Casting support is still available on older Chromecast devices or TVs that support Google Cast natively, according to Netflix’s support page

top 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 129 points 11 months ago (31 children)

my favourite netflix client is jellyfin tbh. it fixes all of netflix's probems.

  • source
  • hideshow 31 child comments
  • [–] 24 points 11 months ago (22 children)

    Does anyone know if it's possible to run a self-hosted Jellyfin server without having to run an entire data center on your house? I could do something simple like a NUC or equivalent and a tiny NAS, anything else?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 22 child comments
  • [–] 28 points 11 months ago

    There's people running old raspberry pis with USB hard drives.

    It'll run on just about anything.

    Though, you'll only be able to stream original quality, no on the fly quality changes for low speed connections and such.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 15 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 child)

    NUCs (specifically Intel 8th?-gen or later) are pretty much ideal for serving Jellyfin because the Intel integrated graphics can do video transcoding and the software is actually not very demanding otherwise, so the low-power CPUs are fine.

    If you were buying hardware specifically for Jellyfin (i.e. didn't want to cobble together something used), I'd suggest an N100 or N150-based NAS mini-PC like this: https://www.bee-link.com/products/beelink-me-mini-n150

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • [–] 11 points 11 months ago

    I have my jellyfin running on ubuntu server on a 12 year old PC with a bunch of salvaged HDDs added in, plugged into my standard home internet. I have like 10 people I share it with. So far it's not made a noticeable dent in either the internet usage or the electric.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (18 replies)
  • load more comments (8 replies)
    [–] 103 points 11 months ago (8 children)

    When is the next VC driven company that focuses more on growth than profit coming? I feel Netflix and all the other streaming services are ripe to be overtaken in the same way Netflix overtook tv channel packaging.

  • source
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 53 points 11 months ago (1 child)

    To streaming?

    Never.

    Streaming is a finite market that is already covered. The moment old money (aka existing media companies) jumped on it, it was done for.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 12 points 11 months ago (3 children)

    the next VC driven company…

    With you so far

    that focuses more on growth than profit

    Ah - there’s your problem. VC companies simply don’t do that.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 20 points 11 months ago

    Ah - there’s your problem. VC companies simply don’t do that.

    They most certainly do and then either cash in by selling to the next more risk adverse VC or sells it at a loss if they believe the company failed to disrupt the market.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 16 points 11 months ago

    Ah - there’s your problem. VC companies simply don’t do that.

    That is exactly what VC companies do. That's why they need the VC money. First you conquer the market at a loss. Only when users have no other options to escape to, you start squeezing them.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 79 points 11 months ago* (3 children)

    Changes like this are always made to "Enhance the user experience" yet the UX only goes backwards

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 16 points 11 months ago (1 child)

    They're made to “Enhance the user experience profit”

    “Enhance the user experience” is just what the dev or documentation team writes when management dictates that they drop a feature. The only reasons they would have dropped it:

    • Dev work vs actual customer usage (e.g. it wasn't getting a lot of users but devs had to maintain it with each update)
    • People were using it to intercept the stream and capture movies to pirate.

    Every decision is about increasing profits first, and UX almost always takes a back seat to that

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • [–] 63 points 11 months ago (6 children)

    Just go Piracy. Real-Debrid + Stremio, Torrent + Hayase or anything else that’s with Piracy.

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • load more comments (5 replies)
    [–] 55 points 11 months ago (8 children)

    Lol why?

    Genuinely seems pretty arbitrary given you need to use their app to start the cast anyway

  • source
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 41 points 11 months ago* (2 children)

    Because fuck you, that’s why. I’m sure they will re-introduce the feature behind a paywall soon.

    ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

    Once you tell a company that you are willing to pay for something more than once, prepare to get fucked, because that’s all you’re gonna get. And not the fun kind.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 11 months ago (1 child)

    Casting support is still available on older Chromecast devices or TVs that support Google Cast natively, according to Netflix’s support page, but only for subscribers on pricier ad-free plans, which start from $17.99 per month. Netflix users with an ad-supported subscription ($7.99 per month) will be unable to cast from their phones even if they own legacy Chromecast devices.

    Paywall already there. Excerpt taken from the linked article.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • load more comments (4 replies)
    [–] 41 points 11 months ago (1 child)

    Thou shalt buy a smart tv or other device that we can pull metrics from and force advertising to.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 15 points 11 months ago*

    And require to login too

    Make no mistake, this was intentional before the holidays so families visiting relatives can't just cast Netflix from their phone to watch something and will require someone to login and use it one of their authorized devices...or coerce them to upgrade if they already have too many authorized devices

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 34 points 11 months ago (14 children)

    Use Jellyfin. Fill your server with treasures procured from the high seas. Watch on any device. Sync play with far away friends or family.

  • source
  • hideshow 14 child comments
  • load more comments (14 replies)
    [–] 34 points 11 months ago (5 children)

    The kind of people they're pissing off with this, are the same people most likely to switch to bittorrent.

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • load more comments (5 replies)
    [–] 33 points 11 months ago

    As if I needed another reason to never get netflix again. 🏴‍☠️🏴‍☠️🏴‍☠️

  • source
  • [–] 30 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

    The only good thing about Netflix is their diverse global library.

    As in, a Netflix subscription plus a VPN, gives you access to a large library of global content.

    Taking that into account, it's probably still the best streaming service, which means they're the shiniest turd in the toilet.

    But still, Jellyfin FTW.

  • source
  • [–] 25 points 11 months ago

    enshittification

  • source
  • [–] 23 points 11 months ago (4 children)

    What possible benefit does this offer to Netflix? Are they trying to avoid paying licensing fee or something?

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • load more comments (4 replies)
    [–] 22 points 11 months ago

    1936: any universal turing machine can mimic another

    2025: unfortunately your turing machine has a shape we don't like so we will block you from using it productively despite the fact that it has the exact same hardware inside that other machines

  • source
  • [–] 22 points 11 months ago (1 child)

    The best part is how in the end-stages of capitalism, everything keeps getting worse for consumers. While prices go up, even. It's awesome. /s

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 18 points 11 months ago (9 children)

    Yeah... There goes my subscription. I'm casting everything to Chromecast on my older TV.

  • source
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • load more comments (5 replies)
    [–] 14 points 11 months ago (2 children)

    As a Chromecast user, it seems like Google is trying to kill this feature anyway.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
    [–] 13 points 11 months ago (46 children)

    Hmmm… still works fine from the Plex app

  • source
  • hideshow 46 child comments
  • load more comments (46 replies)
    [–] 13 points 11 months ago (3 children)

    Between their new interface and this, it’s like they are actively trying to get you to use it less.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 11 months ago

    Awesome. Another reason to never give them money again. 👍

  • source
  • load more comments
    view more: next ›