I'm starting to suspect the way I asked my question wasn't clear and you (and BaroqueInMind) aren't answering the question I meant to ask. Were you thinking my question involved LLM-generated code? I intended for my hypothetical to involve only wholely-human-authored code written with knowledge originally gained from LLM output.
(If you could read my first edit on my response to BaroqueInMind in this thread, I hope that'll clear up what I was trying to ask.)
(Also, I hate calling anything gotten from an LLM "knowledge" because implies LLMs are reliable sources of accurate information. I could simply call it "information", but that makes it sound like I'm talking about copying output from the LLM into the contribution itself when I actually mean information ingested into the human's brain and considered in the process of authoring code themselves with their own human brain. Please excuse the lack of better ways to language it.)
If you are saying that in order to qualify for inclusion on noailist.org a project must forbid the use of knowledge gained from generative AIs, I of course want to know that as well, but yeah. I just want to make sure we're not talking past each other.