▲ 758 ▼ Centre Party (europe.pub) submitted 4 days ago* by inari@piefed.zip to c/wikipedia@lemmy.world 144 comments fedilink hide all child comments https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Centre_Party_%28Netherlands%29
[–] bufalo1973@piefed.social 197 points 4 days ago (30 children) "I'm neither right not left" = far-right. Always. permalink fedilink source hideshow 30 child comments replies: [–] inari@piefed.zip [S] 70 points 4 days ago (22 children) Yep, it's called Fish Hook Theory: permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 22 child comments replies: [–] dreamkeeper@lemmy.world 8 points 2 days ago Nah it's not that complicated. Nazis are just lying manipulative fucks. That's their main thing. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Gladaed@feddit.org 87 points 4 days ago (17 children) Note that there is no such theory outside of Internet slang. There is no merit in it. Just as horseshoe theory is without merit. There are complex, underlying causes for it making so much sense, but do not be baited by comfort. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 17 child comments replies: [–] cowfodder@lemmy.zip 24 points 4 days ago (13 children) The only part of horseshoe theory that tracks is that if you go far enough left you get your guns back. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 13 child comments replies: [–] Gladaed@feddit.org 30 points 4 days ago (12 children) The part that tracks is that authoritarians exist orthogonal to left/right. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 12 child comments replies: [–] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 5 points 3 days ago (5 children) And that those unwilling to compromise on anything with anyone tend to get authoritarians permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] inari@piefed.zip [S] 2 points 3 days ago (4 children) Funny, it's usually the centrists who partner with and allow authoritarians into power permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] mrbutterscotch@feddit.org 2 points 3 days ago (3 children) In a german state election the BSW, a left wing splinter party, just just gave their support to the afd, an extreme right-wing party, getting fascists in to power within germany for the first time since WW2. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] kettuli@lemmy.world 4 points 3 days ago (2 children) Oh, the party of the Kreml-bankrolled ”leftist” backed up the far-right party. Oh my. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] mrbutterscotch@feddit.org 2 points 3 days ago The point being they splintered from a true leftist party and were not from the centre. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Gladaed@feddit.org 2 points 3 days ago Moving the goal post. They arose from the SED. They are of leftist origin. permalink fedilink source parent [–] BanMeFromPosting@lemmy.ml -3 points 3 days ago (5 children) "authoritarianism" is a concept made up by an anti-semetic CIA stooge in order to be able to equivocate between Nazis and communists. Its a completely meaningless term where every definition is either so broad that it describes all states (and almost just all social structures organised for any purpose) or so narrow it is just a synonym for whatever designated enemy you are being told is evil. It's about as cogent as "badguyism". permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] martti@suppo.fi 1 point 2 days ago (1 child) Tankie tears is music for my ears permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] BanMeFromPosting@lemmy.ml 1 point 2 days ago ? permalink fedilink source parent [–] LongLive@lemmy.world 2 points 3 days ago (2 children) links please, this is certainly unfamiliar permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] BanMeFromPosting@lemmy.ml 0 points 3 days ago Sure, what would you like links for? The stuff about Hannah Arendt or the critique of the theory of "authoritarianism"? The first I can provide, but let me know more specifically what so I dont overwhelm. The latter I cannot since the link is just Hannah Arendt and successors works'. I'd encourage you to actually read it with a critical eye and notice how vague it is. It is a theory that only cares about whether a state does stuff, not why or how or for whom or with what support. This is completely silly. Every state is authoritarian, every hierarchical organisation is authoritarian. Its a word used to make you think negatively of a group - Like how enemy states do not have governments, they have regimes and their VPs aren't VPs they're "hand picked successors". What I would really recommend is that you read "Blackshirts and Reds", "Inventing Reality" and Engels' "On Authority" permalink fedilink source parent [–] Gladaed@feddit.org 0 points 3 days ago Stalinism.ml permalink fedilink source parent [–] yucandu@lemmy.world 2 points 4 days ago (2 children) "Horseshoe theory" is the idea that I don't really care if I'm being killed by Hitler or Mao if I'm being killed. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] explodicle@sh.itjust.works 7 points 3 days ago Death by centrist is impersonal. It's your fault for not hustling hard enough for AC. permalink fedilink source parent [–] BanMeFromPosting@lemmy.ml 2 points 3 days ago I personally care a lot more about what the state suppresses, how it does it, for whom it does it, against whom it does it, why it does it, with how much public support it does it and what the effect of it is, rather than some simplistic black-and-white view that merely cares about whether a state does things or not. permalink fedilink source parent [–] bufalo1973@piefed.social 13 points 4 days ago* (2 children) The main difference between "neither left nor right" and far-right is hypocrisy. