Trans journalist Erin Reed has published a list of Democratic midterm candidates with anti-trans records, and the question she is forcing is one the party would rather not answer: if trans voters keep rewarding Democrats who harm them, what signal does that send? The calculation is real, the stakes are high, and there is no clean answer.

top 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 15 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Short Answer: Baby/Bath water idiom

Long Answer: Dems lose elections because sub groups hate someone they have 98% in common with than someone who likes to bomb children.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
    [–] 11 points 3 days ago*

    I disagree strongly with the Democratic party. I despise a good deal of their platform, and am disgusted with about 90% of those that are elected. To me, they are an insult and an embarrassment.

    ... and I still voted for them in the last national election. Nobody likes them.

  • source
  • [–] 9 points 3 days ago

    You vote for them because they are more likely to change their tune than a republican.

    Plus you do everything to make their life miserable until he changes his mind.

  • source
  • [–] 13 points 3 days ago (10 children)

    Choosing between the party where every elected official wants to unalive you, vs the party where only a handful want to do the same…

    Yeah, that is a tough one. Really difficult decision, there.

  • source
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 3 days ago (3 children)

    In the places where the blue candidate is a transphobe, it's transphobe vs transphobe

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 3 days ago* (2 children)

    Yes, but if Dems remain in the minority, it’ll still be a Republican majority, giving them more time to dismantle democracy even further.

    It’s the bigger picture which is most important. You cannot create lasting local change without removing the autocratic boot from above.

    I mean, yes, let’s make these transphobe Dems as uncomfortable as possible. But America needs to roll back the fascism and authoritarianism, first. Without that first step, every other positive action is a house built on sand - it can be blown away from the top with infinite ease. And then it’s 1939 Germany all over again with pink triangles and pogroms aplenty.

    And honestly, I see that outcome as the much, much worse one.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 3 days ago

    Yes, but if Dems remain in the minority, it’ll still be a Republican majority, giving them more time to dismantle democracy even further.

    And if the transphobic Dems vote with the Republicans, trans people lose anyway. Democrats don't do party discipline, so the anti-trans laws get passed anyway under the guise of "concessions", so heads you're dead, tails you're still dead but someone somewhere feels bad about it.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • load more comments (6 replies)
    [–] 35 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (9 children)

    MLK supported getting less bad segregationists elected during the early stages of the civil rights movement because they were easier to work with, do we still have segregation today? If trans people in sports is the only contention and they agree on everything else, then that's progress. We can fight on the trans people in sports point next primary. Let's also not forget that Donald Trump is trying to end Democracy entirely and will oppress more than just trans people.

  • source
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • load more comments (8 replies)
    [–] 72 points 4 days ago (9 children)

    Ranked choice voting so we stop having to pick terrible Democrats. Gaining prevalence in local elections!

  • source
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 20 points 3 days ago (1 child)

    I’ve started getting involved with my local Democratic Party. I no longer consider myself a Democrat, but they don’t need to know that, and I figure if I’m able to get more up close and personal, influence people in real time that would be a much better option than just not voting for these anti trans democrats or doing nothing.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 2 days ago (2 children)

    Do people not realize Republicans won in their messaging? Everything related to trans support is MUCH lower than it was before. The best democrats can do is dogwhistle support, because it's very unpopular right now, which it's horrible that's the case but thats not the fault of the politicians who are trying to improve things.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] [S] 3 points 2 days ago* (1 child)

    They won in their messaging because no one defended it and instead caved to support it.

    Dems have lost in all messaging. They won’t push the quality of living and problems of capitalism, instead they agree to attack trans people.

    There are a few exceptions, and they do well in their respective places when they actually push back. But most are cowards.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 1 day ago

    They didn't cave until they lost the messaging, and yes the messaging has been unbelievably bad. There's a series called the alt right playbook where one of the strategies is control the conversation, democrats are always playing defense saying no we don't want everyone to be transgender no we aren't giving 8 year olds hormones for no reason. That's just a losing strategy.

