top 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 64 points 4 days ago (1 child)

In this thread: People who work for banks or tangential industries telling people 'That is just how it works' and ignoring the fact that it only works that way because the banks have chosen the path of maximum returns and least convenience for their customers.

"it is policy" is the modern version of "Natural Law" It is a thought-ending cliche.

All of you defending this need to step back for a second and ask yourself how much of your life is controlled by policy and 'it is what it is' at your own expense and to the profit of the leech class.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 14 points 3 days ago

    Also "this is how it works (in the US)" and, as always, forgetting the rest of the world exists and works differently. EU has done several things lately to speed up things like this, and it's been better than what's written here for many years/decades.
    Reading almost anything about the US as a European never stops being like hearing about how we used to have it 30 years ago.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 130 points 4 days ago (22 children)

    Not to defend corporations and banks, but it’s kinda true. When you swipe your debit card, your bank allocates those funds for that transaction, but whoever you’re paying doesn’t actually have it yet, and your bank hasn’t sent it yet. That’s just the way the banking system works. It can take days for them to actually get your money, depending on weekends, holidays, etc. When you request a refund, the process just goes in reverse.

    Think of it like a check. If I write a check and give it to someone, I write the amount in the check register as if it’s spent, but until that person takes my check to the bank, they don’t actually have the money yet.

  • source
  • hideshow 22 child comments
  • [–] 37 points 4 days ago* (5 children)

    I’ve worked for multiple different financial institutions. I’ve been on the banker side and the consumer side of the industry and I can assure you banks absolutely do have the ability to send your money back instantly.

    While there are certain federal and international laws that could impact transfer times, this is rare and not something your average Joe would run into.

    Most banks want to hold onto your money for as long as possible because that’s how they earn their money. And banks aren’t the only ones who do this. Companies will hold out on issuing refunds for the same reason.

    It’s sort of the perfect way to show the penny savings example I guess. Because yeah, the interested earned is pennies, but when you have a million pennies earning another million pennies… it adds up.

    [EDITED: to changed an autocorrect from warned to earned]

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 4 days ago

    I deposited a large check once — nothing that would get the attention of the IRS or anything, other than that I’m normally poor — to a regular national bank. They held it for about two weeks to “verify” it, aka invest and profit off it, so I immediately went over to the local credit union (who doesn’t do shit like that) and opened an account there. Got a good chunk of it transferred with little-to-no fuss and closed out my bank account with a middle finger.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 6 points 4 days ago (1 child)

    I can assure you banks absolutely do have the ability to send your money back instantly.

    USAA does this for certain refunds, but they take on a bit of risk to do so. They make the funds available to spend before they've actually been settled

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 4 points 3 days ago (1 child)

    In Europe there's a system called SEPA, which is a network that allows instant transfer of funds. Right now, by law, banks are required to allow consumers to use SEPA at the same conditions as the regular old bank transfer, which means I could send you money right now for free and you could receive it instantly anywhere in the EU.

    The technology exists. Banks just have no incentive on implementing it

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

    Warning, Pedantry Ahead: Regular SEPA is maximum 1 business day - that's what's currently mandated by law in the whole SEPA area.

    SEPA Instant is what you're describing - that's only mandatory for banks /in the Euro area/, not all of Europe. (That said, our local banks here in Romania at least have offered instant payments in local currency for donkeys' as well.) Apparently SEPA Instant will be mandatory for whole SEPA area from next year.

    (Full disclosure - edited above because I didn't realise SEPA-Instant was now mandatory in the Euro area since last year.)

    As you say though, the technology absolutely exists. And not just within the SEPA area; I also have accounts in Thailand and China - a transfer from my Romanian account to my Thai account is literally instantaneous (it's not unusual to get the "you have received..." popup from my Thai banking app before the "you have sent..." popup,) and to my Chinese account takes 5 minutes, tops - 7 days/week. The idea of having to wait days - let alone business days - for a payment to clear is just wild "let's take a time machine back 30 years" stuff.

    (I mean... Cheques! Seriously. They still use cheques... shakes head.)

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 24 points 4 days ago* (4 children)

    I agree completely; I often do credit card refunds and that can take me a minute on my end, but your own bank might not release your funds back to you for days or weeks.

    I know it can be weeks because I had to check in with the same customer a few times to confirm that their bank was being the problem rather the payment processor we had.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 4 days ago

    I worked in retail for 15 years, and this came up all the time. Yes, your money has been “accessed” in your account, but if I run my journal and show it to you, you would see we don’t actually have it yet.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (3 replies)
  • [–] 12 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 child)

    This avoids OP’s point. When you get charged, the charges appear instantly, sure it might not be fully verified.

    But when you get a refund, it does not appear instantly. There is absolutely no reason why it shouldn’t.

