all 49 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 127 points 1 week ago (6 children)

There are pussy lips in that picture.

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 210 points 1 week ago (5 children)

    That's just your reflection in the monitor.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 88 points 1 week ago

    AI is used to train doctors in the future.

  • source
  • [–] 60 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (4 children)

    (It's an xray of someone getting done doggy style - the ribs extend above her head and the hips are either from another person or have erupted out of her flesh and are going for a walk on their own. Might be AI or photoshop, might be Xray techs screwing around, but I can't tell from such a small image)

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 21 points 1 week ago (3 children)

    Thanks lmao I'm obviously no x-ray nurse as I didn't see the head in the torso at all

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 12 points 1 week ago (2 children)
  • [–] 9 points 1 week ago

    (post-coffee, I tink the image is of a single person and has been touched up, there's some missing anatomy that would make it obvious and usually the heart isn't quite so skull-shaped as that person's)

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 26 points 1 week ago (2 children)

    Yeah that x-ray needs to be marked NSFW

    (Sentences I never expected to type)

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 19 points 1 week ago (10 children)

    No idea if the X-ray is fake or not, nor am I doctor. Corset/restrictive garment use if there’s an actual problem maybe?

  • source
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] 29 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (9 children)

    (hint: There's two people in the xray)

    (a revision of my previous hint: There's one person and a bit of photoshop in the xray)

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 16 points 1 week ago (7 children)

    Help for someone who can't see the fucking sailboat?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 16 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (6 children)

    It's two people fuckin'. Edit: Nope, it's just a retouched image. Teach me to comment before I'm awake....

    The distinct skeleton you can see in the foreground is presumably from a standing male (you can see what looks like an end-on angle of the shaft at the base) - most of the soft tissue is from presumably a female (from the overly distinct labia that's visible) bent over in front of them.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 1 week ago (3 children)

    Is she taking it up the pooper then?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 14 points 1 week ago* (2 children)

    So honestly, after staring at it for far too long (and having some coffee) I'm guessing this is just a manipulated image (but probably not outright AI generated, it gets the major anatomy right).

    X-Rays do kinda look like two people doin' it already:

    But it's really exaggerated here with the shape of the skull and blurring. The part that made me initially think Two People (besides seeing rad techs do shit like this entirely too often (don't do healthcare tech, it's the worst)) is here:

    which really looks like a rear image of a male pelvis but that has shifted/was moving during imaging (image is for comparison, I couldn't find a matching example of a patient moving during an xray):

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 14 points 1 week ago (9 children)

    So what’s actually wrong?

  • source
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 76 points 1 week ago (5 children)

    Well she’s got a spooky skeleton inside her, for one

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 1 week ago*

    A diagnosis is impossible to make from this screenshot of a screenshot of a poor image and trying to read that on a phone.

    So I think the question may be more technical than diagnostic.

    The question that’s asked is “can you tell if there’s a problem with this abdominal scan?”

    Which your could read as: “_can you tell if there’s a [problem with this abdominal scan]?” rather than “can you tell if there’s a problem, with this abdominal scan?”

    Now the body shape is unusual, so it may be AGI, but if it’s real the answer would be underexposure and poor collimation at both the top and bottom of the image on a young woman, unnecessarily exposing breast and other tissue to radiation on an X-ray that’s supposed to look for issues in the abdomenm and getting a non-diagnostic X-ray at that.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 14 points 1 week ago

    Is there actually something wrong here? Did she fog up her body or something?

  • source
  • [–] 14 points 1 week ago (2 children)

    AGI stands for A Gigantic Iss?

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 1 week ago

    First correct Grok diagnosis. He's learning!

  • source
  • [–] 9 points 1 week ago*

    They aren't creating intelligence, they're creating a digital people and their person might be a douche bag.

  • source
  • [–] 8 points 1 week ago

    FOS

    Full of shit

  • source
  • [–] 6 points 1 week ago

    I am not a doctor. I don’t know how to diagnose medical problems from an x ray. Groks response is priceless, though.

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 1 week ago
    [–] 1 point 1 week ago

    Right in the AInus.

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 1 week ago

    I wonder if the translation from portuguese is much different from using grok in english

  • source
  • [+] -7 points 1 week ago

    Somebody getting naughty in the xray machine LMBO

  • source