top 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 33 points 6 days ago

"You were right to push back - that runway was in fact occupied"

  • source
  • [–] 30 points 6 days ago* (4 children)

    Absolute worst possible use of an LLM: something safety-critical.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 19 points 6 days ago (3 children)

    I'm sorry, you're right. I should not have directed that plane to the runway with the two planes that have already crashed into each other.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 6 days ago (2 children)

    It's fine the first two have obviously canceled each other out leaving the runway clear.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 18 points 6 days ago (8 children)

    I don't see ANY comments in here where it's clear that people read the fucking article.

    "Har har, AI and ATC, I'll make a funny joke about flying will be unsafe". Yes, it's expected, but if you actually read what this is - it's going to issue predictions about how busy particular times are, basically.

    ZERO use of the AI in the tower by ATC to control aircraft in any way.

    Sure, they might try to introduce such a thing - at which time your jokes will actually apply!

  • source
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 6 days ago* (3 children)

    I don’t see ANY comments in here where it’s clear that people read the fucking article.

    Average Lemmy user: Get baited into a headline about AI and immediately bitch about how it's the worst thing in the world. No nuance, no legitimate discussion about the issues, just rage.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 6 days ago (2 children)

    It definitely seems like the 100% anti-AI NO MATTER WHAT people hold the majority. heh. Which is only annoying every so often, as I mostly agree with them. Just not totally agree. heh

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 22 points 6 days ago

    I guess the next time I want to travel internationally I'll take a train to Canada and fly out from there.

  • source
  • [–] 11 points 6 days ago

    because we havent had enough air disasters in the past 2 years.

  • source
  • [–] 12 points 6 days ago

    8,750 salaries worth of money betting AI can do this with no actual evidence it can.

  • source
  • [–] 6 points 5 days ago (1 child)

    Ah yes, the same technology that was used to kill 123 Iranian school children

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)

    900 million could just hire a lot of skilled engineers and air traffic operators that can be well paid but that doesn’t sound as cool and futuristic as AI

  • source
  • [–] 8 points 6 days ago

    Well, here's hoping they are in charge of Air Force One.

  • source
  • [–] 7 points 6 days ago

    We’re fucked.

  • source
  • What an absolute slap in the face for the underpaid and overworked ATCs. Been bitching about more money for years?

    Naaah how about your boss is now a clanker

  • source
  • [–] 5 points 6 days ago*

    In theory, an automated system should be able to outperform humans at a rote task like this under the right conditions. However, I don’t imagine throwing LLMs in the mix without redesigning the whole system for automation is going to end well.

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 6 days ago

    That's the end of me flying. The wife and I will now take extra days, get a rental and have us a road trip

  • source
  • load more comments
    view more: next ›