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 8 points 4 days ago* (1 child) Or sometimes denial permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Tiger@sh.itjust.works 5 points 4 days ago Don’t forget idiocy. permalink fedilink source parent [–] cabbage@piefed.social 22 points 4 days ago Some green parties tried the same nonsense for a while, though I think they all admit to being left by now. The argument was that they'd work independently of party blocks with climate as the only issue. Of course right wing politics are always an environmental disaster, but sometimes you would see unusual constellations in local politics. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 5 points 3 days ago* also notice the confusing "centre party" means they are "both sides", its to trick would be voters into voting for them who dont care enough to read past thier party name. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Airfried@piefed.social 6 points 3 days ago Reminder that the Nazis literally called themselves National Socialists. They were the opposite of course and swiftly destroyed any trace of socialism once they were in power. That's what far-rights do. permalink fedilink source parent [–] DekSomBoon@lemmy.today 2 points 4 days ago (3 children) Wasn't fascism originally about being neither right nor left, but then it got sort of absorbed (or bought out) by the right to combat the left? Thats atleast how I've understood it, and of course there is so much more to fascism than that but thats just how i'd summarize it permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] saimen@feddit.org 10 points 4 days ago (2 children) I only know that the Nazis presented themselves as the "third way" between communism and capitalism. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] helvetpuli@sopuli.xyz 5 points 4 days ago https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ernst_R%C3%B6hm That didn't last long. permalink fedilink source parent [–] azimir@lemmy.ml 3 points 4 days ago Just like the AfD in Germany today. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] inari@piefed.zip [S] 70 points 4 days ago (22 children) Yep, it's called Fish Hook Theory: permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 22 child comments replies: [–] dreamkeeper@lemmy.world 8 points 2 days ago Nah it's not that complicated. Nazis are just lying manipulative fucks. That's their main thing. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Gladaed@feddit.org 87 points 4 days ago (17 children) Note that there is no such theory outside of Internet slang. There is no merit in it. Just as horseshoe theory is without merit. There are complex, underlying causes for it making so much sense, but do not be baited by comfort. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 17 child comments replies: [–] cowfodder@lemmy.zip 24 points 4 days ago (13 children) The only part of horseshoe theory that tracks is that if you go far enough left you get your guns back. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 13 child comments replies: [–] Gladaed@feddit.org 30 points 4 days ago (12 children) The part that tracks is that authoritarians exist orthogonal to left/right. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 12 child comments replies: [–] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 5 points 3 days ago (5 children) And that those unwilling to compromise on anything with anyone tend to get authoritarians permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] inari@piefed.zip [S] 2 points 3 days ago (4 children) Funny, it's usually the centrists who partner with and allow authoritarians into power permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] mrbutterscotch@feddit.org 2 points 3 days ago (3 children) In a german state election the BSW, a left wing splinter party, just just gave their support to the afd, an extreme right-wing party, getting fascists in to power within germany for the first time since WW2. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] kettuli@lemmy.world 4 points 3 days ago (2 children) Oh, the party of the Kreml-bankrolled ”leftist” backed up the far-right party. Oh my. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] mrbutterscotch@feddit.org 2 points 3 days ago The point being they splintered from a true leftist party and were not from the centre. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Gladaed@feddit.org 2 points 3 days ago Moving the goal post. They arose from the SED. They are of leftist origin. permalink fedilink source parent [–] BanMeFromPosting@lemmy.ml -3 points 3 days ago (5 children) "authoritarianism" is a concept made up by an anti-semetic CIA stooge in order to be able to equivocate between Nazis and communists. Its a completely meaningless term where every definition is either so broad that it describes all states (and almost just all social structures organised for any purpose) or so narrow it is just a synonym for whatever designated enemy you are being told is evil. It's about as cogent as "badguyism". permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] martti@suppo.fi 1 point 2 days ago (1 child) Tankie tears is music for my ears permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] BanMeFromPosting@lemmy.ml 1 point 2 days ago ? permalink fedilink source parent [–] LongLive@lemmy.world 