top 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 89 points 2 days ago (8 children)

Formal prompt engineering certification?

Lol. Lmao even

  • source
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 13 points 2 days ago (7 children)
  • [–] 31 points 2 days ago (5 children)

    From paper mills? Probably. Accredited? Unlikely.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 2 days ago (3 children)

    Yeah none that I would respect, but I bet you could buy a qualification

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 2 days ago (1 child)

    Cisco has a prompt engineering course that counts for CE credits. I know because it was one of two free courses available that I used to recert recently. Welcome to hell.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • [–] 28 points 2 days ago (7 children)

    Calling them 'prompt engineers' has to be a real kick in the nuts to actual engineers.

  • source
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 15 points 2 days ago (6 children)

    Software engineer is still insulting to a lot of mechanical engineers

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 14 points 2 days ago (3 children)

    All engineers know that their specific field of work is the most important, most difficult and most complex type of engineering there is.

    Most of them are wrong of course, because the aforementioned field is PLC design and programming. Which is coincidentally, what I do.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 2 days ago

    Anyone that's completed an actual engineering degree/diploma knows that there is a significant difference between completing an engineering course and being an engineer. Unfortunately, there's lots of people that haven't done either and still use the name.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 7 points 2 days ago

    really? I don't know anyone that feels that way. mechanical, mechatronics, and software are my closest friend groups.

    maybe it's just that the additional professional qualification of engineer in my province adds a clear distinction between engineering graduate and professional engineer

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 2 days ago

    Idk I guess I didn't finish my degree but it felt very engineering focused, I'm not going to guess your knowledge but software engineers build systems that can basically do anything.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 44 points 2 days ago (2 children)

    You can work much faster with AIs than is shown on wall clock time.

    Just make sure that you’re working with 9 LLMs at once and you can get that 9 years experience in just one year.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 32 points 2 days ago (3 children)

    Guess who wrote that job description

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 24 points 2 days ago (2 children)

    The word "relevant" suggests that the only people who can possibly meet those qualifications are the authors of https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Attention_Is_All_You_Need, which was published just about 9 years ago

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 2 days ago

    I've got like 30 years experience with AI if you include street fighter 2 turbo edition single player mode

  • source
  • [–] 7 points 2 days ago

    It says overall experience. Just say you worked two simultaneous AI jobs for the last five years and you're good!

  • source
  • [–] 10 points 2 days ago

    Yeah, that kinda crap has been around for forever, I know I ran into these same types of HR written BS requirements back in the 2000 when I was searching for jobs and .NET and Java was the latest hotness, been out for just a few years and was running into job postings requesting 5 - 10 years of experience.

  • source
  • [–] 15 points 2 days ago* (6 children)

    8 or 9 years is about right for when modern LLMs started. Do people really think LLMs just sprang into existence a few years ago with giant corporations pushing them?

    The tech is decades old depending on how you look at it, and even under a rather strict definition it's pushing at least a decade.

    To be fair to qualify for all of that unless your a researcher on transformer models or something I really doubt your going to find anyone that fits all those points for that length of time.

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (2 children)

    That one "AI dungeon" videogame from like 2019 was using gpt2 and it was still better than current "exponentially improving" chatgpt at most things. Was just a bit more porn oriented that's all.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)

    As a mobile dev, I remember seeing jobs early on that would have years of experience required that predated android/ios.

  • source
  • [–] 7 points 2 days ago

    Good thing I've used ELIZA my whole life.

  • source
  • [–] 7 points 2 days ago (7 children)

    Machine learning/LLM actually was around 10 years ago, it just didn't have the farcical "AI" moniker.

  • source
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 2 days ago (3 children)

    Yeah.

    The groundbreaking "Attention Is All You Need" paper, in which transformer architecture was proposed, was published 9 years ago. It was obviously part of a much longer running conversation around how to use linear algebra to find machine learning applications. If you're looking for someone who understands the underlying math and processes at a lower level, this isn't an unreasonable ask.

    It is, however, an unreasonable ask of someone for a "prompt engineer" job though.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 2 days ago

    I was a PM and wrote specs, that's prompt engineering.

  • source
  • That's more experience than Big Balls had to go through everyone's shit.

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 2 days ago (1 child)

    We could go pretty far back depending on how you define it. We had less useful items that still could qualify in the same category as a modern LLM 7-8 years ago which gets us close... You could potentially stretch the definition to something like Megahal which is pushing pretty close to 30 years old.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 2 days ago (2 children)

    There were technically ais back then. They just didn't do much and just spout nonsense sentences

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments
    view more: next ›