this post was submitted on 20 Jan 2026
110 points (100.0% liked)

World News

1969 readers
105 users here now

Rules:
Be a decent person.
No racism, sexism, ableism, homophobia, transphobia, zionism/nazism, and so on.

Other Great Communities:

Rules

Be excellent to each other

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 34 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Mastengwe@sh.itjust.works 26 points 2 months ago (4 children)

As much as I truly believe that TikTok fucking sucks, so much that I have everything TikTok related blocked from my web browser, suing because your kids are morons is pretty fucking dumb.

[–] warbond@lemmy.world 23 points 2 months ago (4 children)

No empathy for grieving parents? Maybe I'm just getting old.

[–] damnedfurry@lemmy.world 18 points 2 months ago (2 children)

You can have empathy while simultaneously realizing they obviously have no case.

The article quotes an attorney representing the families saying that the videos were "material they can’t turn away from". Come on, now. Those kids weren't Clockwork Orange'd. Let's return to reality.

[–] lath@piefed.social 17 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Objectively speaking, young and impressionable minds are more susceptible to falling for dark patterns.

[–] damnedfurry@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago

All the more reason for parents to be actively involved with their children, especially at those ages.

[–] Sinaf@lemmy.world 12 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

It doesn't cost you anything to refrain from using the word "morons" in this context... But I guess that's just the empathy.

[–] damnedfurry@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

It doesn’t cost you anything to refrain from using the word “morons”

That's why I didn't use it.

That was "Mastengwe". Pay attention to who you're replying to next time.

That goes for all of the people who upvoted your comment, too. Shameful.

[–] Sinaf@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago

I should have put it differently, but "you" was meant in a general way.

[–] AntiBullyRanger@ani.social 8 points 2 months ago (2 children)

What kind of parents leave their children unsupervised on the internet?

[–] somethingsnappy@lemmy.world 14 points 2 months ago (2 children)

/s? Or you don't have kids?

[–] atomicbocks@sh.itjust.works 6 points 2 months ago (2 children)

There is zero part of growing up that requires access to the internet.

[–] somethingsnappy@lemmy.world 16 points 2 months ago (3 children)

I agree, but unless you don't let kids have friends, they will have access.

[–] some_kind_of_guy@lemmy.world 4 points 2 months ago (1 children)

my parents tried many times to revoke my access.

The typical workarounds involved a trip to the dump to dig up some godforsaken machine, and maybe stopping by the library to burn an iso. Wireless adapter lacks an antenna? No problem, I'll rig up a coat hanger/paperclip/random piece of wire.

[–] AntiBullyRanger@ani.social 3 points 2 months ago (1 children)

At that point, why do I need to be worried you won't do a suicide challenge?

[–] some_kind_of_guy@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)
[–] AntiBullyRanger@ani.social 2 points 2 months ago

Follow your logic. If my guardianship tactics to cease you from doing choking challenges persist, am I to blame for your continued workarounds?

[–] AntiBullyRanger@ani.social 2 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

I love more so your implications that atomicbocks even has the privilege of getting them an internet accessible router.

[–] atomicbocks@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 months ago

Don’t let your kids hang out with those who have parents you don’t know and don’t trust. It has worked for Christian parents for decades and it worked for my lesbian parents growing up in the conservative south.

[–] lath@piefed.social 5 points 2 months ago

That's old news. Always online is slowly being pushed even by governments because it's easier to track citizens that way.

[–] AntiBullyRanger@ani.social 1 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

scroll up🔼1🧵. I adopted an adult in my polycule.
Want to adopt more. I am responsible enough to supervise their internet usage, and they know to ask me permission to record themselves online with masks & filters.

[–] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 1 points 2 months ago

Your parents need to get out of that retirement home and take away your Internet

[–] SourGumGum@lemmy.world 5 points 2 months ago (1 children)

What kind of helicopter parents snoop on their children?

[–] AntiBullyRanger@ani.social 4 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

You call guardianship “snooping”?
Did you lose your guardian’s trust or something?

[–] eskimofry@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago

no empathy for not being good parents. Now they are no longer parents.

[–] Mastengwe@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 months ago

Nope. Stupid is as stupid does. This is Darwinism at work.

[–] lath@piefed.social 9 points 2 months ago

Yup, they should just bury their kids and move on. That's the really smart move.

[–] Rothe@piefed.social 7 points 2 months ago (1 children)

What a bootlicking psychopathic comment.

[–] Mastengwe@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 months ago

What a childish response to something you disagree with.

[–] AntiBullyRanger@ani.social 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Both are at fault in this case. This is why I supervise my adoptees. I care too much about them than to let them pull dangerous stunts like these.

Tiktok should have also immediately sent law enforcement on the folks that started the challenge. Algorithms are algorithms, but even some trends are against their ToS.

and yet they take action too slow

[–] workerONE@lemmy.world 12 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

After being choked unconscious there is about 7 seconds before brain damage will start to occur.

[–] tomcatt360@lemmy.zip 3 points 2 months ago

Ah, my unfun fact of the day

[–] gladflag@lemmy.ml 9 points 2 months ago

Lawyers for TikTok argued that the case should be dismissed under the First Amendment and the current law called the Communications Decency Act, which bars internet companies from liability for content by third parties.

Critics argue that the law is outdated.

Ya reckon?!

[–] mehrshad@piefed.social 4 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Did we just skip the “Run blindfolded into oncoming traffic TikTok challenge” between tide pods and choking, or have I not been paying enough attention?

Section 230 needs a paddlin’ now that it’s clear big tech controls every platform and every corner, and Trust and Safety is nothing more than a weak tea after-the-fact press release slash out-of-court settlement promising “changes”.