this post was submitted on 07 Jul 2025
976 points (99.0% liked)

Science Memes

15631 readers
2347 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] LovableSidekick@lemmy.world 1 points 4 hours ago

Only thing to do now is turn around and chomp 'em!

[–] AeonFelis@lemmy.world 48 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

Persistence predation is the only way I can manage to take my cats to the vet.

[–] Alcoholicorn@mander.xyz 8 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

Did you try just picking them up and having a towel or blanket underneath in case they want to dig their claws into something, and hand in their shoulders in case they try to escape? That's what Ive done for years and it is so much less stressful on everyone involved.

[–] AeonFelis@lemmy.world 12 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago) (1 children)

The problem is getting a hold of them in the first place. They just bolt from one hiding place to another, and I say "hiding place" but they're not as much "hidden" as "hard to reach when you are a human-sized human". The only reason I eventually manage to catch them is that ambush predators get tired quicker than persistence predators.

[–] Alcoholicorn@mander.xyz 4 points 9 hours ago (2 children)

How do they know youre taking them to the vet?

[–] AeonFelis@lemmy.world 10 points 8 hours ago

The hate being picked up in general, even if there is no threat of vet, so they'll struggle to get out of my arms and if they succeed - I've lost the element of surprise.

Also - I have two cats, and if I need to take both to vet then even if I manage to place one in a carrier he'll alert the other that something is wrong.

[–] a_wild_mimic_appears@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago) (8 children)

Mine know that it's vet time the second i get the transport boxes out of storage. I have to be pretty silent while they sleep so they don't notice that, or else i have to use persistance predation too.

e: a possible workaround is to store the transport boxes in different places everytime, but my options are limited.

[–] Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world 1 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

Take them nice places in the box.

I'm gonna wine and dine them next time :-)

[–] zaperberry@lemmy.ca 3 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

Hey I don't have cats so it might be a bit different, but I've had a few dogs over the years and I figure it would be similar. Your cats probably associate the carriers with going to the vet which it sounds like they're not a fan of. Their thought process is probably carrier = vet = no thank you.

Have you tried to put them into the carrier without actually taking them to the vet? Drop some treats in there, let them explore it at their own pace, close it for a minute or two, and then either reward or praise them after release? Keep progressing to the point that treats are no longer required to lure them and they enter on their own, but still reward them on release. Rinse and repeat (and repeat and repeat and repeat). Over time they may change their attitude towards the carrier their mindset may turn into carrier = treats and praise.

If they're not food motivated you may have to use alternate bait such as toys or nip.

I often let the carriers stand outside, and they even sleep in them. i must be giving off other vibes when i take them out for the doc visit.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] meme_historian@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 9 hours ago

Inside you there are two snails...

[–] ChickenLadyLovesLife@lemmy.world 24 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

Fun fact: the guy who first proposed this "running man" hypothesis about persistence hunting in the late 1960s (Grover Krantz) was better known as a staunch advocate for the existence of Bigfoot. Personally, I can't believe that anybody could still believe in Bigfoot - it's so obviously just a Yeti in a gorilla suit.

For some weird reason, Krantz's skeleton and that of his favorite dog are on display at the Smithsonian.

[–] jnod4@lemmy.ca 5 points 10 hours ago (3 children)

The father of modern day physics changed course and started studying alchemy, chronology, biblical interpretation, losing himself to mysticism. He'd probably research big foot if he was alive as well. That doesn't mean I'm going to dismiss his real magnum opus

[–] squaresinger@lemmy.world 9 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago) (2 children)

Contrary to modern-day physics, the "persistence hunting" thing is very much not a scientific consensus. It's more of a fringe idea supported by hardly any science that somehow made it into popular science.

There's about as much credible evidence to that theory as there is to the theory that eating chocolate helps with losing weight.

[–] ChickenLadyLovesLife@lemmy.world 5 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago) (1 children)

Wikipedia politely labels persistence hunting as "conjecture". It's interesting that pretty much everything important from our ancestral past (e.g. fire-making, flint-napping tools, spears, skins and furs etc.) can be and regularly is reproduced by modern people. But somehow you never see modern people jogging down deer and killing them - even with the benefits of modern footwear, portable water containers, a carbohydrate-rich diet for energy, and GPS trackers.

somehow made it into popular science

The "somehow" as far as I can tell is the David Attenborough documentary bit that supposedly shows a Khoi-San hunter doing it. Richard Lee and a team of Harvard anthropologists extensively studied the !Kung (a Khoi-San people) during the '60s and '70s and there was never a mention in any of the literature this produced about these people engaging in persistence hunting. What they did describe was the practice of hunting with poisoned spears and arrows and then tracking the wounded, poisoned animal for days until it dropped and could be butchered. Needless to say, this is not persistence hunting.

The popular anthropologist Marvin Harris also featured Krantz' work is his final book Our Kind (which is where I first heard of it), but I don't think enough people read that book for it to have been the source of the idea's current popularity.

[–] MrPoopyButthole@lemmy.world 3 points 2 hours ago

Thank you chicken lady. That makes much more sense.

[–] HugeNerd@lemmy.ca 1 points 8 hours ago
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] curiousaur@reddthat.com 61 points 14 hours ago

I was playing tag with my kid yesterday. He's 3, almost 4. He's very fast for his age, but not as fast as me. He asked to play tag because he just learned it in school. I could dodge to the side as he was getting close and change direction. I could fake him out. I could sprint to the other side of our 1 acre meadow to creat space. But he just kept coming. Smiling and laughing the whole time. I'm starting to get winded. Hands on my knees for a second after a sprint, but only for a second as he's closed the gap already. His undeterred motivation and pace was scary. He was going to get me eventually, and he seemed to know it.

I now know how the victims of Chucky must have felt.

load more comments
view more: next ›