Charge him with planning a terrorist act then, if that's what he was doing.

I think he should be punished for the speech but I don't think the punishment fits the crime.

Why? What’s happening? I never hear anything from over there.

considering australia has neo-nazis that went to US, murdoch, and nick adams.

He cant, he won't be allowed in with a criminal conviction :)

It's wild that pro-Palestine/anti-israel protestors are being lumped in with neo Nazis. Particularly when Israelis and neo Nazis have so many common opinions ..

Context is really important.

I agree that the QLD legislation is scary - it's bullshit that their legislation is going to "proscribe" that specific phrase, so if one utters it then that's an offense regardless of intent or context.

Bingo. Once you start policing words it’s a slippery slope to full on government authoritarian control.

I heard a rally organiser on the steps of the Melbourne State Library yell From the River to the Sea and people in the crowd yell back, Kill Them. This was on October 8th 2023.

Other instances where freedom of speech does not apply is planning a crime, making plans for a bank robbery is just words, right?

Tolerance is only paradoxical when you go out of your way to not view it as a social contact.

When tolerance is the social contact, then everyone is protected by it except those who go out of their way to not be protected by it.

That concept is, pardon my French, complete bullshit.

Remember - you’re being intolerant of people who hold views you don’t like. Think what these laws mean when, not if, people with opposing views to you get in power.