    I'm not saying they couldn't be doing more, but it's like trying to stand up for black rights in an election in a community of racists, you're going to get swept by the guy who is openly racist. The media has massively failed us on the trans issue and now most Americans are anti trans, it sucks and I have trans friends who are super hurt by it, but I'm not going to let the fascist supporters win, when they are actively trying to kill Americans, and trans people, and the rest of the world.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 39 points 4 days ago* (15 children)

    I just don't get the obsession with transgender people. What did they ever do other than just wanting to be left alone? Did a bunch of them bomb a bunch orphanages with burning puppies running out of the flaming building?

  • source
  • hideshow 15 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 3 days ago

    It's a greatly exaggerated/manufactured culture war topic for the purpose of distracting from the very real class war.

    It's not a coincidence that anti-trans rhetoric started around the same time the war on terror started losing its effectiveness as an excuse and the 1% narrative was starting to take root.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 6 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

    Authoritarian personalities agress toward outgroups who violate traditional norms, including socially traditional gender roles. They become a scapegoat during times of capitalistic economic uncertainty.

    We’re in part of the cycle where liberal democracy decays and fascism flourishes. A core tenet of fascist ideology is the championing of the in-group with religious fervor and nationalistic pride. This is seen as a populist way to “save the country,” when the real problem is capitalism and the exploitation of workers. This is why fascists demonize socialists, communists and even liberals.

    Both the GOP (conservatives) and the far left (tankies) can reflect this personality type.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (13 replies)
    [–] 9 points 3 days ago (3 children)

    Vote for them and then get them to have pro-trans rights views. Like we did with Obama and gay marriage.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 3 days ago (2 children)

    That's one way to do it. Sounds like throwing in the towel at first, but if their strategy was to shift the Overton Window, it might not be a bad plan to shift it right back.

    I'm so tired of these people touching kids and then fucking with trans folks.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 26 points 4 days ago

    One of the best responses I've heard was from the Professional Left:

    https://www.buzzsprout.com/229/episode_players/19814024-ep-1022-the-hearts-of-men?client_source=large_player&referrer=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.buzzsprout.com%2F229.js%3Fplayer%3Dlarge

    (Starting around the 26:30 mark)

    Boils down to: Democrats can be educated, Republicans will destroy you. Quite possibly in the literal sense.

  • source
  • [–] 16 points 3 days ago

    believe it or not, also guillotine.

  • source
  • [–] 29 points 4 days ago (15 children)

    Vote for the pro-trans Republican instead, obviously! /S

    The time to oppose anti-trans Democrats is the primary. In the general election, it's too late: at that point your choice is an anti-trans Democrat or an anti-trans and otherwise fascist Republican.

  • source
  • hideshow 15 child comments
  • [–] [S] 23 points 4 days ago (5 children)

    Many of these Democrats such as Talarico waited until after the primary to start their anti-trans rhetoric. We would have already voted them out if they didn’t deceive us.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 22 points 4 days ago* (2 children)

    The only question that's valid to have about Talerico on this topic is "is Ken Paxton better, or is he even worse?" The answer is, "no, Ken Paxton is even worse." If Talerico doesn't win, Paxton WILL. End of.

    For trans Texans, not voting for Talerico in order to keep Paxton out of office is objectively idiotic -- it's basically suicide by spite. That's just reality, and reality doesn't give a fuck if you like it or not.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
  • load more comments (2 replies)
  • load more comments (9 replies)
    [–] 29 points 4 days ago (2 children)

    Voting shouldn’t be a sacrifice of that magnitude.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 32 points 4 days ago

    For a lot of single-issue voters, this kind of calculation is theoretical. For trans people right now, it is not. An anti-trans Democrat in office is a harm. A Republican who is openly, aggressively, legislatively hostile to trans existence is a different order of harm. Both things are true, and genuinely hard to reconcile.

    Yeah, that's an awful choice. I can't think of a better option than the article presents — name the candidates and their shortcomings/wrongs.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 22 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (17 children)

    I like how its always a minorities job to vote against their own self interest "for the greater good" and not the job of a Democratic politician to not throw them under the bus. Especially with how seemingly extremely important this one demographic is if a significant portion of said demographic not voting will cause the candidate to lose.

  • source
  • hideshow 17 child comments
  • load more comments (17 replies)
    load more comments
    view more: next ›