this post was submitted on 25 Nov 2025
392 points (95.2% liked)

Explain Like I'm Five

19027 readers
377 users here now

Simplifying Complexity, One Answer at a Time!

Rules

  1. Be respectful and inclusive.
  2. No harassment, hate speech, or trolling.
  3. Engage in constructive discussions.
  4. Share relevant content.
  5. Follow guidelines and moderators' instructions.
  6. Use appropriate language and tone.
  7. Report violations.
  8. Foster a continuous learning environment.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Bytemeister@lemmy.world 15 points 1 hour ago

The hate against socialism is the idea that someone who doesn't work as hard as you, gets the same benefits as you, and that's not fair.

Something like that could never work under capitalism. Everybody knows that rich people work extremely hard to be rich. I work hard, and I'll be rich some day too.

[–] PugJesus@piefed.social 8 points 1 hour ago

Those who are educated on the matter and oppose socialism do so because of a belief that continuing high-intensity development of the economy is preferable, for one reason or another.

Many of us would argue that, with the economy in developed countries at the point where everyone could very easily be guaranteed a good quality of life without further improvements, and that, in fact, further improvements at this point are more likely to come from the cultural and technological development enabled by a more equal and less labor-intensive society, capitalism has overstayed its welcome.

[–] Blackmist@feddit.uk 1 points 19 minutes ago

What you have to remember is that socialism means everyone paying their fair share, and some people don't want to do that.

[–] Victoriathecompact@sh.itjust.works 1 points 27 minutes ago

here in the us we opperate like a socialist country pretending to be capitalist. "Distributing things evenly" is hard when no one agrees what evenly is

[–] El_guapazo@lemmy.world 1 points 41 minutes ago

It's the PR and marketing campaigns. Capitalism concentrated the wealth with the bosses so they can send a coherent message. A message people can buy into.

Socialism marketing makes it sound like a MLM scheme. The lack of centralization puts different unions against each other.

[–] plyth@feddit.org 1 points 48 minutes ago

How can a person who resolves their conflicts with hate feel comfortable about socialism if socialism creates a space without hate? Some people want to fight and can only fight. Removing fights removes their ability to gain status and respect.

[–] IronBird@lemmy.world 8 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

decades of red scare propaganda and purposefully sabotaging public education

[–] PugJesus@piefed.social 2 points 1 hour ago

"Socialism is when the government does stuff 😭" - Average American, unfortunately

[–] kandoh@reddthat.com 5 points 2 hours ago

If everyone does better, then you're doing worse by comparison.

I want 10% unemployment and 0% interest rates. That's the magic formula where I can sexually harass my au pair and she has no choice but to put up with it.

[–] mechoman444@lemmy.world 0 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

A lot of people mix up “socialism” with “people being good neighbors.” That’s not actually what the term means. Socialism is specifically about who owns the big stuff, the means of production. In a socialist setup, people still work jobs, they still get paid, and daily life still involves employment and compensation. The difference is that major industries aren’t privately owned by large corporations. They’re controlled collectively by the public or by the workers themselves.

Small private businesses can still exist; they’re not eliminated outright. What changes is the ownership of large-scale systems: energy, manufacturing, transportation, resources, things on that level. These are shifted away from private corporate control and toward collective control.

The fundamental issue of socialism and why it doesn't and has not worked historically is because of human nature. A corporateocracy or a capitalist based society aligns much better to human nature than socialism does which is why it's significantly more "successful".

[–] PugJesus@piefed.social 3 points 1 hour ago

The fundamental issue of socialism and why it doesn’t and has not worked historically is because of human nature. A corporateocracy or a capitalist based society aligns much better to human nature than socialism does which is why it’s significantly more “successful”.

Except the only major sovereign socialist experiments have been either crushed by non-economic forces, or been Soviet-style totalitarianism.

The idea that capitalism is more based on 'human nature' ignores why capitalism actually works. You could argue, with much more validity, I would say, that feudalism is more in-tune with human nature than capitalism, yet almost no one disputes that feudalism is worse than capitalism.

[–] boonhet@sopuli.xyz 23 points 8 hours ago

The ultra rich have successfully convinced a lot of people that they, too, could become ultra rich some day - but there's no place for ultra rich under socialism.

Then further, a lot of people have been convinced that only the very very poor would be better off and everyone else would be worse off. That is of course also untrue.

[–] KeenFlame@feddit.nu 21 points 12 hours ago (8 children)

It is due to lobbying and astroturfing.

Simple as.

It's definitely not based in data, because that overwhelmingly shows massive economic and happiness growth happens in these states

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] YeahIgotskills2@lemmy.world 17 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago) (2 children)

To me the hate is quite simple to understand. Socialism means that the extremely rich will be worse off financially. The 1% have an unnatural love for money, and the idea of being less wealthy for the greater good is totally abhorrent to them.

For generations they've been able to demonise socialism using their disproportionate influence through the media, to the extent that the majority of the population now fear it.

We've really not moved on that far intellectually from the witch trials. People are collectively ignorant and fearful, and with the right nudges are easy to control to the point where they'll literally vote against their own good. They are the proverbial Turkeys voting for Christmas and I honestly don't know how we will ever get past it.

[–] bss03@infosec.pub 1 points 2 hours ago

We’ve really not moved on that far intellectually from the witch trials.

Cognitive biases seem to be unavoidable. Even if you are well-educated about a particular bias, it often takes reflection (internally or externally motivated) to recognize it in your decisions / behavior.

Fallacious reasoning is often just as good at convincing an audience, which is one of the reasons they are still in use despite many or most being documented and named in ancient times.

Individual training in critical thinking skills can help, but theocrats (in specific) and authoritarians (in general) spend a lot of effort making sure that public education is robbed of that. But, that's not enough to "intellectually move on"; even with that training, bias occurs. So, we have to build systems for bias detection and remediation if we want a just global society.

[–] NikkiDimes@lemmy.world 5 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago) (1 children)

Thankfully, we're now reaching a turning point where PragerU will be used to teach directly in schools, letting kids know why socialism is bad and capitalism is good. Wait, that's the opposite of what we want, fuck!

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›