Senator Chris Murphy says he has been briefed on the US's plan to restart the war on Iran, calling it "insane" and saying it would lead to a "devastating escalation".

"You've heard a preview that it would be a short-duration plan. I'll just say this: their plan is insane," Murphy said, speaking at an event organised by the Middle East Institute in Washington, DC, on Wednesday.

"It will lead to devastating escalation and the likely destruction of our commitment to the rule of law."

...

"There's been open reporting as to what we may be planning and the civilian infrastructure we may be targeting," Murphy said.

"They've been asked by the president to develop a plan - whether they believe it will work or not, I do not know. But the plan that they have developed will lead, in my view, to a prolongment and an escalation of this war that will be devastating for our security interests.

"We are seeing the president ready another devastating military campaign after the election, just as illegal as the first iteration was at the time, where Americans are fed up with this war."

Archived at https://web.archive.org/web/20261030120117/https://www.middleeasteye.net/news/us-senator-briefed-trump-plan-restart-war-iran-says-proposal-insane

top 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 4 points 1 hour ago

Insane? So you're saying it's approved and ready to go?

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 1 hour ago

    If the insanity includes a boots on the ground invasion, every single MAGA fucknut should be told they will "be protecting the 2nd Amendment from the evil Iranians" and volunteer for 11B. That alone should motivate the idiots. However, I highly doubt it, because the US military does not indicate massive troop and equipment movements with positions along the Iranian border.

  • source
  • [–] 6 points 2 hours ago (2 children)

    They will say it’s insane. And bad. And worrying. But they won’t do a thing about it.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 hour ago* (1 child)

    Controlled opposition. Not all of them, but enough, particularly at the national level. The 2021-2023 majority wasn't enough. The 2009-2011 super majority somehow wasn't enough. Establishment-aligned candidates run on milquetoast platforms addressing only a handful of token issues, and often just to roll policy back to much how it was prior to Republican lawmaking. Not the real, sweeping change clearly needed - because that would harm the financial interests of their primary donors.

    FWIW, I'm not an American. This is just what I saw whilst living there and what we see in the news. Constantly.

    Since criticizing the wrong team is often met with the bizarre assumption one is a Russian troll encouraging Americans not to vote: go vote for the best candidate, but remember that political engagement shouldn't begin and end at the ballot box. The US needs far more than whinging online.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 0 points 11 minutes ago

    Obama enjoyed a majority for about 6 months until jim crow 2.0 electorate maps Gerry rigged far right types into office. I don't know what majority you are talking about during 2021-2023. Yeah we have corporate democrats but we also have very clear opposition on the left. Controlled opposition is defeatist conspiracy theory half baked in truths. We can do better.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 6 points 5 hours ago (1 child)

    Well, of course the plan is insane. It's Trumps' plan, afterall.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 7 points 8 hours ago (2 children)

    another distraction just for the midterms and epstein files.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 13 hours ago (1 child)

    Ok. Alright. We are gonna - we're gonna go out there during this break and we are gonna come back with a plan. We're gonna come back with a plan for you. It's a 45 day plan. 45 days to get us back on track. 45 points. It's a 45 day/45 point. One point per day. We get the 45 points we are back in business. And you can take that to the bank. And Limo Lady, we are going completely carbon neutral. I love you, New York! You. You.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 6 points 12 hours ago (1 child)

    Nihilist death cults gonna nihilist death cult.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 93 points 1 day ago (2 children)

    Lol. Like anyone still believes they are operating within the rule of law.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 29 points 22 hours ago (6 children)

    If only there was a body of people with the power to stop the madman.

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 13 points 21 hours ago (5 children)

    If only approximately half of that body didn't support this fascist bullshit, though.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 12 hours ago (2 children)

    If you include non-voters, it's really only a third of the country that supports it. And if you include ineligible voters, it's closer to a fifth.

    Fascism isn't popular. Don't give them power by repeating their lies that it is.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 8 hours ago (1 child)

    If you include non-voters it's more than a third of the country supporting it. If you don't vote against it you are giving it tacit support.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 1 hour ago

    That's true in the aspect of those non-voters can't deny their culpability in what they refused to vote against.

