583
Most gun owners use lead ammunition, yet half don’t practice hygiene behaviors after shooting (hsph.harvard.edu)
submitted 2 days ago by to c/science@lemmy.world
385 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 133 points 2 days ago* (32 children)

Bruh they put lead in gasoline until the 80s.

MAGA is 10% nazis, 10% cult members, 10% painfully-ignorant cunts, 69% lead addled boomers/genx

and 1% rich fucks manipulating the rest of them.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 32 child comments
    •
  • [–] 55 points 2 days ago (23 children)

    airplane fuel is still leaded.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 23 child comments
    •
  • [–] 81 points 1 day ago (3 children)

    You are correct, but since some may read that and assume that all aviation fuel is leaded, I wanted to add more info.

    Most people don't know that "airplane fuel" and "jet fuel" are different. Jet fuel is not leaded. The fuel used by small, piston-driven prop engines is. Because small piston aircraft still use leaded fuel, aviation is still the largest source of airborne lead emissions. The FAA is working to phase it out by 2030.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
    •
  • [–] 30 points 1 day ago

    You know what's funny? One of the "quirky" things about the Fallout Universe is how everything is radioactive because all their tech is based on fission/fusion right? It's meant to be funny like haha yeah our pollution is bad but atleast we're not poisoning ourselves with everything we do. Yet if you sub out "radioactive" for "heavy metal contamination" and "microplastics" etc that's basically 100% accurate to real life america.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 7 points 1 day ago

    Iirc locations downwind or under approach/depart flight lanes of small airports deal with an exposure risk fairly above baseline. I feel like I remember reading then that it ties into modern redlining where there are more minority populations in those areas due to cost of housing and the generational impacts of lead exposure.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 10 points 1 day ago (2 children)

    Just flew with 100LL, and I also clean up with anti-lead soap. I'm the only pilot I know who does this, but I can't wait to fly something electric ugh.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 11 points 1 day ago

    The politics and logistics issues holding back lead free avgas are extremely frustrating. I really thought we would have seen that transition by now.

    Who knows, maybe it will take electric aircraft to finally put an end to the issue.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • [–] -2 points 1 day ago (10 children)

    Most people don't handle airplane fuel

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 10 child comments
    •
  • [–] 16 points 1 day ago (1 child)

    The danger from leaded fuels don't come from handling, but from the exhaust. The lead becomes breathable and enters the environment, exposing those who lived in urban areas and near roads to more lead than others.

    The other poster isn't wrong about airplane fuel being leaded, but that can be misleading because most people don't know that "airplane fuel" and "jet fuel" are different. Jet fuel is not leaded, but the fuel used by small, piston-driven prop engines is.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
    •
  • [–] -4 points 1 day ago

    Yeah but the jet stream takes care of any concerning concentrations of exhaust.

    Even under 10,000 ft the atmospheric dispersion is orders of magnitude above surface.

    The turbulence at the surface on a bad day can 'lock out' the upper atmosphere sometimes, which is extra dangerous for surface car exhaust - but is actually beneficial the higher your altitude vs ground.

    So in all ways the ways airplane fuel would expose someone to lead, isnt experienced by the general populace. (minus directly handling the fuel, may have concentrated lead get on someone's hand/food, but thats another situation)

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 1 day ago (6 children)

    Does the lead in the exhaust come down into the air we breathe? Lead is heavy. Would probably be more in cities with airports and under flight paths. Diluted of course, but repeated every day... Perhaps a tin hat or mask would help.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
    •
  • [–] -2 points 1 day ago (4 children)

    Atmospheric dispersion is usually actually concerning good not bad, so it should dilute across the globe fairly quickly.

    Air pollution usually becomes an issue when something like nuclear waste reaches the atmosphere, cause we ALL get to breathe in that nuclear waste.

    But honestly some (probably large) percentage of meteors are lead deposited right to the atmosphere, cause its so atomically stable nearly everything decays to it.

    So no matter what there's some lead in the soup, and I can't see jet fuel being a large contributer (to an already small amount)

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
    •
  • [–] 6 points 1 day ago (2 children)

    Well jet exhaust would be a very large contributor if it were leaded, but luckily it isn't. It's just piston powered prop planes that use leaded "avgas", anything with a turbine uses an unleaded jet fuel.

    As it is, it's pretty bad, but it could be a lot worse. Airborne lead is really quite bad for many aspects of biology. If small planes stopped burning leaded fuel today, I'm quite sure we would be able to track a measurable difference in health and educational outcomes within a decade.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 1 point 1 day ago (1 child)

    Thats a good point, not even turboprops are leaded if I remember right.

    Obviously it'd require a lot of study to definitively say the impact of the lead, but I'm convinced the impact wouldn't be able to compare to natural levels in that atmospheric environment. Like we love our planes, but its still energetically really difficult for us to get them up there - but space rocks can have a hard time NOT burning up in our atmosphere. And lead is a larger than uniform part of our universe because its atomic stability, so odds are (IMO) atmospheres relatively lead-y, but have been for centuries.

    That and the difficulty creating hotspots in such a turbulent environment makes it required to increase the entire atmosphere's lead content to increase any one area to dangerous levels.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
    •
  • [–] 3 points 1 day ago

    Well honestly, I have to admit, I'd never previously considered the amount of lead added to the atmosphere by meteors. But considering it now... only about 6% of meteors are the metallic variety. I had to look up what the average chemical makeup of these is like, but it appears that they're mostly iron and nickel, with lead making up a small percentage of the remainder, probably less than 1%. So all and all, it doesn't seem like they actually deposit all that much lead.

    Conversely, the connection between the use of leaded gasoline and lead levels in the environment is really very well documented and clear. We know that eliminating it from standard gasoline has made a profound difference. The volume of exhaust from small planes is of course dwarfed by the volume from cars and trucks, so the damage that's still occurring is significantly less, but it's still meaningful.

    So... I don't have any solid data for you here, but my intuition is that a handful of meteors probably can't add close to as much lead to the atmosphere as millions of vehicles burning leaded gas.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 4 points 1 day ago*

    lol no. Lead in the atmosphere is a problem, because if it's in the atmosphere, you are breathing it. Remember that next time you see a gas plant spewing out exhaust.

    Nuclear power plants will not exhaust anything except water vapor unless things go terribly wrong. Things going terribly wrong basically cannot release radiation with modern designs unless you were to bomb the core directly, with large bombs to defeat the containment building and massive amounts of stuff surrounding them...

    Fossil fuels are infinitely worse for everyone than nuclear, with or without lead.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 6 points 1 day ago (3 children)

    1996 in the US.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
    •
  • [–] 2 points 1 day ago (2 children)

    Effective January 1, 1996, the Clean Air Act banned the sale of the small amount of leaded fuel that was still available in some parts of the country for use in on-road vehicles.

    Where were these places?

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 2 points 1 day ago

    IIRC farm co-ops, rural gas stations, bulk purchases for fleets, etc…

    I can remember my grandpa, a career trucker and grease monkey, grumbling about having to use lead substitute in his 60s Ford pickup when I was very young.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 1 day ago

    We had one gas station in my town in Oklahoma that sold it right up to the deadline. I used it because both my vehicles were built for it.

    Cars made before the 70s need the extra lubrication in the valves or the engines wear out much quicker. Engines made for unleaded fuel usually have valve sleeves to prevent excessive wear.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent