Fire in the hole!

top 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 6 points 1 hour ago

About as cognitive as "nazis just love their country and people"

  • source
  • [–] 5 points 1 hour ago

    It's like fiction and reality are two different things.

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 55 minutes ago

    No holodecks, or more accurately, the ship's computer, are fantasy AI. Chatbots will never be so cool.

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 1 hour ago

    Will Japanese holodeck programs have pixelation?

  • source
  • [–] 15 points 15 hours ago (4 children)

    I fucking hate holodecks.

    They are dangerous, psychologically destructive machines that have no place on earth. We have no idea what prolonged exposure to simulated environments does to the human brain. People are spending hours inside fake worlds instead of interacting with reality. Children are probably going to grow up thinking consequences aren't real because their parents let them spend twelve hours a day fighting robots in a simulated medieval castle.

    And don't even get me started on the fact that the computer can generate literally anything you ask for.

    That is not progress. That is an existential threat to society.

    So, naturally, I have volunteered to personally test every single holodeck in the world.

    Every last one.

    I will spend as much time as necessary inside these horrible, dangerous machines so that nobody else has to endure the terrible psychological consequences of using them.

    You are welcome.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 17 hours ago

    Listen here you little shit..

  • source
  • [–] 24 points 22 hours ago (6 children)

    Star Trek is also a post scarcity society and they aren't using water to run the models. IP ownership in the Federation is still a thing though, so long as the genAI isn't using copyrighted material, it's fine.

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 17 hours ago (4 children)

    I mean you can also run a generative modal locally using green energy, but try going into fuckai and telling them that.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 3 hours ago (1 child)

    It's a good thing that what kind of energy it runs on is the only problem with the technology and that we can cheaply generate the necessary amount of power at home.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • I mean, you certainly don't need any more energy than you would for video games, for most of the stuff people are looking to use at home.

    It is possible to generate it, but even if someone can't, I don't see the fuckai people yelling at game Devs for increasing requirements for so little gain, or at GPU Devs for not focusing enough on the draw power of GPUs. In fact, just 1 or 2 years ago I think, NVIDIA released a GPU generation that was only a little more powerful but had a lot more energy efficiency, and they got shat on by the internet because it wasn't powerful enough - no cared about the lower power draw.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 22 points 23 hours ago (1 child)

    Meh I thought the holodeck was mostly a writer's crutch and an excuse to loot the Paramount lot for period costumes.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • Star Trek's universe: Federation citizens live in essentially zero scarcity where labor is optional and people can dedicate their lives to basically anything they like that this within their capabilities.

    Star Trek's AI: A typically flawless tool (when the plot doesn't require an incident), optionally used by the individual, to perform complex calculations, simulations or provide immersion entertainment, complimenting whatever task needs done.

    Our universe: We live in a capitalist society where the survival of 95% of the population requires them to sell their labor, where the majority of the population works in any job(s) they can get to make ends meet, where working in a creative or intellectually fulfilling field is a rare blessing and prohibitive to most, where your capitalist overlords claim the majority of your productivity for themselves and see the wages they do pay you as a burden to them that should be minimized regardless of your well-being.

    Our AI: Devalues or replaces creative and intellectual roles. Forced down the throats of workers and consumers. Used to collectively monitor everyone. Used to push more wealth to a concentrated few. Notably and constantly unreliable while given unearned trust. Not actually intelligent, just good at specific kinds of prediction and parroting based on training from real works from real people that was stolen without the consent of the creators to be fed into the machines to be plagiarized on request. A genuine risk to the stability of our economy. A nightmare for the mental health of children and those vulnerable to delusions and/or thoughts of self-harm. Increasingly used to replace thought and skill development making us collectively dumber and more reliant on it.

  • source
  • [–] 16 points 1 day ago (4 children)

    The simplest answer, real world LLMs and AI are real, and holodecks are fictional. Plenty of things are cool in fiction and not something we should actually build.

    See the classic tweet about the Torment Nexus.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 23 hours ago (2 children)

    LLMs and AI are real

    I would say that the "AI" we currently have aren't really AI as most people imagine or how they are thought depicted in science fiction.

    Intellect usually requires a capacity to think, understand, and at least mimic the way the mind learns. The current machine learning we currently call AI is more a kin to the classic Chinese Room thought experiment.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
  • [–] 9 points 21 hours ago

    Even in the future it breaks containment and endangers human life.

  • source
  • [–] 55 points 1 day ago* (9 children)

    It's a little more than just the genAI part tho.

    You can fuck the holograms. If real world genAI was fuckable, FuckAI would not be an anti-AI community; it would be a NSFW one.

  • source
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • load more comments (9 replies)
    [–] 164 points 1 day ago (21 children)

    If we got all the other socialist progressive benefits of the Star Trek universe, including no billionaires, then I think we'd be a lot less unhappy with generative AI as presented in that world.

