top 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 100 points 1 month ago (3 children)

It doesn't need to be so, the asshole billionaires just don't give a single fuck about anyone but themselves. They don't even care about their kids.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
    [–] 82 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (9 children)

    Remember that Stargate SG1 episode where they find themselves into a huge underground facility that is under attack by external forces. Jack O'Neill accepts to pilot one of their drones to help defend the complex from a wave of bombers and is infuriated to learn that the attacker's bombers were manned while he believed they were unmanned.

    spoilerAt the end it turns out the facility was actively poisoning the entire planet, threatening to wipe out all life and the "attackers" were simply the people of the rest of the world trying to stop it.

    That is what the Amazon data center is to me.

  • source
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • load more comments (7 replies)
    [–] 71 points 1 month ago (14 children)

    Torch it. Torch it before its too late.

  • source
  • hideshow 14 child comments
  • load more comments (14 replies)
    [–] 60 points 1 month ago (32 children)

    It's in one of the sunniest places in the US too. 6.0 kWh/m²/day of solar irradiance. There's even already a relatively large solar farm in the same county.

  • source
  • hideshow 32 child comments
  • [–] 80 points 1 month ago* (4 children)

    Wait, it does not run on solar, even partially? JFC.

    edit: yep.

    Amazon has confirmed its investment in a massive gas-burning power plant in Texas, meant to supply up to 7.65 gigawatts of energy to a planned data center in Pecos County. Should it come online as planned, the plant’s 35 turbines would be allowed to spew 33 million tons of CO2 a year, the NYT notes, which would easily make it the largest single fount of emissions in the country.

    It would also be in stark defiance of Amazon’s stated climate goals, which center on reaching net-zero carbon emissions by 2040.

    🤦

    Does greed know no end in this country?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • load more comments (3 replies)
  • [–] 15 points 1 month ago (19 children)

    If I were king they could run data centers with solar and fans. No outside power, no outside water.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 19 child comments
  • [–] 47 points 1 month ago* (18 children)

    You realize they are for sifting through the massive amount of surveillance data using AI right? They aren’t for ChatGPT. They are for categorizing and watching every person on the planet 1984 style.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 18 child comments
  • [–] 29 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (3 children)

    that's my biggest worry, more data centers won't lower the cost of LLM tokens.

    The only reason they want so much compute power is to have AI agents watching and annotating everything flock cameras see.

    not just license plate readers (a raspberry pi could handle that). but everything.

    My paranoia is that in 5 years, if you protest, the police will come to arrest you with a long list of every "crime" you have committed: driving holding you phone, no seatbelt, a recipt flew out of your pockets... a long list of petty meaningless violations.

    and they'll have that list for everyone.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • load more comments (3 replies)
  • load more comments (14 replies)
  • load more comments (7 replies)
    [–] 54 points 1 month ago (7 children)

    Don't forget to use your paper straws people! It's the average person that causes harm to the climate, not businesses. Maybe we should give them more tax breaks.

  • source
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • load more comments (7 replies)
    [–] 53 points 1 month ago (9 children)

    It would also be in stark defiance of Amazon’s stated climate goals, which center on reaching net-zero carbon emissions by 2040.

    That’s not lost on the tech giant. But as Amazon spokesperson Margaret Callahan told the NYT, the “world looks different now than when we co-founded the climate pledge.”

    What the fuck? They looked at the world recently and said "yeah, climate change isn't as much of a problem as it was before"?!?

  • source
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 37 points 1 month ago

    No, they looked at the blatant corruption from Fatboy McKiddieFiddlers regime and figured, "eh, what's the point of pretending to give a shit. No fucker has got the balls to stop us from fucking thing up."

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (2 replies)
    [–] 41 points 1 month ago* (2 children)

    can we use some patriot missiles for something patriotic?

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 31 points 1 month ago (8 children)

    Net zero doesn’t mean lowering pollution btw. Net zero means essentially cancelling out any pollution by planting trees, buying carbon credits, etc. It’s possible to be the biggest polluter and also net zero as a company. If that actually helps the planet is another story.

  • source
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 1 month ago (2 children)

    Well, as long as trees magically suck pollution out of the atmosphere in extremely high numbers, and sequester it for at least a few million years, that should be fine

    Otherwise, we're probably fucked.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 12 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

    In case it was not your intent to point this out with sarcasm, for anyone reading:

    1. not all forests are created equal: new growth forests are simply not as good at long-term burial of carbon.

    2. carbon sinks only work so long as the carbon stays sunk, so if a tree dies and rots before it's buried, all of that carbon just goes back to the atmosphere, except a lot of it is now methane, which is MANY times worse than CO2.

    3. this means that it is possible for a poorly - managed tree to actually be an effective carbon source for the purpose of greenhouse gas emissions, rather than a sink, since a single molecule of methane can do the damage of a hundred molecules of carbon dioxide.

    4. the largest carbon sink on earth is not the forests, but the ocean, and that carbon only really has two ways out: back into the atmosphere, or buried at the bottom in the calcareous ooze. Now if you really want to understand how fucked we are, read up on the following:

    • Carbonate Compensation Depth (see how it relates to the amount of calcareous ooze being buried in the ocean)
    • Methane Clathrate Hydrate
    • Permafrost Methane
  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 25 points 1 month ago

    BUT it was ALSO create THREE whole jobs so it's WORTH it!

  • source
  • [–] 23 points 1 month ago

    Welcome to costco, I love you

  • source
  • [–] 17 points 1 month ago

    Shut it down.

  • source
  • [–] 15 points 1 month ago

    I'm so glad I never procreated.

    With any luck I'll croak before the worst effects of these decisions manifest.

  • source
  • [–] 12 points 1 month ago
    [–] 11 points 1 month ago*

    Amazon: "but but but! we have over 50,000 electric delivery vans, and we sent Capt Kirk to space!"

  • source
  • [–] 10 points 1 month ago (4 children)

    I know this will be buried but it seems Ai isn't worth anything really if these giant complexes are the price. Just straight up monetarily, who benefits?

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
    [–] 10 points 1 month ago

    Yay Texas the business-friendly state. As if billionaires aren’t raping the planet and all of us hard enough, the lone star state is always looking for way to pump their penises just a little bit bigger.

  • source
  • [–] 9 points 1 month ago (3 children)

    But the grid can’t handle EV or the “pollution” they create.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • load more comments (3 replies)
    [–] 8 points 1 month ago (3 children)

    “Growth and sustainability don’t have to be in opposition — in fact, our results show they reinforce each other.”

    Oh yeah, makes total sense guy.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • load more comments (3 replies)
    [–] 8 points 1 month ago

    It's all worth it if my plastic "made in China" hula dancer arrives in time so I can put it on my cars dashboard. /s

  • source
  • [–] 7 points 1 month ago

    Imagine the local government decides they can't pull water anymore. Like several nuclear reactors having to shut down due to low river levels recently.

    The picture of facility in vast desert is baffling.

  • source
  • load more comments
    view more: next ›