2 points 3 days ago (2 children) links please, this is certainly unfamiliar permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] BanMeFromPosting@lemmy.ml 0 points 3 days ago Sure, what would you like links for? The stuff about Hannah Arendt or the critique of the theory of "authoritarianism"? The first I can provide, but let me know more specifically what so I dont overwhelm. The latter I cannot since the link is just Hannah Arendt and successors works'. I'd encourage you to actually read it with a critical eye and notice how vague it is. It is a theory that only cares about whether a state does stuff, not why or how or for whom or with what support. This is completely silly. Every state is authoritarian, every hierarchical organisation is authoritarian. Its a word used to make you think negatively of a group - Like how enemy states do not have governments, they have regimes and their VPs aren't VPs they're "hand picked successors". What I would really recommend is that you read "Blackshirts and Reds", "Inventing Reality" and Engels' "On Authority" permalink fedilink source parent [–] Gladaed@feddit.org 0 points 3 days ago Stalinism.ml permalink fedilink source parent [–] yucandu@lemmy.world 2 points 4 days ago (2 children) "Horseshoe theory" is the idea that I don't really care if I'm being killed by Hitler or Mao if I'm being killed. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] explodicle@sh.itjust.works 7 points 3 days ago Death by centrist is impersonal. It's your fault for not hustling hard enough for AC. permalink fedilink source parent [–] BanMeFromPosting@lemmy.ml 2 points 3 days ago I personally care a lot more about what the state suppresses, how it does it, for whom it does it, against whom it does it, why it does it, with how much public support it does it and what the effect of it is, rather than some simplistic black-and-white view that merely cares about whether a state does things or not. permalink fedilink source parent [–] bufalo1973@piefed.social 13 points 4 days ago* (2 children) The main difference between "neither left nor right" and far-right is hypocrisy. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 8 points 4 days ago* (1 child) Or sometimes denial permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Tiger@sh.itjust.works 5 points 4 days ago Don’t forget idiocy. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] dreamkeeper@lemmy.world 8 points 2 days ago Nah it's not that complicated. Nazis are just lying manipulative fucks. That's their main thing. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Gladaed@feddit.org 87 points 4 days ago (17 children) Note that there is no such theory outside of Internet slang. There is no merit in it. Just as horseshoe theory is without merit. There are complex, underlying causes for it making so much sense, but do not be baited by comfort. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 17 child comments replies: [–] cowfodder@lemmy.zip 24 points 4 days ago (13 children) The only part of horseshoe theory that tracks is that if you go far enough left you get your guns back. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 13 child comments replies: [–] Gladaed@feddit.org 30 points 4 days ago (12 children) The part that tracks is that authoritarians exist orthogonal to left/right. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 12 child comments replies: [–] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 5 points 3 days ago (5 children) And that those unwilling to compromise on anything with anyone tend to get authoritarians permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] inari@piefed.zip [S] 2 points 3 days ago (4 children) Funny, it's usually the centrists who partner with and allow authoritarians into power permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] mrbutterscotch@feddit.org 2 points 3 days ago (3 children) In a german state election the BSW, a left wing splinter party, just just gave their support to the afd, an extreme right-wing party, getting fascists in to power within germany for the first time since WW2. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] kettuli@lemmy.world 4 points 3 days ago (2 children) Oh, the party of the Kreml-bankrolled ”leftist” backed up the far-right party. Oh my. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] mrbutterscotch@feddit.org 2 points 3 days ago The point being they splintered from a true leftist party and were not from the centre. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Gladaed@feddit.org 2 points 3 days ago Moving the goal post. They arose from the SED. They are of leftist origin. permalink fedilink source parent [–] BanMeFromPosting@lemmy.ml -3 points 3 days ago (5 children) "authoritarianism" is a concept made up by an anti-semetic CIA stooge in order to be able to equivocate between Nazis and communists. Its a completely meaningless term where every definition is either so broad that it describes all states (and almost just all social structures organised for any purpose) or so narrow it is just a synonym for whatever designated enemy you are being told is evil. It's about as cogent as "badguyism". permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] martti@suppo.fi 1 point 2 days ago (1 child) Tankie tears is music for my ears permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] BanMeFromPosting@lemmy.ml 1 point 2 days ago ? permalink fedilink source parent [–] LongLive@lemmy.world 2 points 3 days ago (2 children) links please, this is certainly unfamiliar permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] BanMeFromPosting@lemmy.ml 0 points 3 days ago Sure, what would you like links for? The stuff about Hannah Arendt or the critique of the theory of "authoritarianism"? The first I can provide, but let me know more specifically what so I dont overwhelm. The latter I cannot since the link is just Hannah Arendt and successors works'. I'd encourage you to actually read it with a critical eye and notice how vague it is. It is a theory that only cares about whether a state does stuff, not why or how or for whom or with what support. This is completely silly. Every state is authoritarian, every hierarchical organisation is authoritarian. Its a word used to make you think negatively of a group - Like how enemy states do not have governments, they have regimes and their VPs aren't VPs they're "hand picked successors". What I would really recommend is that you read "Blackshirts and Reds", "Inventing Reality" and Engels' "On Authority" permalink fedilink source parent [–] Gladaed@feddit.org 0 points 3 days ago Stalinism.ml permalink fedilink source parent [–] yucandu@lemmy.world 2 points 4 days ago (2 children) "Horseshoe theory" is the idea that I don't really care if I'm being killed by Hitler or Mao if I'm being killed. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] explodicle@sh.itjust.works 7 points 3 days ago Death by centrist is impersonal. It's your fault for not hustling hard enough for AC. permalink fedilink source parent [–] BanMeFromPosting@lemmy.ml 2 points 3 days ago I personally care a lot more about what the state suppresses, how it does it, for whom it does it, against whom it does it, why it does it, with how much public support it does it and what the effect of it is, rather than some simplistic black-and-white view that merely cares about whether a state does things or not. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] cowfodder@lemmy.zip 24 points 4 days ago (13 children) The only part of horseshoe theory that tracks is that if you go far enough left you get your guns back. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 13 child comments replies: [–] Gladaed@feddit.org 30 points 4 days ago (12 children) The part that tracks is that authoritarians exist orthogonal to left/right. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 12 child comments replies: [–] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 5 points 3 days ago (5 children) And that those unwilling to compromise on anything with anyone tend to get authoritarians permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] inari@piefed.zip [S] 2 points 3 days ago (4 children) Funny, it's usually the centrists who partner with and allow authoritarians into power permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] mrbutterscotch@feddit.org 2 points 3 days ago (3 children) In a german state election the BSW, a left wing splinter party, just just gave their support to the afd, an extreme right-wing party, getting fascists in to power within germany for the first time since WW2. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] kettuli@lemmy.world 4 points 3 days ago (2 children) Oh, the party of the Kreml-bankrolled ”leftist” backed up the far-right party. Oh my. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] mrbutterscotch@feddit.org 2 points 3 days ago The point being they splintered from a true leftist party and were not from the centre. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Gladaed@feddit.org 2 points 3 days ago Moving the goal post. They arose from the SED. They are of leftist origin. permalink fedilink source parent [–] BanMeFromPosting@lemmy.ml -3 points 3 days ago (5 children) "authoritarianism" is a concept made up by an anti-semetic CIA stooge in order to be able to equivocate between Nazis and communists. Its a completely meaningless term where every definition is either so broad that it describes all states (and almost just all social structures organised for any purpose) or so narrow it is just a synonym for whatever designated enemy you are being told is evil. It's about as cogent as "badguyism". permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] martti@suppo.fi 1 point 2 days ago (1 child) Tankie tears is music for my ears permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] BanMeFromPosting@lemmy.ml 1 point 2 days ago ? permalink fedilink source parent [–] LongLive@lemmy.world 2 points 3 days ago (2 children) links please, this is certainly unfamiliar permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] BanMeFromPosting@lemmy.ml 0 points 3 days ago Sure, what would you like links for? The stuff about Hannah Arendt or the critique of the theory of "authoritarianism"? The first I can provide, but let me know more specifically what so I dont overwhelm. The latter I cannot since the link is just Hannah Arendt and successors works'. I'd encourage you to actually read it with a critical eye and notice how vague it is. It is a theory that only cares about whether a state does stuff, not why or how or for whom or with what support. This is completely silly. Every state is authoritarian, every hierarchical organisation is authoritarian. Its a word used to make you think negatively of a group - Like how enemy states do not have governments, they have regimes and their VPs aren't VPs they're "hand picked successors". What I would really recommend is that you read "Blackshirts and Reds", "Inventing Reality" and Engels' "On Authority" permalink fedilink source parent [–] Gladaed@feddit.org 0 points 3 days ago Stalinism.ml permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Gladaed@feddit.org 30 points 4 days ago (12 children) The part that tracks is that authoritarians exist orthogonal to left/right. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 12 child comments replies: [–] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 5 points 3 days ago (5 children) And that those unwilling to compromise on anything with anyone tend to get authoritarians permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] inari@piefed.zip [S] 2 points 3 days ago (4 children) Funny, it's usually the centrists who partner with and allow authoritarians into power permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] mrbutterscotch@feddit.org 2 points 3 days ago (3 children) In a german state election the BSW, a left wing splinter party, just just gave their support to the afd, an extreme right-wing party, getting fascists in to power within germany for the first time since WW2. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] kettuli@lemmy.world 4 points 3 days ago (2 children) Oh, the party of the Kreml-bankrolled ”leftist” backed up the far-right party. Oh my. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] mrbutterscotch@feddit.org 2 points 3 days ago The point being they splintered from a true leftist party and were not from the centre. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Gladaed@feddit.org 2 points 3 days ago Moving the goal post. They arose from the SED. They are of leftist origin. permalink fedilink source parent [–] BanMeFromPosting@lemmy.ml -3 points 3 days ago (5 children) "authoritarianism" is a concept made up by an anti-semetic CIA stooge in order to be able to equivocate between Nazis and communists. Its a completely meaningless term where every definition is either so broad that it describes all states (and almost just all social structures organised for any purpose) or so narrow it is just a synonym for whatever designated enemy you are being told is evil. It's about as cogent as "badguyism". permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] martti@suppo.fi 1 point 2 days ago (1 child) Tankie tears is music for my ears permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] BanMeFromPosting@lemmy.ml 1 point 2 days ago ? permalink fedilink source parent [–] LongLive@lemmy.world 2 points 3 days ago (2 children) links please, this is certainly unfamiliar permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] BanMeFromPosting@lemmy.ml 0 points 3 days ago Sure, what would you like links for? The stuff about Hannah Arendt or the critique of the theory of "authoritarianism"? The first I can provide, but let me know more specifically what so I dont overwhelm. The latter I cannot since the link is just Hannah Arendt and successors works'. I'd encourage you to actually read it with a critical eye and notice how vague it is. It is a theory that only cares about whether a state does stuff, not why or how or for whom or with what support. This is completely silly. Every state is authoritarian, every hierarchical organisation is authoritarian. Its a word used to make you think negatively of a group - Like how enemy states do not have governments, they have regimes and their VPs aren't VPs they're "hand picked successors". What I would really recommend is that you read "Blackshirts and Reds", "Inventing Reality" and Engels' "On Authority" permalink fedilink source parent [–] Gladaed@feddit.org 0 points 3 days ago Stalinism.ml permalink fedilink source parent
[–] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 5 points 3 days ago (5 children) And that those unwilling to compromise on anything with anyone tend to get authoritarians permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] inari@piefed.zip [S] 2 points 3 days ago (4 children) Funny, it's usually the centrists who partner with and allow authoritarians into power permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] mrbutterscotch@feddit.org 2 points 3 days ago (3 children) In a german state election the BSW, a left wing splinter party, just just gave their support to the afd, an extreme right-wing party, getting fascists in to power within germany for the first time since WW2. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] kettuli@lemmy.world 4 points 3 days ago (2 children) Oh, the party of the Kreml-bankrolled ”leftist” backed up the far-right party. Oh my. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] mrbutterscotch@feddit.org 2 points 3 days ago The point being they splintered from a true leftist party and were not from the centre. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Gladaed@feddit.org 2 points 3 days ago Moving the goal post. They arose from the SED. They are of leftist origin. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] inari@piefed.zip [S] 2 points 3 days ago (4 children) Funny, it's usually the centrists who partner with and allow authoritarians into power permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] mrbutterscotch@feddit.org 2 points 3 days ago (3 children) In a german state election the BSW, a left wing splinter party, just just gave their support to the afd, an extreme right-wing party, getting fascists in to power within germany for the first time since WW2. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] kettuli@lemmy.world 4 points 3 days ago (2 children) Oh, the party of the Kreml-bankrolled ”leftist” backed up the far-right party. Oh my. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] mrbutterscotch@feddit.org 2 points 3 days ago The point being they splintered from a true leftist party and were not from the centre. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Gladaed@feddit.org 2 points 3 days ago Moving the goal post. They arose from the SED. They are of leftist origin. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] mrbutterscotch@feddit.org 2 points 3 days ago (3 children) In a german state election the BSW, a left wing splinter party, just just gave their support to the afd, an extreme right-wing party, getting fascists in to power within germany for the first time since WW2. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] kettuli@lemmy.world 4 points 3 days ago (2 children) Oh, the party of the Kreml-bankrolled ”leftist” backed up the far-right party. Oh my. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] mrbutterscotch@feddit.org 2 points 3 days ago The point being they splintered from a true leftist party and were not from the centre. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Gladaed@feddit.org 2 points 3 days ago Moving the goal post. They arose from the SED. They are of leftist origin. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] kettuli@lemmy.world 4 points 3 days ago (2 children) Oh, the party of the Kreml-bankrolled ”leftist” backed up the far-right party. Oh my. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] mrbutterscotch@feddit.org 2 points 3 days ago The point being they splintered from a true leftist party and were not from the centre. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Gladaed@feddit.org 2 points 3 days ago Moving the goal post. They arose from the SED. They are of leftist origin. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] mrbutterscotch@feddit.org 2 points 3 days ago The point being they splintered from a true leftist party and were not from the centre. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Gladaed@feddit.org 2 points 3 days ago Moving the goal post. They arose from the SED. They are of leftist origin. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] BanMeFromPosting@lemmy.ml -3 points 3 days ago (5 children) "authoritarianism" is a concept made up by an anti-semetic CIA stooge in order to be able to equivocate between Nazis and communists. Its a completely meaningless term where every definition is either so broad that it describes all states (and almost just all social structures organised for any purpose) or so narrow it is just a synonym for whatever designated enemy you are being told is evil. It's about as cogent as "badguyism". permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] martti@suppo.fi 1 point 2 days ago (1 child) Tankie tears is music for my ears permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] BanMeFromPosting@lemmy.ml 1 point 2 days ago ? permalink fedilink source parent [–] LongLive@lemmy.world 2 points 3 days ago (2 children) links please, this is certainly unfamiliar permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] BanMeFromPosting@lemmy.ml 0 points 3 days ago Sure, what would you like links for? The stuff about Hannah Arendt or the critique of the theory of "authoritarianism"? The first I can provide, but let me know more specifically what so I dont overwhelm. The latter I cannot since the link is just Hannah Arendt and successors works'. I'd encourage you to actually read it with a critical eye and notice how vague it is. It is a theory that only cares about whether a state does stuff, not why or how or for whom or with what support. This is completely silly. Every state is authoritarian, every hierarchical organisation is authoritarian. Its a word used to make you think negatively of a group - Like how enemy states do not have governments, they have regimes and their VPs aren't VPs they're "hand picked successors". What I would really recommend is that you read "Blackshirts and Reds", "Inventing Reality" and Engels' "On Authority" permalink fedilink source parent [–] Gladaed@feddit.org 0 points 3 days ago Stalinism.ml permalink fedilink source parent
[–] martti@suppo.fi 1 point 2 days ago (1 child) Tankie tears is music for my ears permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] BanMeFromPosting@lemmy.ml 1 point 2 days ago ? permalink fedilink source parent
[–] LongLive@lemmy.world 2 points 3 days ago (2 children) links please, this is certainly unfamiliar permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] BanMeFromPosting@lemmy.ml 0 points 3 days ago Sure, what would you like links for? The stuff about Hannah Arendt or the critique of the theory of "authoritarianism"? The first I can provide, but let me know more specifically what so I dont overwhelm. The latter I cannot since the link is just Hannah Arendt and successors works'. I'd encourage you to actually read it with a critical eye and notice how vague it is. It is a theory that only cares about whether a state does stuff, not why or how or for whom or with what support. This is completely silly. Every state is authoritarian, every hierarchical organisation is authoritarian. Its a word used to make you think negatively of a group - Like how enemy states do not have governments, they have regimes and their VPs aren't VPs they're "hand picked successors". What I would really recommend is that you read "Blackshirts and Reds", "Inventing Reality" and Engels' "On Authority" permalink fedilink source parent [–] Gladaed@feddit.org 0 points 3 days ago Stalinism.ml permalink fedilink source parent