    However it does not hold so far as to assert that this administration has their assent. Two-thirds support would literally be a mandate from the people; don't let them believe their delusion that they have one.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (2 replies)
  • [–] 47 points 1 day ago (16 children)

    So I assume this either means they're planning a boots on the ground campaign in Iran or using nukes.

    I also assume the reason they fired the planning guy from Pentagon a few days ago is because he wouldn't plan this for them?

  • source
  • hideshow 16 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 12 hours ago (1 child)

    Does anyone remember what the goal of this war was even supposed to be? Like what were they trying to accomplish in the first place? What is this planned escalation supposed to accomplish that the first one didn't?

    I know the real answer. Bibi said to, epstein honeypot, distraction from the files, hegseth needed to feel tough, etc...

    I mean what are they pretending the reason for this war is?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 19 points 21 hours ago (4 children)

    We don't have the resources for a ground invasion. And nukes are extremely unlikely.

    What is more likely, and what the senator appears to be referring to, is bombing campaign aimed at destroying the vital civilian infrastructure of the country. Think power plants, bridges, ports, water treatment facilities, etc.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 12 hours ago (3 children)

    They were already targeting those...

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 2 hours ago (2 children)
  • [–] 1 point 1 hour ago (1 child)

    Oh god. Iran has some of the oldest heritage sites in the world. Early Zarathustrian fire temples and stuff like that.

    I know modern infrastructure is important too; bridges, hospitals, universities, bazaars, etc., not to mention the human lives themselves. But when something is thousands of years old it's worth preserving in its own right. It's always a shame when monuments are destroyed.

    Hopefully someone manages to stop this "insane plan" before it causes more destruction...

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 12 points 21 hours ago (5 children)

    From what they've talked about before and from what this article says, they're talking about bombing civilian infrastructure like bridges, power generation. One assumes not hospitals, but if a couple slip in there, I'm sure it'll be "accidental".

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 21 hours ago (3 children)
  • [–] 9 points 21 hours ago (2 children)

    I used to think we were above such things. And I think that generally speaking we did try, although not very hard. Civilian casualties in Iraq/Afghanistan, for example. I'm pretty sure we generally didn't go out doing much of that on purpose, although I know we sure didn't try hard to avoid it.

    Russia is a step beyond, for now, as they actively target civilians. Whereas, for example, I think the school bombing we did was stupidity/ineptitude.

    And even now, I don't think we're going to target civilian housing or hospitals or schools purposefully, but we're getting a step close if we do target civilian infrastructure.

    But when you get down to this level of detail in the "not as bad as" discussion...... it's getting pretty bad.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
  • load more comments (3 replies)
    [–] 8 points 18 hours ago

    The only way this war can even end is when the US side of who is handling the war is just dead and replaced. Israel too.

  • source
  • [–] 35 points 1 day ago (1 child)

    What's the over/under that said plans include nukes

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 33 points 1 day ago
    [–] 17 points 23 hours ago (2 children)

    US head of military planning was fired this week for no reason.

    destruction of our commitment to the rule of law

    Means mass civilian/infrastructure casualties. Beyond evil, the insanity accusation is Iran's strong retaliation capability which can delay "normal energy supplies" for another 2+ years.

    There is still a likelihood that it is a ploy to extract more benefits from "GCC allies" for Trump+cronies to avoid their devastation. This has lasted 6 months though.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 29 points 1 day ago

    So much winning...... 🫠

  • source
  • [–] 12 points 23 hours ago (1 child)

    Anything to distract from more Epstein Files… nothing is beyond him

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 18 points 1 day ago

    "our commitment to the rule of law"

    Mr. Senator, please provide evidence for that statement. You can do it from the East Wing and bring the Epstein Files with you while you do it.

  • source
  • [–] 17 points 1 day ago (1 child)

    LOL. "Commitment to the rule of law". I think that was ended a while back.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    load more comments
    view more: next ›