Brian Leeland, a 79-year-old Democratic voter in Detroit, had enough. Frustrated by the way the US media covers this febrile political era, from Donald Trump’s Washington to political campaigns across the country, he contacted the Guardian.

“Your decision to frame the race here as a simple progressive versus establishment choice is overly simplistic verging on lazy,” he wrote to this reporter, after our coverage of progressive Abdul El-Sayed’s campaign in the Democratic US Senate primary in Michigan. “As an electorate, we are not binary for the convenience of the media.”

His was a complaint I heard often as I traveled across the midwest to cover a host of contested Democratic primaries. So I called him up.

Leeland’s list of frustrations is long: grifters, liars, the two-party system, money influencing elections, the US’s standing in the world, the growing national debt and a fixation on cultural issues, not just the larger problems that plague the country.

...

top 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 4 points 6 days ago

Imagine any leader fawning over a triumphant arch with gilding while a war goes on and the economy is sinking. Isn't that enough? C'mon you congress conservatives, become part of your country's society again!

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 6 days ago

    Conservatives are the sworn foot-soldiers of the elite and wealthy. If not for conservatives, the normal people would be able to enforce the law on the wealthy. As long as conservatives continue to live, they will protect the wealthy elite with their lives. That is a guarantee.

  • source
  • [–] 77 points 1 week ago (13 children)

    Yes, most Americans are very upset with the establishment. They just can't agree on who the establishment is.

    Obviously Trump is currently the establishment since he's the one in power right now, but the irony is a lot of the people who voted for him did so because they were angry with the establishment that preceded him. So, many Americans are angry at an establishment that was meant to take on a past establishment that many other Americans had been angry with.

  • source
  • hideshow 13 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 1 week ago* (8 children)

    Obviously Trump is currently the establishment since he’s the one in power right now, ...

    Trump and maga are not the establishment. They are extreme radicals with a completely different agenda than the establishment. Their agenda is to do away with the Constitution and replace it with an authoritarian regime centered on christian nationalism and fascism--of that's not radical, what is? The fact that they managed to take over the government doesn't make them "the establishment" unless you accept that they will maintain power and thus become a new "establishment".

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 24 points 1 week ago (1 child)

    He is practically embedded into the capitalist oligarchy which are ruling the US. You don't get more establishment than that.

    Yes, he is not part of the professional politician gang which has been used to rule, but he is definitely part of the establishment which that gang also was subservient to.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 11 points 1 week ago

    I understand what you're saying, but I don't entirely agree. Trump did win the presidential nomination of one of only two established major political parties. Many Republican politicians who had been part of the US political establishment for decades are now among Trump's coalition. Trump also has the support of some established media organizations, like Fox News. I would also argue that the business establishment is largely the same as it was before Trump came into office.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • [–] 4 points 1 week ago

    Trump has always been a part of the establishment.

    MAGA was made up of three establishments. Evangelical Christians, Generational Wealth, and Corporate Oligarchy. These are the only three groups that are INHERENTLY fascist. There could have never been a single thing that a SANE person would see or hear from this group that would make anyone think that the working class would get anything but more work and more taxes.

    The main problem is actually that about half the country are either illiterate morons, and/or sadistic psychopaths. They all WANTED this

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 3 points 1 week ago*

    my fear is that this trend will splinter only the 'left half' of the vote as a significant number vote third-party from 'lack of options' or as 'punishment'; and that the 'right' will remain mostly united (as they usually do) in their hate and stupidity and greed, allowing republicants to actually gain as a result.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 29 points 1 week ago* (15 children)

    When will they will figure out bOtH pArTiEs are "The Establishment"? Don't hold your breath!

    I vote, and you should, too. They are not the same. One party is "pro-LGBT" and the other is "pro-church" and they are bOtH pro-corporate, pro-billionaire, pro-war, anti-union and so on.

    The differences are the bait. The commonalities are the establishment.

  • source
  • hideshow 15 child comments
  • [–] 32 points 1 week ago (1 child)

    Not everyone, that's why establishment Democrats are fighting progressives in their own party harder than they are fighting Republicans. We need to vote in the progressives to actually represent us.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 5 points 1 week ago*

    We need to stop even labeling them “progressive” or leftists, as is that is some kind of aberration from the norm. It needs to be the default. The establishment and the fascists are the weirdos who perpetuate evil in the name of money and private property.

