Numerous posts sharing an address purportedly belonging to Langley have circulated on X, with many users responding to a viral post that quoted Langley as saying Americans must “compromise” on their privacy.

Some shared what they said was a blurred image of Langley’s home on Google Street View, with one X user saying the “compromise apparently doesn’t apply to him.”

all 29 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 82 points 1 month ago

Put up a row of cameras across from his house and see how he likes it.

  • source
  • [–] 53 points 1 month ago (3 children)

    Remember when Princess Diana died trying to escape paparazzi?

    I'm not sure why I just thought of that. Hmm. Random.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 45 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

    I saw in the rich neighborhoods in the town where I live the landscapers use their trailers to block the Flock cameras for their rich clients.

    Must be weird to view people as a shield.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 1 month ago

    FWIW, I appreciate your discovery of this systemic issue IRL, and even moreso for sharing it here, for others.

    All in all, the number of "elites" who wouldn't use any of us as a human shield/prop/tool/beast of burden is nonzero, but it might as well be.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 41 points 1 month ago (1 child)

    This is TERRIBLE! RICH People shouldn't have to Compromise on Privacy! That's ONLY for Poors!

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 7 points 1 month ago

    You don't understand! They have to protect their children and their lives because they can be targeted!

    Poor people aren't real humans so it's okay. When they get targeted it's probably because they deserve it! /s

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 24 points 1 month ago

    oh no. Anyway.

  • source
  • [–] 21 points 1 month ago (2 children)

    It's evil to write an article about it and not post the address.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 21 points 1 month ago

    Oh no, he got surveilled?

  • source
  • [–] 15 points 1 month ago (1 child)
  • [–] 13 points 1 month ago

    Newsweek has not verified the address and is not publishing or linking to it.

    The oppressor class has solidarity.

  • source
  • [–] 13 points 1 month ago

    Hell yeah. Maybe he will get some stalkers

  • source
  • [–] 12 points 1 month ago (1 child)
  • [–] 12 points 1 month ago

    I looked up the address for the company that makes those shock gloves for ICE and it's a big ass house an hour away from me. Of course it has a huge security gate.

  • source
  • [–] 9 points 1 month ago

    Well, if he hates privacy then no problem here.

  • source
  • [–] 7 points 1 month ago

    They even play coy and call us sheep with names like this.

    I'm so sick of them and their constant greed. They are ALWAYS taking and ALWAYS STEALING.

    THEY NEED TO GO AWAY NOW

  • source
  • [+] 7 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 week ago)
    [removed by mod]
  • source
  • [–] 4 points 1 month ago

    The Axon CEO is Rick Smith. I wonder where he lives

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 1 month ago

    If he's done nothing wrong he has nothing to hide, right?

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 1 month ago

    "targeted" is very loaded language. i just see a call for someone to live by their words or fold.

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 1 month ago

    This is the compromise! The CEO is the whipping boy for the shareholders.

  • source