all 27 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 11 points 5 hours ago (1 child)
  • He shouldn’t be making movies. He should be in prison.

  • source
  • [–] 50 points 9 hours ago (7 children)

    I've seen brief ads and trailers for the movie and I still have no idea what it's about or why I might want to go see it. Tom Cruise plays an old guy who... does stuff, I guess? And John Goodman's in it? But, like... what is it? I genuinely don't know.

    I think the art of making a trailer has been lost somehow. My "return to monke" hot take is that trailers were better when they followed the "in a world where..." format, or the "...but now, he's about to find out..." format. At least they communicated what movies were about.

  • source
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 4 hours ago

    There's a "plot twist" about 20 minutes in that for some reason they don't want to spoil. Tom Cruise's rich white oil guy schtick is actually a theatre play being put on within the film, so there are some "normal" Cruise scenes about what's happening around the play. But all of that is inconsequential and has zero bearing on anything, so I don't know why it's being hidden in the promos.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 32 points 9 hours ago (2 children)

    "Rob Schneider is.... A carrot!" Is what came to mind from your quote.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 17 points 9 hours ago (1 child)

    But that's my point: the movie itself might be shit, but the trailer does the intended job of telling me what the movie's about: Rob Schneider turns into a carrot, wacky hijinks ensue. The South Park joke works as well as it does because that format works so well at making you instantly imagine the plot of the movie (and how inane it must be).

    If your movie's so shit that you think the only way to trick people into watching it is telling them less about it, you've already fucked up and deceptive/vague marketing won't save it.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 8 points 8 hours ago

    Most times if the movie is trash they put the best parts of it in a trailer, like that one single action sequence in a 90 minutes slugfest. When a bad trailer doesn't do even that I assume the marketing team didn't have anything of use in what they got sent by production. Or that the movie is designed to flop, like if a studio only wanted to keep a hold of this IP.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 8 points 6 hours ago

    Awww, poor scientology won't be able to abuse more slaves with the profits on Cruises lastest masturbatory effort. Real shame. I certainly hope no innocent people lead better lives because Cruise flopped at the box office.

  • source
  • [–] 18 points 8 hours ago* (2 children)

    I’m personally skipping this one because we already have a white deranged lunatic in office and I don’t need more of that vibe.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 7 hours ago*

    I assume this is probably the point, if its not highlighting the absurdity of the administration its missing a trick.

    Particularly releasing it right before the midterms makes this seem more plausible.

    But the political environment is so miserable there is no real need to impress that upon an audience, its overkill. Nobody needs it right now. The most a movie in that vein could do is depressing you further.

    I'll watch it on a streaming service at some point.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 11 points 7 hours ago

    I love Iñarritu's movies but I hate that he casted Tom Cruise. I'll skip this one, maybe I'll watch it on the high seas if the reviews keep up

  • source
  • [–] 6 points 7 hours ago

    I’m not seeing it because the commercials didn’t tell me at all what it was about. All I know is tom cruise is old or something. And yells alot. That’s all the commercials showed us.

  • source
  • [–] 9 points 8 hours ago

    Good. Fuck Tom Cruise.

  • source
  • [–] 14 points 9 hours ago

    It's a diet Iñárritu film with a finger-wagging moral about what the people want. That's not exactly a blockbuster recipe.

    I saw it. There were 7 people in the audience.

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 6 hours ago

    Glad to hear it. I feel bashed over the head by the advertising for it in spotify.

    Sometimes I get the ads back to back.

    Also just sick of spotify and am looking elsewhere to get my podcasts because there's so many ads injected in

  • source
  • [–] 9 points 10 hours ago

    White man exploits outrage, outraged when exploitation foiled.

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 8 hours ago

    It's expensive to go see movies nowadays. But also, I haven't seen jack about this movie! Doesn't sound like they made much effort to promote it...

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 7 hours ago (2 children)

    I only knew about the film because one of the cat youtubers I follow made an ad for it which. Didn't seem to bode well if your advertising involves paying an orange cat to do anything???

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 9 hours ago (1 child)

    I knew a lot of people who said this movie looked amazing and they were going to go see it. Guess the venn diagram shape with people I know who voted for Trump.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 4 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago)

    Did they know it was a different hard r?

    Looking at the plot summary, I hope they do go see it. I guess no one knowing what it was about might unironically help it do what it wants to do.

  • source
  • parent