this post was submitted on 07 Apr 2025
18 points (100.0% liked)

Microblog Memes

8830 readers
1516 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

Rules:

  1. Please put at least one word relevant to the post in the post title.
  2. Be nice.
  3. No advertising, brand promotion or guerilla marketing.
  4. Posters are encouraged to link to the toot or tweet etc in the description of posts.

Related communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ThatGuyNamedZeus@feddit.org 3 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (7 children)

I don't believe Elon is the richest man in the world. Whoever the richest person in the world is, common men and women wouldn't be allowed to know who that is

Also, citizens united just legalized the bribery, the bribery will still happen with or without it

[–] merc@sh.itjust.works 3 points 4 months ago (1 children)

It depends on how you define wealth. Vladimir Putin has de-facto control over all the natural resources of the world's biggest country. He doesn't have much money in bank accounts under his own name, and even if he did, his ability to spend that money would be limited because of sanctions. I would bet that if he wanted anything in the world, he could get it.

Then there's the English royal family. Technically, they actually own all the land in England, Wales and Northern Ireland. When you buy land in those places, you're actually leasing it from the crown. They can't technically sell that land either though, so their ownership of it is moot. They have more direct control of some of the most prime real estate in England, and get direct rent from those leases. There are some legal above-board descriptions of what they acknowledge owning. However, I wouldn't be surprised if there are holdings across the world that are more secret. The British crown controlled almost half the world less than a century ago. I would be shocked if when the British empire shrunk, they didn't sneak some holdings into secret shell companies. But, the amount they can actually spend is pretty limited. The fully legit holdings are very carefully monitored, as is all their spending. If they spent money they're not supposed to have, someone would investigate.

The people who are actually on the Forbes rich list are people who hold stock in public corporations. That information is fully public, so there's no way for them to hide their wealth. People who have wealth through private companies and real-estate holdings generally don't want to appear on those rich lists. They know it just makes them a target.

Having said that, hundreds of billions is a lot of money. Musk has roughly $1000 per American, and it's exclusively his. Many empires in history had control of more "treasure", but it was the empire's wealth, and not separated out for the emperor to use as he pleased. Musk is in the unique position that his riches are entirely his, and he doesn't need to share anything with the country's treasury. So, I'd be surprised if there are many people with more wealth that's truly their own wealth.

Also, I don't think anybody knows who the richest person is. It's not like it's a secret being kept from the common folk. The rich people know more or less the same as we do. It's not like they are open and honest with each-other. There are probably a lot of billionaires who manage to keep their name out of the news, but probably very few of them are centi-billionaires. That's just an absurd amount of money, and it's hard to control that much wealth and not leave a trace.

[–] pHr34kY@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago

they actually own all the land in England, Wales and Northern Ireland. When you buy land in those places, you're actually leasing it from the crown.

I live in Australia and I technically live on crown land.

[–] Jumpingspiderman@lemmy.world 2 points 4 months ago

It’s probably PooTin anyway

[–] disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago (2 children)

Honestly, it’s probably a Saudi.

[–] anomnom@sh.itjust.works 1 points 4 months ago

Or royalty in UAE, Bahrain, or somewhere.

[–] ThatGuyNamedZeus@feddit.org 0 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Whoever it is, where ever he or she is from. It's probably a member of the WEF. Maybe that old droopy german guy, but most likely it's someone much more reclusive we've never seen

[–] merc@sh.itjust.works 1 points 4 months ago

The WEF is just TED talks for the obscenely rich. Conspiracy theorists give it way too much power.

[–] SexualPolytope@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 4 months ago (3 children)

It's probably Putin or Mohammed bin Salman, if we're talking about how much money they can personally move around. Or maybe even Trump, since there seems to be no one in the US to stop him from doing whatever the fuck he wants.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] danc4498@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago

That dude that invented bitcoin probably

[–] MNByChoice@midwest.social 1 points 4 months ago (1 children)

The bribery should be "illegal". It makes it more negative when we hear about it.

[–] ThatGuyNamedZeus@feddit.org 0 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Bribery happened before it was legal constantly, to think that making it illegal again would stop it from happening is just silly.

the elected officals, kings, queens and what have you of the world aren't the ones who run everything. The people who REALLY control everything are totally unknown to the common man

[–] CileTheSane@lemmy.ca 1 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Making it illegal let's you do something about it when people are caught making and collecting bribes.

