Clinton passed the Brady bill and an AW ban so let's not pretend that didn't happen but yeah, Repubs do wtf they want and the NRA bootlickers keep licking boots.

And don't even think about screwing something on the end of the barrel to make it less damaging to your hearing, that is gangster shit that needs heavy regulation

Unlike the rest of the rifle. Which is perfectly safe.

Trump literally said last time he was President take the guns first, due process second. maga crowd still gargling.

Historically, this is why police come after you while you're in a car, at work, or otherwise out and about. I'm curious whether, if it ever came to that point, a court would approve seizure* of any records at gun ranges or otherwise to gather data on people who might have guns (being very specific with that 'might have' wording), and then issue warrants to seize said people on the street, and then issue search warrants for the home. It would be a pretty wild reversal of evidence and probable cause. The politicians and cops would try to sell it to the maga fools as being the only way to keep cops safe from antifa terrorists, and I'd bet they would buy it.

That (judges signing off on such wild bullshit) would be so far into fascist territory that we might as well be at the bottom of fascism lake.

*This would probably be a grand jury subpoena, which both has lower evidence needs and relies on the reasoning that your transactions/records with a business are not as private as other areas of your life. Cops give these to DAs all the time to gather evidence on a case without the need to go to a judge, so blaming the courts here might be too hasty.