    Also, I’m always very annoyed that banking apps can’t do a simple and proper summary in which verified and unverified transactions just appear normally with a little tag and the total charges just adds those up.

    It’s just simple math and accounting, idk why they have to make the interface painful. Regardless of what the status of the transaction is, it’s verification status should be a label, not make it appear in purgatory only to disappear for a day to finally show up.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • [–] 23 points 4 days ago (6 children)

    They don't instantly take your money. It's instantly made unavailable to you, but it's still held by your bank for a bit before they receive it.

    When they refund money to you, it's instantly unavailable to them, but is still held by their bank a bit before you receive it.

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 13 points 4 days ago (4 children)

    So it’s banks stealing from both sides.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 4 days ago (1 child)

    Yes, but it's also a coordintion thing.

    Banks, businesses, and payment processors have to coordinate billions of payments a day and it's easier to do occasional reconciliation followed by an adjuted transfer for the net difference instead of a ton of individual transfers, most of which cancel each other out.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • [–] 14 points 3 days ago

    BUSINESS days. Motherfucker, EVERY day is a business day.

  • source
  • [–] 5 points 3 days ago

    Yup. Spent the first two years of my professional career being overpaid. They grabbed that money back within a day of the audit (which I had to ask for).

    Was owed money as part of a business trip.

    Didn't see a dime for months.

  • source
  • [–] 19 points 4 days ago

    Our banks could front the money to us with virtually zero risk, because the funds are coming back through the system from other banks. They just want to keep it on the books as long as is legal to earn interest.

    If you want to change this, you need to vote for people who are not in bed with the banks. That means no incumbents, and especially no Republican incumbents. No, not all politicians are corrupt, but nearly all of them are, term limits for Congress would help mitigate this, certainly better than no term limits.

  • source
  • [–] 16 points 4 days ago

    The entirety of modern banking is predatory pieces of shit doing nothing but using us.

  • source
  • [–] 24 points 4 days ago* (7 children)

    I've been waiting since June! Broke my phone, Samsung's website glitched while I was paying the $99 insurance fee to get it replaced, so they took my money and never created the repair order. So I've been fighting with both Samsung and my bank for three months now; they still have my $99, and my phone is still broken.

    I wish I could afford a lawyer.

  • source
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 21 points 4 days ago (7 children)

    They didn't take the money in 2 seconds though. That's why it shows as a "pending" transaction.

  • source
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 18 points 4 days ago (6 children)

    Depends. Some take it in 2 seconds, some don't. Transfers take milliseconds either way in SEPA.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 4 days ago

    And the US built something similar, fully funded it’s creation, and then it all got thrown away at the last second by Trump because the corrupt banks like profiting off of the old system.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (5 replies)
  • [–] 15 points 4 days ago

    Lots of comments in this thread that are splitting the details. Which , fine. The underlying issue that is being broadly gestured to is consumer protection vs. corporate protections - or even more broadly just the double standards of rights for organizations vs. people ; look at the LLM piracy that occurred vs. individuals that get caught pirating. Look at the harm against children fee that meta is paying vs what happens to individuals that harm children. With consolidation of power/money consumer choice goes down and with consolidation of wealth corruption goes up leading to less choice w/less protections.

  • source
  • [–] 10 points 3 days ago

    Next time a place tells me that the refund is going to take a week. I'm going to say okay, give me the item and I'll bring it back in a week as soon as the refund goes through.

  • source
  • [–] 18 points 4 days ago (1 child)

    Fucking amen so Fucking true. I hate hearing that shit. They always say its your bank. Bullshit. Should be laws refunds should come at the same rate you took the funds instantly.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 13 points 4 days ago

    But process attrition helps prevents giving it back.

    Business is psychopathic.

  • source
  • [–] 12 points 4 days ago

    You mean the banks want to hold on to the money longer so they can earn interest on it? Shocked I say!

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 3 days ago

    Fuck banks, find a credit union

  • source
  • [–] 10 points 4 days ago

    Transaction time is there so your money is the banks money for a few days.

  • source
  • [–] 5 points 4 days ago (1 child)

    What really astounds me is that somehow the receiving bank actually knows instantly when a refund is on it's way.

    I have a Revolut bank account and recently I went to a shop to return an item. Less than ten seconds after the cashier issued the refund I got a notification from Revolut: a refund is on it's way.

    Of course the money was not there instantly but the amount was already listed in the transactions (greyed out until the money is actually there)

    I never had this with any other banking app and always had to check regularly if the money has arrived.

    I love Revolut for this and many other features that other banks simply won't put into their apps.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 3 points 3 days ago (1 child)

    Are you aware weeks are only 7 days, not...17?

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)

    Be glad you didn't get charged a 25% "restocking fee"

  • source
  • load more comments
    view more: next ›