[–] BanMeFromPosting@lemmy.ml 0 points 3 days ago Sure, what would you like links for? The stuff about Hannah Arendt or the critique of the theory of "authoritarianism"? The first I can provide, but let me know more specifically what so I dont overwhelm. The latter I cannot since the link is just Hannah Arendt and successors works'. I'd encourage you to actually read it with a critical eye and notice how vague it is. It is a theory that only cares about whether a state does stuff, not why or how or for whom or with what support. This is completely silly. Every state is authoritarian, every hierarchical organisation is authoritarian. Its a word used to make you think negatively of a group - Like how enemy states do not have governments, they have regimes and their VPs aren't VPs they're "hand picked successors". What I would really recommend is that you read "Blackshirts and Reds", "Inventing Reality" and Engels' "On Authority" permalink fedilink source parent
[–] yucandu@lemmy.world 2 points 4 days ago (2 children) "Horseshoe theory" is the idea that I don't really care if I'm being killed by Hitler or Mao if I'm being killed. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] explodicle@sh.itjust.works 7 points 3 days ago Death by centrist is impersonal. It's your fault for not hustling hard enough for AC. permalink fedilink source parent [–] BanMeFromPosting@lemmy.ml 2 points 3 days ago I personally care a lot more about what the state suppresses, how it does it, for whom it does it, against whom it does it, why it does it, with how much public support it does it and what the effect of it is, rather than some simplistic black-and-white view that merely cares about whether a state does things or not. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] explodicle@sh.itjust.works 7 points 3 days ago Death by centrist is impersonal. It's your fault for not hustling hard enough for AC. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] BanMeFromPosting@lemmy.ml 2 points 3 days ago I personally care a lot more about what the state suppresses, how it does it, for whom it does it, against whom it does it, why it does it, with how much public support it does it and what the effect of it is, rather than some simplistic black-and-white view that merely cares about whether a state does things or not. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] bufalo1973@piefed.social 13 points 4 days ago* (2 children) The main difference between "neither left nor right" and far-right is hypocrisy. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 8 points 4 days ago* (1 child) Or sometimes denial permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Tiger@sh.itjust.works 5 points 4 days ago Don’t forget idiocy. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 8 points 4 days ago* (1 child) Or sometimes denial permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Tiger@sh.itjust.works 5 points 4 days ago Don’t forget idiocy. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] cabbage@piefed.social 22 points 4 days ago Some green parties tried the same nonsense for a while, though I think they all admit to being left by now. The argument was that they'd work independently of party blocks with climate as the only issue. Of course right wing politics are always an environmental disaster, but sometimes you would see unusual constellations in local politics. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 5 points 3 days ago* also notice the confusing "centre party" means they are "both sides", its to trick would be voters into voting for them who dont care enough to read past thier party name. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Airfried@piefed.social 6 points 3 days ago Reminder that the Nazis literally called themselves National Socialists. They were the opposite of course and swiftly destroyed any trace of socialism once they were in power. That's what far-rights do. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] DekSomBoon@lemmy.today 2 points 4 days ago (3 children) Wasn't fascism originally about being neither right nor left, but then it got sort of absorbed (or bought out) by the right to combat the left? Thats atleast how I've understood it, and of course there is so much more to fascism than that but thats just how i'd summarize it permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] saimen@feddit.org 10 points 4 days ago (2 children) I only know that the Nazis presented themselves as the "third way" between communism and capitalism. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] helvetpuli@sopuli.xyz 5 points 4 days ago https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ernst_R%C3%B6hm That didn't last long. permalink fedilink source parent [–] azimir@lemmy.ml 3 points 4 days ago Just like the AfD in Germany today. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] saimen@feddit.org 10 points 4 days ago (2 children) I only know that the Nazis presented themselves as the "third way" between communism and capitalism. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] helvetpuli@sopuli.xyz 5 points 4 days ago https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ernst_R%C3%B6hm That didn't last long. permalink fedilink source parent [–] azimir@lemmy.ml 3 points 4 days ago Just like the AfD in Germany today. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] helvetpuli@sopuli.xyz 5 points 4 days ago https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ernst_R%C3%B6hm That didn't last long. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] azimir@lemmy.ml 3 points 4 days ago Just like the AfD in Germany today. permalink fedilink source parent