Work slop! Just love people using LLMs to hand the heavy lifting over to me.

Just complete the AI slop trough and copy and paste the ticket back into Claude to fix and open an MR and then have Claude review it and merge and then when there is a bug repeat the process.

I honestly don't know what people are thinking, both employees and employers when people start copy pasting LLM shit. Why do I need you if all you are is a glorified macro? I strongly suspect the human is there to be the fall guy when the LLM invariably does something really stupid.

My god, had someone send in a merge request with utter garbage, with Claude describing some nonsensical "root cause" as to why a function didn't work. Claude made two changes:

• If the current scheme failed, use an entirely different scheme it claimed the software supports that does not work and was never documented as a way to work.
• If that scheme fails, swallow the error and don't report the problem, leaving the problem silently in place but out of the user's view at least for a short while. This is actually the change that 'fixed' the problem.

So I needed to know the debug data for what really went wrong, but the submitter got all pissy and said Claude already sorted it out and why can't I just accept their slop merge request as-is, refusing to believe that all it did was catch and silently drop any and all errors associated with the code instead of fixing it. Wouldn't run the procedure I stated would show them they had messed up data as a result of their 'fix'.

The fabled meat proxies.

I have narrowed the containment of the isolation.
Now I’m verifying the resolution path of the indicators.
Permission to accumulate the resolution of the transformation.

I know what all of those words mean individually…

I don’t even get tickets. I get tagged into a slack thread full of slop trying to guess why I am here and what I’m supposed to do.

My workflow is :

Step one: write down a bunch of nonsense, massive block comments of old code in case the new code is worse, and cludges in one massive file.

Step two: rewrite the whole thing: breaking it down into classes so it's readable and maintainable ...

Step 3: come back later and wonder where the hell anything is. Go to step 1

I was only ever observed to have autism, but I highly suspect that I'm audhd. What kind of hell is this where caffeine can help my ADHD focus but harms my autistic focus

For me it doesn't make me feel awake, only incapable of sleeping. Which is hell, like being thirsty and not being able to drink

They exist, but I'd like to pretend they don't.

I put together a new modpack for minecraft this year and from that i can verify that this comment definitely checks out.

ADHD is wildly common in the field. Everyone in my infosec department has it, which is amazing because we all get the struggle.

Some of us have to rawdog it, due to the meth myth.

from what I've heard from my software engineer friends, a decent coder with standard knowledge of CS and the language they're using will always write better (more optimized, more debuggable, etc.) code than currently available LLMs

even if the "fraction" is closer to 1 than 0, the heavy lifting here is done by "look what they need." vibe coders need gigantic climate destroying machines to write code that isn't as good as what an educated programmer writes running on a burrito and coffee

Hands shaking but mind is going brrrr