is that would create an incentive for the government to try it again for another quick payday. Some mechanism would have to be put into place to stop this. Take away the power from the president to issue tarrifs on his own. Which we should probably do anyway.

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • load more comments (5 replies)
    load more comments
    view more: next ›