President Donald Trump has said he does not "give a damn" about potential criticism of his remarks boasting that the United States is making a "fortune" from high oil prices, as American motorists continue to face elevated gasoline costs.

all 43 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 85 points 4 days ago (10 children)

Does anyone remember when politicians actually pretended to work for the people?

I’m older now, and the memory feels dim, but if I sit and think, I can just barely remember a time when politicians realized that they worked for the people.

  • source
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] 51 points 4 days ago (1 child)

    Citizens United was the point of no return. The people became powerless wage slaves with a mouse whisper voice to influence anything. Corporotacracy achieved adulthood and the people's slide toward slavery crossed the event horizon.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 38 points 4 days ago (3 children)

    Yes, I remember as a kid Carter getting elected. Didn't understand the politics at the time, but he seemed a nice guy.

    You know what is really interesting to watch? Look up old TV political debates from the 60s and 70s. Where they actually debated issues. It's amazing.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 13 points 4 days ago (2 children)

    You don't even have to go that far back.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 20 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 child)

    The last one I can remember was the Obama/McCain election in ‘08. There was plenty of mudslinging from the media, (and by extension, the rabble who gets all of their news from a single source), but their actual debates were extremely respectful by today’s standards.

    Notably, that was also the last presidential election to happen before the infamous Citizens United SCOTUS decision in 2010, which allowed corporations to spend tons of money on political campaigns.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 4 days ago* (1 child)

    No. I do however remember questioning people's sanity when they talked about stupid and incompetent politicians when it was very obvious that they were corrupt but knew very well what they were doing.

    Decades later not much has changed. The malicious working against voters has become even more obvious and people still pretend that those corrupt shitbags are mostly just dumb and don't know any better.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 74 points 4 days ago (2 children)

    Our country is making hundreds of billions of dollars because of what's happened in the Middle East

    When he says 'our country' what he means is 'the ruling elite'... he says the same thing when talking about data centers. He says the reason we need data centers is because it's making people so much money. He just never says which people.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 37 points 4 days ago

    "We're making a fortune!" ...Yes, directly from the American people. "I don't care about Americans running out of money, we're getting rich off you losers!"

  • source
  • [–] 13 points 4 days ago (1 child)

    LOL! Just remember...In 1998, Donald Trump said he would run as a Republican in a presidential campaign because they are the "dumbest group of voters." At least the orange asswipe got that right and the Russians understood this too. The same applies to the vast majority of right-wing political parties and their voters.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 6 points 3 days ago

    Translation: US = stock market = me.

    Trump doesn't care because he's making a fortune.

  • source
  • [–] 19 points 4 days ago (6 children)

    I just did a rewatch of From and without too many spoilers this really reminds me of it.

    One of the leaders got the group to accept something just because he said so. Later he is going to try it again and gets reality checked first.

    Someone told him people didn't accept it the first time, they just let it go because they had faith he had a reason even if he wasn't explaining it

    Between the two events, he had lost the people's faith, and it wasn't going to work again.

    trump claiming this now, is more likely to drive support away than reassure his voters who are already doubting him.

    He's pushing too far because he thinks it'll keep working, not understanding that even his voters have their limits.

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 4 days ago (1 child)

    I hope you're right about people leaving him, but after everything he's done and/or enabled, if these people haven't left his circles yet, I fear they never will. He's basically given them a pass to go mask off. Not only enabling, but encouraging their bad behavior. I don't see them letting go of their "savior".

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 7 points 4 days ago

    Same here. Trump's followers are mostly people who spent a lifetime accepting the contradictions of their religious beliefs. I don't think they'll have any trouble continuing to believe that he knows what he's doing.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 4 points 4 days ago

    Fool me once, shame on you (and me, I obviously should have known better). Fool me twice, shame on me even harder because I'm obviously a dumbass. Fool me thrice, I'm a pedoloving brain damaged trump sucker who can't be helped and am responsible for wrecking this nation but damn those libs who actually do care about me as a person are so owned!

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 3 points 4 days ago (1 child)

    “The survey also found 63% of the public is pessimistic about the current state of the economy, including 35% of Republicans, a six-point point increase from July and the highest percentage of Republicans with negative views about the economy during either of Trump’s terms.”

    2/3 of Republicans think he’s doing fine.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 0 points 4 days ago

    think he’s doing

    Pessimism/optimism is about the future, not current reality.

    2/3s think it'll still work out, but a third of his base don't

    That's huge, literally more than it's ever been, right before the midterms that can decide House/Senate.

    And if we pull one or both, there won't be any pressure to go with Schumer/Jefferies from a corrupt DNC. We can see actual leadership again.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 16 points 4 days ago (7 children)

    At this point I wonder if there's literally anything he could say or do to make his voters realize he doesn't give a shit about them.

  • source
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 4 days ago*

    There are two main things that change people's minds: Peer pressure, and trauma.

    We're social creatures and we take cues from people we trust. The right wing has done an excellent (and horrifying) job of creating unified in-groups for their followers. They have fox news. They have talk radio. They have churches. They have also demonized their opposition - "ivory tower elites", "coastal elites", queers, commies, etc. Many people will struggle to change their mind when everyone around them hasn't.

    There was a thing I was reading about a while ago, about flat-earthers. A bunch of them got shown a lot of evidence to contradict their beliefs. They all stuck to their flat-earth nonsense, except one of them. The guy who'd started dating someone sane, and hanging out with her friends. He changed his mind. In large part because he no longer saw the flat-earth community as such a vital part of his in-group. Or so the author argued.

    The other way is trauma. If something really horrific happens to someone, they might reevaluate. But if they're still in the same social groups, they're likely to fall back into their old ways.

    In the book "Dying of Whiteness", the author interviewed a variety of people. Among them were gun violence survivors. There was one passage where a woman said something like, yeah, easy access to guns is why her son died. Maybe he shouldn't have been able to just go get a gun and shoot himself. But, she said, she would never say that to her peers.

    So, in short: No, not really. The social groups carrying maga identity are self-reinforcing. They're all looking at their peers, who are all still maga.

    https://theoatmeal.com/comics/believe is a good comic about some of the same ideas, too.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 4 days ago (2 children)

    He actually has a very low approval rating now.

    https://www.natesilver.net/p/trump-approval-ratings-nate-silver-bulletin

    According to the New York Times, Trump has the second lowest approval rating heading into the midterms since 1946, behind only Harry Truman.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 14 points 4 days ago (1 child)
  • [–] 6 points 4 days ago

    shits pants

  • source
  • [–] 8 points 4 days ago

    Hmmm... Massive tax cuts... Increased spending on gas/oil by the people... 401k not guaranteed to be invested in oil companies...

    Who is getting rich here? I would doubt even the us government is seeing a meaningful income since we subsidize and cut taxes on the oil companies...

    ...oh right, Trump is highly invested in oil companies. The only person that matters. Right.

  • source
  • [–] 5 points 4 days ago

    So that means the US national debt is finally going down and we averted a dollar crash crisis which will sling the whole economic world in disarray, right? RIGHT?!

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 4 days ago

    Bold strategy. 🤡

  • source
  • [+] 1 point 4 days ago
    [–] 1 point 4 days ago
    [–] 1 point 4 days ago

    US but not us.

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 4 days ago

    well of course. its always been about growing he slice at the highest end.

  • source