top 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 3 points 8 hours ago

How did they know at any given point that it was still there? Wouldn’t they have to interact with it to be sure, causing an explosion and annihilating it? The explosion would be incredibly small with just one particle. Is the lack of explosion their only evidence that they had contained it? I’m stumped as to what it actually means to have one particle like this. How can you even know what temperature it is without interacting with it? And how do you interact with it without destroying it?

  • source
  • [–] 11 points 15 hours ago

    Your move antimatter

  • source
  • [–] 13 points 17 hours ago

    So it's potty trained and can do tricks now?

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 14 hours ago

    -"Free Anti Matt Er!"

  • source
  • [–] 16 points 1 day ago

    I wonder if it likes one scientist over another scientist

  • source
  • [–] 100 points 1 day ago (25 children)

    This is actually really exciting! I fucking love anti-matter, always been fascinated by it.

    If anti-matter can exist, why is our universe made of matter? This is the Baryon Asymmetry question that this research seeks to answer. The team has proven they can isolate a single positron. The next step is to measure it to as much accuracy as they have with the electron. Perhaps they will find differences!

    Summer '25 CERN showed that anti-matter baryons (protons, neutrons, etc) decay differently - link. So there's a good chance they might find something!

    Would love to actually see anti-matter but that's a long way off. Really hope anti-matter likes to stick together and we could actually build atoms out of it. Would be crazy to study the properties of anti-water! Maybe that's just science fiction. In any case, very excited for the coming research!

  • source
  • hideshow 25 child comments
  • [–] 13 points 1 day ago (4 children)

    If you love antimatter. eat banana. It contains traces of antimatter.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 13 points 1 day ago* (12 children)

    "Would love to actually see anti-matter" - are you being literal here? because that would require a vacuum between your eyes and antimatter that emits at a visible frequency. Not entirely impossible, but detection and recording of an anti-hydrogen transition wavelength is more easily achievable. This might be no more than an LCD display indicating a non-zero number though. Exciting for sure, but not necessarily a visual spectacle.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 12 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 22 hours ago (5 children)

    You did not just write "LCD display". Feel ashamed! >:V

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 15 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago)

    Yes, to highlight how dull witnessing antimatter could actually be for a non-scientist. LOL. -- Oh crap, I just poured granola in my coffee instead of my yogurt parfait.

    Edit: ah yes well we don't see many LCDs anymore so I give a hint for touchscreen kids who might not know what LCD means (not Least Common Denominator).

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 9 points 1 day ago* (5 children)

    Yeah very literal. Would need millions of atoms of the stuff. Actually maybe that's too dangerous lol

    We have managed to see a single strontium atom - link. Maybe that's attainable with anti-matter.

    But yeah you're right, capturing an anti-hyrdogen emission would be an huge achievement itself!

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 1 day ago (3 children)

    Make the glass of anti water on the moon just in case heh.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 13 hours ago

    Just for fun I did the Maths.

    Rougly a 100ml glass of anti-water has 100g of anti-water (assuming same density as normal pure water, which is around 1).

    When anti-mater contacts mater it transforms into energy according to E = mc^2^ were E is in Joule and m is in kg.

    For 100g of anti-water to turn into energy in this way it also needs 100g of normal mater, so the number is doubled.

    Using the rounded 300,000,000 m/s for the constant c, the energy released by the annihilation of a 100ml glass of anti-water (and the matching 100g of normal mater) would be 1.8e+16 Joules, equivalent to around 4.3 Megatons of TNT.

    So basically a regular nuclear bomb.

    PS: I actually expected it would be much more energy before I did the maths.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • [–] 15 points 1 day ago (5 children)

    I always assume it's the same reason why are have mostly right handed people. It's just that the scales tipped at some point and it had to go down one way from that point.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 23 points 1 day ago (2 children)

    Yeah probably but the important bit is why!

    Good point about right handedness! That is actually quite fascinating as well because in most other primates it's a 50/50 split.

    Turns out walking is probably the major factor and our brains created the split - link. Still more questions though lol

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • [–] 5 points 1 day ago (1 child)

    I think the universe actually is perfectly balanced between antimatter and matter, but variation across space emerged as space expanded and our entire observable universe happens to be in a pocket where there was more matter than antimatter.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 21 hours ago

    Sounds reasonable. Assuming matter and antimatter split into equal parts that would have to be the case. I'm not sure if annihilation is a perfect process. Assuming energy density creates separation of energy into matter and antimatter of equal parts and no sudden annihilation happens, that would most certainly result in such a conclusion.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 120 points 1 day ago (2 children)

    how did this get past the ethics committee

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 28 points 1 day ago (3 children)

    I wonder what they called it,since they tamed it.

    I'm thinking Anton if it's a boy particle, Antonia if it's a girl, and Matty if it's nonbinary.

    Perhaps Antti (Niemi) if it's Finnish 🤷🏻

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 60 points 1 day ago (6 children)

    Poor particle did nothing bad

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 24 points 1 day ago (3 children)

    This is anti-electron astroturfing right here, verging on hate speech.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 32 points 1 day ago

    Not gonna be impressed until they teach it to fetch.

  • source
  • [–] 22 points 1 day ago (1 child)

    If movies have taught me anything, that particle isn’t tame. It’s just waiting for it’s moment.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 19 points 1 day ago

    Antimatter matters!

  • source
  • [–] 10 points 1 day ago

    Did they ask for consent?

  • source
  • load more comments
    view more: next ›