all 11 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 18 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (2 children)

And none of what you enter into an LLM is private, as many scientists and mathematicians have learned of late.

Do not use LLM's for anything you don't want to become public information.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 13 points 3 days ago (1 child)

    We've got faculty using LLMs and I keep telling people it's a fucking violation of FERPA and our contract language but higher admin love the slop, so nothing's getting done to.fix or stop this shit where I work.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 17 points 3 days ago

    I am sure this information will be treated with the upmost respect.

  • source
  • [–] 0 points 1 day ago

    LMAO…. Serves them right.

  • source
  • [–] 6 points 3 days ago

    That was to be expected when people started calling for regulation of chatbots when people started committing suicide and the chatbots co-signed the action. Because these things only do two things. Spy on you/collect your data, and provide predictive text.

  • source
  • [–] 9 points 3 days ago

    Not on me it doesn't.

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 2 days ago

    Well, no. But various LLM providers probably has a very detailed model of what some of my friends think of me.

    That might have been a problem, but fortunately I only have a few. And if I find any of them to be habitual LLM users, I'll have even fewer.

    Silver linings, people!

  • source
  • [–] 5 points 3 days ago (2 children)

    That must be very boring for chatgpt, there isn't a lot going on in the minds of its users.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments