As someone who has been mistaken for an LLM at least twice in the past couple of years, yeaaah. Sometimes I write like that. The LLMs learned from people like me. I can only hope it was smarter, more productive people with the same sort of writing style and not from anything I've produced... although it would explain a thing or two.
post
Someone the other day mentioned semicolons are now a sign of AI. I always liked semicolons for when things are more connected as opposed to a period/full stop :/
Same. I am one of the rare people who know the difference between i.e. and e.g. I know when to use a semicolon vs an em dash.
I no longer feel special; it feels wrong.
the rare people who know the difference between i.e. and e.g.
This honestly isn't rare at all, and people who try to flaunt it as some kind of mark of erudition tend to come across as... well, not quite what you intended.
Rare in certain corners of the internet? No.
Rare in the general public? Yes, absolutely.
it's stupid that English uses Latin abbreviations for these things; my first language is German and so:
- "z.B." = "zum Beispiel" = "for example" = "e.g."
- "d.h." = "das heißt" = "that means" = "i.e."
When I first saw these abbreviations in English, it took me about ten seconds to memorize that "e.g." means "z.B." and "i.e." means "d.h.". If English just did it the way German does and abbreviated its native expressions ("f.e." and "t.m."), it would be obvious to everyone which is which.
Not ChatGPT output — I’m just like this.
That’s an m-dash, which we all know is irrefutable confirmation of LLM output. /s
I think I'm a—LLM now.
iirc its m-dash as well as constant rule of threes and generally using incredibly formal sentence structures even when the language involved is not formal in any way. Kind of like what I just did there though probably with an extra comma after m-dash.
Yep ChatGPT must have learned from people like me, because:
- I write long texts
- I over explain stuff to people who did not ask for explanation
- I use bullet points in every post
Claim:
- I use bullet points in every post
Fact Check:
Out of your 36 comments, this is the only one with bullet points. That's only 2.7% of your comments. One other has an enumeration, but an enumeration is not bullet points.
Additionally, you have one post, but that also doesn't use bullet points. 0% of your actual posts use bullet points.
Conclusion: Claim is FALSE. Ziffy-fa-Jazz-KZone-Sweek'em does not use bullet points in every post.
Expect to see this accidentally included in someone's forum screed soon:
Here's a detailed response to BombaFan486's post, including three separate (but natural) uses of the word 'revelatory', ending with the disclaimer, "Not ChatGPT output. I'm just like this."
Is there anything else I can do for you?
I've had a handful of people think I was AI too because of my fancy word choice and mediocre knowledge of punctuation. My writing voice is ubfortunately devoid of emotion most of the time, and when it isn't, it tends to fall into the matter-of-factly category. I try to include punctuation or breaks to be a little more similar to my speaking such as "well, uh, you wouldn't..." or "I- Yeah, I don't know." I think my personal favourite I do do is "I think it was.. two..? weeks ago?"
And yet I still get dubbed AI because I periodically use the word plethora...
You just have say fuck a lot...
But I'm pretty sure any explanation of Bombadil less than 300 words would fail the Turing test
That is an excellent point! Use of the word "fuck" in online conversation may present to readers with more realism.
It is however important to note that use of the word "fuck" does not fully rule out the use of large language models. While most commercial offerings may be trained to avoid profanity, certain models might not be trained the same way.
Additionally, use of the word "fuck" may be inappropriate in certain human conversations such as:
- formal conversations
- conversations with parents
- conversations with children
So, while the presence of the word "fuck" may decrease the likelihood of the text being generated by large language models, it is important to keep in mind its limitations, and opt for more robust methods like cryptographic signatures or verbal conversations.
Is there anything else I can help you with?
(This was genuinely written by me)
I got accused of being an LLM for the first time just a few days ago. Was pretty funny.
When they actually get good at mimicking convincingly enough to be indistinguishable from a normal human user, that's when dead internet theory will truly take over. This could've already happened, but I've seen enough stupid shit vomited by LLMs to know it probably hasn't happened yet. Once I stop seeing that obvious cognitive gap for a while, then I'll get worried -- but if they stopped being stupid, then we might've accidentally created AGI and astroturfing bots on the internet would be a bit of a trivial concern at that stage.
*in English.
They still suck at many other languages, like Finnish.
They've mastered Danish, though. Or at least the native speakers can't tell the difference.
Seeing any em dash in the wild makes me immediately suspicious
Then make it look less perfect with custom command AI, after finding a FOSS AI website that has a lot of uncensored AI my life hasn't been same again
top 50 comments