this post was submitted on 01 Apr 2025
112 points (98.3% liked)

politics

22573 readers
4765 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
all 11 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ilinamorato@lemmy.world 35 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Oligarchs be runnin scared

[–] grumpusbumpus@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Nah, if they were running, they wouldn't be making a violent example out of Saint Luigi. They're trying to cow the peasants but showing what happens if you try to stand up to them. I hope they fail, and I hope the optics of this completely backfire.

[–] ilinamorato@lemmy.world 2 points 1 hour ago

They're trying to make a violent example of him because they're running scared. They're terrified of copycats. They think that projecting an image of fearless anger will distract from the fact that they're always looking over their shoulders.

[–] chuckleslord@lemmy.world 27 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Lol, implying he's found guilty. Lmao even

[–] ilinamorato@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

~~Well, he entered a guilty plea, so that part is fairly open-and-shut.~~ Of course jury nullification isn't out of the question, but really this case is most likely to come down to a question of sentencing.

Edit: He didn't plead guilty.

[–] chuckleslord@lemmy.world 19 points 1 day ago (1 children)

No, he hasn't. What is your source? I see "not guilty"on state charges and no plea yet on federal ones.

[–] ilinamorato@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

Whoops, my apologies. I got it from this article, but only because I read too quickly and didn't catch the "not."

[–] pimento64@sopuli.xyz 19 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Are they trying to look scared shitless to undermine the whole farce, or do they actively want to create a martyr? Those are the only two options that don't require a room temperature IQ.

I don't see "IQ" on the NASDAQ

[–] BrianTheeBiscuiteer@lemmy.world 1 points 19 hours ago

Is this meant to be a deterrent? A regular guys life for a billionaires life?

Ha! Hahaha HAHAHA HAAHAHA! 😂

We're coming out waaaaaaay ahead on this one.