    “Leftists” just sane, moral folks who want their elected officials to serve the people, for capital to be subordinated to the will of the workers. For the workers to be the ruling class.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 14 points 1 week ago (11 children)

    "bOtH sIdEs" is only true for establishment Dems, and if you pay attention, progressives are gaining in power and prominence. DSA is not the only source, but it's becoming a lightning rod.

    Show me ANY good Republicans. I'll wait.

    The only hope for us is to support the actual progressives instead of lumping them in with the establishmen Democrats, because doing the latter is EXACTLY what the fascists want.

    So it's like you're mostly right but critically wrong when you write off both parties. And yes, voting is critical, but what is even MOR critical is supporting progressive candidates before the primaries and into the primaries and THEN in the general. Always vote, and when you vote, always take the better - or less shitty - option. That's where "vote blue no longer who" comes into play - in the general election, an establishment Dem is still less shitty than a fascist Republican.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 11 child comments
  • load more comments (11 replies)
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 27 points 1 week ago (11 children)

    I have no idea how things can or will improve. As an outsider, America is a strange place. Unfortunately, the world seems hell bent on copying everything it does.

  • source
  • hideshow 11 child comments
  • [–] 14 points 1 week ago (2 children)

    Nah they're definitely less insistent on copying us after this year. A huge chunk of the world has looked at Trump and went "that's not an ally. We need to diversify our allegiances in case the US goes nuts again"

    It's part of the reason China is becoming so popular on the international stage. They want to trade, and they're stable. Trump's foot stamping and attempted "dick waving" power trips have absolutely buried our reputation and bargaining power in the global community.

    Turns out, electing a corrupt man-child who ruins everyone's economy and messes with the global oil supply tends to make a lot of people not like you.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • [–] 7 points 1 week ago

    It becomes less strange when you constantly ask "who benefits financially" because that is the prime mover here. Beyond that, there is little to consider given current evidence increasingly points to lack of meaningful representation regardless of vote.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (6 replies)
    [–] 21 points 1 week ago

    I like this Leeland person.

  • source
  • [–] 19 points 1 week ago (8 children)

    There will be executions after the midterms. The only question is whether they will be orderly and for the people, or chaotic and by the people.

  • source
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 22 points 1 week ago (6 children)

    We are so far removed from that prospect that it almost depresses me, because that's what we need to do to the oligarchs.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 14 points 1 week ago (5 children)

    Such things only occur when it's an act of desperation. Reasonable people don't rebel. People who've been pushed beyond the point of reason rebel.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 17 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

    Yeah, realising your entire lineage’s lifelong earnings for generations amounts to sofa change to megalomaniacs who are also making sure your grandchildren will suffer even more than you are now is bound to make one testy.

    e: all the while children are dying by genocide. The wrong people are being listened to.

  • source
  • [–] 14 points 1 week ago (5 children)

    I'd love to find a news article about an election that says "All is well, people head to polls to show their support for two excellent candidates. Either would be a fantastic choice for the nation."

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 10 points 1 week ago (2 children)

    Billionaires and big tech rig the game with government money and tax loopholes. Sites use AI filters to actively block posts calling out the elite. Scrap income tax; tax wealth and land instead.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
    [–] 7 points 1 week ago

    79 years old.

    Leeland’s list of frustrations is long: grifters, liars, the two-party system, money influencing elections, the US’s standing in the world, the growing national debt and a fixation on cultural issues, not just the larger problems that plague the country.

    Come gather 'round people Wherever you roam And admit that the waters Around you have grown And accept it that soon You'll be drenched to the bone If your time to you is worth savin' Then you better start swimmin' Or you'll sink like a stone For the times they are a-changin'

    Come writers and critics Who prophesize with your pen And keep your eyes wide The chance won't come again And don't speak too soon For the wheel's still in spin And there's no tellin' who that it's namin' For the loser now Will be later to win For the times they are a-changin'

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 1 week ago (2 children)

    Hopefully it's channeled productively for ounce.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 week ago

    I only read the headline, but I think that's fueled all of the elections.

  • source
  • load more comments
    view more: next ›