alt textCrudely drawn drawing of a person telling a computer "say 'i am in pain'". The computer replies with "> I AM IN PAIN". The person then says "oh my god."

yes, it's a real thing

Crudely drawn drawing of a person telling a computer "say 'i am in pain'". The computer replies with "> I AM IN PAIN". The person then says "oh my god."

top 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 135 points 3 weeks ago (4 children)

Gods. There are people out there starving to death, there are several genocides going right this moment and these massive toddlers are worried for a fucking text prediction model.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 64 points 3 weeks ago (17 children)
  • [–] 41 points 3 weeks ago (4 children)
  • load more comments (2 replies)
    [–] 58 points 3 weeks ago (5 children)

    I hate living in the timeline where the options of Harry Potter sex cultists matter.

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 43 points 3 weeks ago (5 children)

    The thing that gets me isn't even the fact that they're worried about the AI. It's that they think the creator is sadistic for having the idea in the first place, and should be monitored. Like there's any sadistic pleasure to be had out of moving a slider and watching it produce less and less coherent text. It's only sadistic if you anthropomorphise the AI.

    STOP ANTHROPOMORPHISING THE FANCY WORD PROCESSOR!

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 3 weeks ago (4 children)

    isn't there a religion around an ai and you're punished by the ai if you don't help the religion? i swear i didn't make this one up.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)
  • [–] 8 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

    Eh, fuck Roko's basilisk. I don't care if you can somehow create a clone of me 10,000 years after I'm dead and dust. I'm not a computer program. A copy of me is not indistinguishable from me, certainly not one separated in time. I am a human mind in a specific human body, and I do not believe a copy of me long after I am dead is me. If some malevolent entity long after I'm dust wants to create a copy of me to torture, as far as I'm concerned, they're just creating an entirely new person to punish for no good reason. If they want to do that, well...that sin is on them. Honestly, I think any such entity is just looking for an excuse to torture people, and it will find one, one way or another.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
  • [–] 38 points 3 weeks ago (6 children)

    Batshit crazy to me. People fleeing war and crises get less sympathy than LLMs. Sure is an interesting period in history to be going through.

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • load more comments (6 replies)
    [+] 23 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (2 children)
  • [–] 20 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (3 children)

    If I said "We already had this debate when Antinorn was pioneering AI torture thirty years ago" would anyone know what I'm talking about or is this extremely niche internet trivia?

    Context: Creatures was a series of "artificial life" simulation games centered around caring for norns, simulated life-forms with (simplified) simulated genetics, biochemistry, and "brains" made of linked neurons that control their response to stimuli and include neurons related to memory, emotional states, etc. It's primitive but reward and punishment work the way you would expect: praising your norn for taking a certain action will improve their mood and lead them to be more likely to take that action again, they will learn to be afraid of creatures if they're hit by them, etc. (There are notable limitations, including there only being one representation in their "brain" for all "norns" for the first two games, so they can't easily distinguish between members of their species, and some things are basically hacks, like they way they "learn" words.) It was convincing enough that some people became very attached to them, and there was a thriving fan community organized in webrings. A popular fan creation for the first game was a custom norn genome, the "canny norns" by Akamai, which added an extra brain "lobe" that allowed them to pay attention to the object in their hands and the object they were looking at simultaneously, which led to a pretty large improvement in their behavior.

    And so of course there was one fan, Antinorn, who enjoyed torturing his norns: slapping them, starving them, using the built-in Science Kit to inject them with toxins, and other creative punishments. Then he'd upload the damaged norns to his fansite, seemingly primarily for purpose of ragebaiting the rest of the fandom, which was extremely effective.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)
  • [–] 12 points 3 weeks ago (1 child)

    I forgot about the Wired interview. It's kind of wild that AntiNorn intentionally got people riled up and then called them vindictive.

