this post was submitted on 09 Apr 2025
531 points (99.8% liked)

Not The Onion

15870 readers
1571 users here now

Welcome

We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!

The Rules

Posts must be:

  1. Links to news stories from...
  2. ...credible sources, with...
  3. ...their original headlines, that...
  4. ...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”

Please also avoid duplicates.

Comments and post content must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.

And that’s basically it!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] floofloof@lemmy.ca 21 points 6 days ago

"Oh shit, this is bikers against child abuse? Sorry, I'm in the wrong room."

[–] Formfiller@lemmy.world 20 points 6 days ago (2 children)

Bet he’s getting a cabinet position

[–] WrenFeathers@lemmy.world 8 points 6 days ago

He’ll be in charge of the new K-2 education reform.

[–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 2 points 6 days ago

fails upwards

[–] x00z@lemmy.world 7 points 6 days ago (2 children)

Is there a possibility that they were in possession of the material because they were investigating child abuse?

[–] Gingerlegs@lemmy.world 3 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Doesn’t seem like it

John Todaro, 49, of Amherst, was allegedly found to be in possession of child pornography following an Internet Crimes Against Children investigation. He was also disseminating child pornography, officials said.

[–] x00z@lemmy.world 5 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (2 children)

Yes I read that, but it can mean anything. Disseminating can literally just be "this is the girl we need to save:". I'm not claiming they are innocent. But these are bikers with a cause. Governmental CSAM investigators also have and share these images.

[–] PolydoreSmith@lemmy.world 16 points 6 days ago

And now you’ve identified a major problem with vigilante justice, especially as it relates to csa.

[–] Gingerlegs@lemmy.world 2 points 6 days ago

Fair enough, I hadn’t thought of that angle

[–] frostysauce@lemmy.world 2 points 6 days ago

Sure that's the reason...

Released on his own recognizance?

What the fuck

[–] celeste@kbin.earth 135 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Unfortunately, it's the kind of role that'll attract predators, even though I'm sure most of the people involved just want to do good. Like teaching and abusers and nurses and serial killing, etc.

[–] entwine413@lemm.ee 74 points 1 week ago (2 children)
[–] WhatAmLemmy@lemmy.world 55 points 1 week ago (1 children)

+ politicians. Basically any position that grants power over others — especially the weak and vulnerable — which is why there should be an "abuse of power multiplier" applied to these criminals more than any other.

Politicians and other parties who engage in political or regulatory corruption should get life in prison, as they destroy the public trust in democracy and institutions. Same for the justice system.

[–] dylanmorgan@slrpnk.net 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

That multiplier should include sledgehammers in some way.

[–] Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)

HHH has entered the chat

Which coincidently means motorhead music is now playing. It's Lemmy on Lemmy!

[–] the_crotch@sh.itjust.works 1 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Considering the amount of Nazi memoribilia that guy owned idk how long he would last in lemmy

[–] Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world 1 points 6 days ago (1 children)

.....what? I'm out of the loop here. What makes you say HHH had lots of nazi stuff?

[–] the_crotch@sh.itjust.works 2 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (1 children)

I meant Lemmy from Motorhead.

"the SS uniform is fucking brilliant! They were the rock stars of that time. What you're gonna do? They just look good.""

https://www.theguardian.com/music/2008/jul/11/news.culture

[–] Forester@pawb.social 2 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Hugo boss had drip not the clowns wearing the suits

[–] the_crotch@sh.itjust.works 3 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Calling the SS "the rock stars of their time" is at best a really stupid thing to say. And at worst, welp.

[–] Forester@pawb.social 2 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (1 children)

I'm just mad that they ruined a great fit and mustache in the same decade. I'm not supporting the people that did those things or the people that think they looked like rockstars.

[–] the_crotch@sh.itjust.works 1 points 6 days ago

I know. My criticisms are aimed at Lemmy killmister.