[–] ThatGuyNamedZeus@feddit.org 0 points 4 months ago (2 children)

It was happening long before it was made legal and nothing was ever done to stop it.

[–] ExtantHuman@lemm.ee 1 points 4 months ago

Because everyone knows, if it was allowed to happen in the past, we're not allowed to ever stop it from happening in the future ...

[–] MNByChoice@midwest.social 1 points 4 months ago

Loads of politicians went to prison.

Making it illegal limits how much it happens. It doesn't mean it doesn't happen.

[–] bulwark@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Richest man that the IRS knows about

[–] ThatGuyNamedZeus@feddit.org 1 points 4 months ago

the twist there is the IRS knows, but they're never going to speak a word of who it could be, because they'll all be ki...I mean go to prison and kill themselves!...Just like everyone who has something damning to testify about

[–] AcidicBasicGlitch@lemm.ee 2 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Yup citizens United was the beginning of the fucking end.

[–] apfelwoiSchoppen@lemmy.world 2 points 4 months ago (1 children)

That and the Patriot Act. W's media image softening in the past few years has been particularly gross.

[–] Lemminary@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago

Reminds me of the suspension of habeas corpus. That alone was bone-chilling.

[–] don@lemm.ee 1 points 4 months ago (1 children)

A little less conversation, a lotta more action. Direct action.

[–] toy_boat_toy_boat@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago

come on, man! they had SIGNS! they CHANTED! what more could you possibly ask of a country of fat idiots?

[–] FreakinSteve@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago

Great. Thanks, Robert. Wonderful idea. Can't believe we hadn't thought of that already. Such insight. Much brain.

[–] Etterra@discuss.online 1 points 4 months ago (2 children)

On the up side, nobody's stock portfolio is hurting right now more than Musky's is.

[–] PDFuego@lemmy.world 2 points 4 months ago

His stock portfolio is still worth more than any of us will see in a hundred thousand lifetimes. Doesn't feel like an up side.

[–] Noodle07@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago

Tesla stock still up 5% from 1 month ago 🤷

[–] electric_nan@lemmy.ml 1 points 4 months ago

As long as we have billionaires, we'll have rulings like "citizens united".

[–] PunnyName@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago

And yes, the CEO of Dropout, Sam Reich, is Robert's son.

[–] Jumpingspiderman@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago (1 children)

The only things about Elon I can think of that would please me more would be dead broke Elon. Or just plain dead Elon.

[–] voldage@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago (2 children)

Well, imagine him being broke, homeless, despised by everyone and treated like interacting with him could lead you to the exclusion from the society. Warms your heart, doesn't it? I don't want him dead, I wish him worse. I want him thanking bums for pissing on him so he doesn't lose more fingers to the frostbite and cursing himself for pushing for cutting social safety net.

[–] Jumpingspiderman@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago

You have changed my mind. Thank you.

[–] unphazed@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago

I imagine him broke and doing Cameos and everyone makimg him say "Hello my daughter! Sorry your father is such a nazi piece of shit. You deserved a better father."

[–] Tarquinn2049@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago

What's even more crazy is I bet it flashed through his head that it was "unfair" that even 25 million wasn't enough to buy such a small election.

[–] MrMakabar@slrpnk.net 1 points 4 months ago

Elon Musk obtained $213billion last year. Given a 40 hour work week, that means the $25million is about 15min of work. I kind of doubt he actually works that long, but I do not want to be too mean.

[–] rhacer@lemmy.world 0 points 4 months ago (2 children)

How does one overturn citizens united without overturning the Constitution?

[–] MNByChoice@midwest.social 1 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Interpretation of the constitution changes with the times.

[–] rhacer@lemmy.world 0 points 4 months ago (1 children)

And exactly how do you reinterpret The Constitution to reach your goal of overturning Citizens United?

[–] AcidicBasicGlitch@lemm.ee 1 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Probably by getting judges who are simply willing to acknowledge corporations aren't people.

[–] MNByChoice@midwest.social 1 points 4 months ago

Exactly this.

load more comments (1 replies)