this post was submitted on 21 May 2025
297 points (96.8% liked)

Technology

70249 readers
3872 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Absolutely needed: to get high efficiency for this beast ... as it gets better, we'll become too dependent.

"all of this growth is for a new technology that’s still finding its footing, and in many applications—education, medical advice, legal analysis—might be the wrong tool for the job,,,"

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] drmoose@lemmy.world 24 points 1 day ago (4 children)

The energy issue almost feels like a red herring for distracting all idiots from actual AI problems and lemmy is just gobbling it up every day. It's so tiring.

[–] CapriciousDay@lemmy.ml 5 points 18 hours ago

The international energy agency estimates that the total electricity consumption for AI worldwide was around 415 TWh per year as of 2024. That's more than the UK uses.

[–] phoenixz@lemmy.ca 46 points 1 day ago (11 children)

That's because it IS an issue, together with many other issues like disinformation, over reliance, wrong tools for wrong (most) jobs, etc.

load more comments (11 replies)
[–] Quibblekrust@thelemmy.club 7 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

lemmy is just gobbling it up every day. It's so tiring.

Are you fucking serious? All I ever see on Lemmy is prople saying "AI slop" over and over and over and over again... in like every comment section of every post. It could be a picture that was actually hand-drawn, or a photograph that was definitely not AI, or articles written by someone "sounding like AI". The AI hate on Lemmy is WAY overpowering any support.

[–] drmoose@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I think you misunderstood me here as we're in agreement already

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] TootSweet@lemmy.world 76 points 2 days ago (3 children)

as it gets better

Bold assumption.

[–] WanderingThoughts 31 points 2 days ago (32 children)

Historically AI always got much better. Usually after the field collapsed in an AI winter and several years went by in search for a new technique to then repeat the hype cycle. Tech bros want it to get better without that winter stage though.

[–] ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world 1 points 2 hours ago

That's part of why they installed Donald Trump as the dictator of the United States. The other is the network states.

[–] Jesus_666@lemmy.world 28 points 2 days ago (6 children)

AI usually got better when people realized it wasn't going to do all it was hyped up for but was useful for a certain set of tasks.

Then it turned from world-changing hotness to super boring tech your washing machine uses to fine-tune its washing program.

[–] WanderingThoughts 29 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Like the cliché goes: when it works, we don't call it AI anymore.

[–] technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The smart move is never calling it "AI" in the first place.

[–] Enkers@sh.itjust.works 8 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Unless you're in comp sci, and AI is a field, not a marketing term. And in that case everyone already knows that's not "it".

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (30 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›