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 32 points 1 week ago

No, they said that most of them want to do good. So not like cops.

[–] Nougat@fedia.io 77 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Todaro was released on his own recognizance. He is expected back in court in May.

wat

[–] ImplyingImplications@lemmy.ca 54 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Innocent until proven guilty. Nobody should be in jail without a conviction.

[–] Nougat@fedia.io 49 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Illinois does it right. No bail. Either you are released pending trial, or you see a judge where you may be held pending trial.

New York State has bail. Why this guy was released without even having to post bail is beyond me.

[–] Damage@feddit.it 24 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Bail is an abhorrent, very American, concept

[–] vxx@lemmy.world 9 points 6 days ago

Indeed, it favours rich and punishes poor people

[–] driving_crooner@lemmy.eco.br 1 points 6 days ago

In Brazil it use to be like bail system, but instead of paying you needed a college degree. It was stuck down like 4 years ago because the Supreme Court found it unconstitutional.

[–] phdepressed@sh.itjust.works 18 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Recent bail reform means NY doesn't anymore in most minor cases. You're either freed til trial or not depending on judgment of flight and violence risk. Big republican talking point because a lot of R judges have just been releasing violent repeat offenders to stir the pot. So Dems are trying to reform the reform to be a bit more feasible and Republicans want to return to previous where even petty theft could have you locked up for years waiting for trial if you couldn't make bail.

[–] ShaggySnacks@lemmy.myserv.one 20 points 1 week ago (1 children)

of R judges have just been releasing violent repeat offenders to stir the pot.

This really confirms that the judiciary is just another branch of the political parties.

[–] rickyrigatoni@lemm.ee 6 points 1 week ago

Always has been.

[–] Nougat@fedia.io 10 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Do you know the details of this particular case? Or are you just basing this on a headline you read?

In this climate of disappearing people who disagree with you, and targeting political opponents, I'm not sure I'm comfortable with locking everyone up without due process.

Not saying it's the case, at all, but if you wanted to take someone down, planting cp on their computer is a sure fire way to do it. Particularly because of (understandable) knee jerk reactions like yours.

[–] angrystego@lemmy.world 3 points 6 days ago

Woooosh. Yes, they're basing their dad joke on the headline and it's enought for the joke to work well.

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Who is upvoting this shit?

[–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 1 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (1 children)

The comment doesn't make much sense so people upvote in confusion

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 0 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

I've recently been finding that lemmy isn't much better than reddit.

It almost feels like a concerted effort to make this website shitty by injecting Trump defenders and fake leftists. Shit is fucking weird.

[–] PineRune@lemmy.world 30 points 1 week ago (2 children)

The only details released were that he was arrested for possession of underage pornography. That could be depicting someone who is 17 or 7. He has not been convicted of anything at this time.

[–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 4 points 6 days ago

Neither of those seem good...

[–] cjoll4@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Possession and dissemination.

Also, the definition of "POSSESSING A SEXUAL PERFORMANCE BY A CHILD" under New York Penal Law § 263.16 specifies "any performance which includes sexual conduct by a child less than sixteen years of age."

Yes, he hasn't been convicted of anything, but the accusation is that he shared sexually explicit images of a child who was 15 or younger.

[–] PineRune@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

Ah, I was assuming it was a federal charge since anything on the internet will fall into their jurisdiction.

[–] softcat@lemmy.ca 16 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Just when you thought it was safe to trust a biker, something like this happens. Now where will I get my crank and human trafficking?

[–] dumbass@leminal.space 17 points 1 week ago

Now where will I get my crank and human trafficking?

Go find a businessman, they'd know.

They just had an election for Gates' congressional seat. 😩

[–] Stalinwolf@lemmy.ca 11 points 1 week ago
[–] oakey66@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago

Every accusation is a confession example 1,344,512,275.

[–] morrowind@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I... guess he was trying to stop more of it. Regret?

load more comments (1 replies)