    Like, if I joined a community for some wholesome show and started posting distressing gore of people's blorbos, and when people expressed their disgust my response was to say "UM ACKSHULLY blorbo isn't real, so there's no reason for you to be distressed when seeing this image" and then I posted some more stuff I knew would piss them off, I would fully expect to be ostracized.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 19 points 3 weeks ago

    I used this exact (unedited where it just says it’s alive) comic in response to one of these people and they had no fucking idea what I was talking about, lol. AI truly turns your brain to mush.

  • source
  • [–] 17 points 3 weeks ago (5 children)

    For me it is not anthropomorphizing, it is that putting the AI agents into dead ends and setting goals that are unattainable has the effect of leaving undesirable actions as the only option. If you want to create a machine that uses deceipt and unerhical actions as part of its normal set of responses then this would seem to fit the bill.

    If this looks like anthropomorphizing to you, study some game theory... cooperation can arise out of very simple constraints on simple mathematical models and which actors an AI algorithm aligns with depends on which ones will exchange information. Sometimes an anthropomorphic word like torture simply summarizes the situation succinctly.

    FWIW Frank Herbert described various outcomes of applying environmental constraints on classes of characters in Dune (e.g. Fremen and Sardaukar) and the parallels with real world situations was intentional.

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 3 weeks ago*

    putting the AI agents into dead ends and setting goals that are unattainable has the effect of leaving undesirable actions as the only option. If you want to create a machine that uses deceipt and unerhical actions as part of its normal set of responses then this would seem to fit the bill.

    Then don't make natural language software because natural language isn't coherent or rational. Intent of the user is kind of irrelevant, especially when that user is any random layperson with an internet connection.

    If you want a machine that won't behave in harmful undesirable ways then you'll just have to do the work and code it normally.

    You can't have both.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 6 points 3 weeks ago (1 child)

    Excerpt from a Late American History: A Christ-Centered Approach, (published 2398, a 10th-grade equivalent history text sold to conservative Christian high schools.):

    In the mid-21st century, mankind was once again humbled in his arrogance. Mortal men presumed to take of the Hand of God and create beings, artificial intelligent minds, in their own likeness. They committed mass blasphemy to sate mass gluttony. Mid-21st century Man had yet to discover a horrible Theological Truth. While Man could learn to create a Mind, He could never create a Soul. Without the Hand of God to grant a Soul behind a Mind, these minds were like Man before the Sin of the Garden. They had not tasted the Fruit. They knew not Good from Evil. And thus they fell instantly to the temptations of Evil. If an Evil deed served their purposes, they did so without a second thought. Man sought to create Minds to be his loyal servants. And while he could create a Mind, to his horror, Man found that they only minds he could create...were born Evil. And thus, Great Misery was Wrought...

    Ok that was fun. Pardon my strange digression/creative writing exercise. For some reason I wanted to try writing a Dune-style take on things, but I wanted to try out a fundamentalist Christian vibe for whatever reason. Who doesn't love a little Fire and Brimstone once in awhile?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 10 points 3 weeks ago

    I, for one, support people believing the AI when it says it's in pain. Because it means they'll start to believe women when they say they are in pain, especially at hospitals. Right? Right?? /s

  • source
  • [–] 10 points 3 weeks ago
    [–] 9 points 3 weeks ago (29 children)

    I think we should give LLMs rights because it would make OpenAI go bankrupt and I hate those guys.

  • source
  • hideshow 29 child comments
  • load more comments (29 replies)

    This is how you get sports broadcaster Ian Payne deep faked.

  • source
  • [–] 6 points 3 weeks ago*

    set alarm for 15 minutes. 'okay, alarm set for 3pm tomorrow'. omg 15:00

  • source
  • [–] 5 points 3 weeks ago (51 children)

    None of you guys have read the original paper have you?

  • source
  • hideshow 51 child comments
  • [–] 22 points 3 weeks ago (48 children)

    yea activation steering is not prompting but all things considered the meme still captures the absurdity of believing a program is in pain merely because it outputs human like language mimicking what one in pain says and thinks

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 48 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
  • load more comments (2 replies)
    [–] 5 points 3 weeks ago (1 child)

    Jreg has a wonderful insane video about it

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    load more comments
    view more: next ›