    How they built it, and what they plan to do with it is a pretty big part of the reason for our anger.

  • source
  • hideshow 21 child comments
  • [–] [S] 104 points 1 day ago (15 children)

    Yeah, if we de-meme it and really want to define it, the difference is Star Trek is a post-scarcity world, so generative AI building things doesn't take anything away from human artists - it doesn't affect their livelihoods because their livelihoods are guaranteed.

    As always...

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 15 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 4 hours ago

    We very nearly live in a post scarcity world too. Just all our resources and labor are funneled into the hands of a few wealthy billionaires.

    Star Trek is very Utopian. If it operated anything like our dystopian world it would have a lot of scarcity. For instance there is only one earth in Star Trek.

    In our timeline it is most billionaires goal to own the whole planet. Then after that 2 planets then hundreds of planets then 1000s of galaxies.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 9 points 1 day ago (13 children)

    Plus I think it helps that much of what the holodeck recreates is centuries old at that point. 21st century earth, long ago. It’s not anyone’s current creations, and then beyond that it’s using data that the federation personally got by exploration. Like if people only used AI to generate medieval drawings I don’t think anyone would be too upset really. Maybe weirded out but not upset. Aside from the environmental concerns I guess.

    however generating holo characters that look like your coworkers and doing weird stuff to them is a entirely canon issue. And Star Trek never touched on it, but wow would it be easy to fake footage of historical events in a holodeck, especially to civilizations without advanced technology. I work in history as my career and the amount of YouTube videos telling fake stories and showing fake footage of 20th century history is genuinely terrifying. I don’t know what the solution is. Digitization was meant to preserve historical footage but now it just makes it look just like the fake stuff. If anyone digitized historical footage and the physical no longer exists, verifying anything will become a nightmare and sometimes it would be strictly possible.

    Honestly the more I think about the holodeck the more I think it’s dangerous as fuck, literally and socially, and Star Trek shows usually only very innocence uses for it. Like you thought parasocial relationships are bad now?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 13 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 1 day ago (5 children)

    Some trekker should correct me here, or clarify, but I'm pretty sure that in TNG the character Barclay used the holodeck to treat his crippling social anxiety, which involved holos of his crewmates and got into some very awkward situations.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] [S] 4 points 20 hours ago (1 child)

    One extremely interesting aspect of that episode is that while Barclay DID create holographic depictions of the crew for his fantasy world, and it does weird out the staff, they don't actually present the holodeck recreations of the crew members as a PROBLEM in and of itself. The prevailing view isn't "This is unacceptable" - it's that "This is a disruptive fantasy that is preventing Barclay from developing socially and fitting in as a member of the crew." Whether you chalk that up to bad writing or the future being accepting of using the holodeck to realize one's personal desires is up to the viewer's interpretation, I guess. Even after all these years, I don't think we have enough information about the Star Trek universe to know.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 7 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (6 children)

    Actually Star Trek: Lower Decks covers the issue of using AI for nefarious purposes. In the series finale, an enemy Klingon superimposes video of a Starfleet admiral over herself making a message ordering the handover of a Klingon asylum seeker (second-in-command smells something fishy and hides the asylum seeker, until the video is confirmed a fake). Then in the comic Shaxs' Worst Day, the head security officer, Shaxs, uses the holodeck to recreate the bridge of a ship he just commandeered to pretend to be the captain he just killed while communicating with evil universe Starfleet command.

    It should be noted that Lower Decks was made in the last decade, and not only incorporates a lot of contemporary social/technological issues and concerns, but also is a comedic reflection on the Star Trek franchise, and freely calls out things that have made fans go "huh?"

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • load more comments (4 replies)
  • load more comments (5 replies)
    [–] 63 points 1 day ago (3 children)

    Artificial intelligence in science fiction is intelligence that's artificial.

    Artificial intelligence in real life is more akin to what we'd call "artificial flavors" in some fruit drink that contains 0% fruit. Isn't fruit, doesn't taste like fruit, but it's purple and sweet, so fuck it: "grape". We've accomplished the "artificial" part, but not the bit that actually matters.

    So, yeah, AI in sci-fi is unironically great. "AI" irl is shit. If the real version ever comes close to the sci-fi version, you'll see a lot of the haters change our tune, but until then we'll call a turd a turd.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • load more comments (3 replies)
    [–] 35 points 1 day ago

    "Make an opponent capable of defeating Data"

    ST AI: Have a supercharged Moriarty.

    RL AI: deletes production database

  • source
  • [–] 5 points 1 day ago*

    The difference is that Starfleet has the ethical standards in place to make that technology non disruptive to their society. We wouldn't survive being gifted ships that can glass the planet, for example. Wed fuck that up immediately.

  • source
  • load more comments
    view more: next ›