you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 7 points 8 months ago (20 children)

This rhetoric is very dangerous. It's fueling censorship specifically targeting marginalized people

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 20 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (16 children)

    Sure, legalize smoking for 12 year olds so parents can regulate it themselves. Imbecilic reasoning.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 16 child comments
  • [–] -4 points 8 months ago (15 children)
  • [–] 1 point 8 months ago (10 children)

    I hate these people. I'm at a loss for words

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 8 months ago (9 children)

    You’re confused by the assertion that access to social media is at least as bad for children as some banned drugs? Is this your first day on earth?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] -1 points 8 months ago (8 children)

    It's not as bad as drugs. Don't give your kids phones. Be a parent. Don't need to upload all our data and Id to palantir databases for tracking under the same old "protect the children" bullshit

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (7 children)

    It's not as bad as drugs.

    Hard disagree.

    need to upload all our data

    This isn’t necessary. For instance, simply require any device to which children have access to preinstall software that blocks 90% of the internet. Problem solved.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 8 months ago* (6 children)

    Can you explain how social media would cause worse outcomes than kids doing hard drugs

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 8 months ago* (4 children)

    Currently it’s illegal for kids to smoke cigarettes, which is nowhere near as harmful as social media.

    You can read any of the gazillion pieces of research to reach this extremely obvious conclusion.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 8 months ago (3 children)

    I have read them. Cigarettes give you cancer and is not a hard drug. But it wasn't my argument. I would think if they're arguing it so blatantly they would have even a basic summary of why.

    This is patriot act levels of invasion. I need some damn answers why we're doing this all again

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (2 children)

    Social media isn’t even in the same class as smoking in terms of harm. It’s civilization ending. Smoking shortens lives on average. Social media is an existential threat. How do you think Trump got elected?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 8 months ago (1 child)

    I honestly just think you're wrong. I can see the point you'd like to make. I can give you the benefit of the doubt that social media as it is isn't great. But I also think you're wrong

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

    Idk if you’ve noticed, but in just 15 years, social media turned half of Americans into Nazis. People like McCain and Romney seem positively centrist.

    the effect of Facebook on Brazil:

    By comparison, smoking shortens people’s lives. Personally, I’d prefer a shorter life than a world where 90% of the most popular podcasts are a bunch of psychopaths.

    As someone steeped in technology, if I had a button that destroys the internet, I’m not sure if I should press it. Probably.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] -1 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (3 children)

    That's the point, it doesn't. Much like the argument about targeting marginalized people when you're talking about children.

    Edit: Yes, there are plenty of children and teens without access to information and the support structures they should have IRL. I was one of them and it's fucking awful. The internet can help with that by offering exposure to different ideologies, evidence that you aren't alone in what you're feeling or going through.

    But I don't look back on everything I did and encountered online in mid 00s - early 10s era internet and go "that was overwhelmingly a great thing that I should have had the sort of unrestricted access to that I did". And the internet has been even more corporatized and "skinner-boxed" since.

    And with the benefit of hindsight, I can see a bunch of other ways that I could have gotten the good I got from the internet without all the bad, and through things in real life that I had dismissed in my youth.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 8 months ago (2 children)

    we owe today's teens a better internet experience. we should focus on building something that would have been ideal for us to have had when we were their age

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 child)

    Teens and children, and the pushback you're seeing is because a lot of people, even terminally online people, believe that limiting or preventing children (and teens) from accessing social media as they currently exist is part of making that happen.

    You have to slow the bleeding first. You can't just ignore the broken leg and start physical therapy.

    Teens vary wildly in maturity and are likely to be unfortunately caught up in rules for children. There's no easy cutoff age before 18 for when one can be trusted to be online without guard rails. I can speak from experience that teens will find a way whether its legal or not, so I'm not really super concerned about the ones who need access. They'll find a way.

    And for every person like you that says they are still alive because of unrestricted internet, there's another one who is dead because of it. 4chan, tumblr, reddit even (remember when they "totally figured out the boston bomber"?), and more direct cyberbullying all claim lives. There were 3 suicides in my highschool growing up, two determined to be cyberbullying caused and the third just rumored. I almost lost one of my younger cousins to cyberbullying as well.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 8 months ago

    This isn't stopping the bleeding, the people who caused the bleeding in the first place of the ones doing this. I don't trust a single person in the Epstein files to have good intentions towards children or teenagers.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 0 points 8 months ago* (2 children)

    Some important context on this user before anyone else gets dragged into a discussion: check their post history, multiple to a "Youth Liberation" community.

    No shade meant by calling it out, but I think that makes it much more clear how strong your opinions are on this. There's nothing to be gained in trying to talk to you about this when your opinions are set so strongly. You aren't going to see the dangers that the rest of us see because your focus is on allowing freedom from oppresive parental figures.

    Edit: they also "won't give an inch on this"

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 8 months ago (1 child)

    "The dangers" are a moral Panic that's been kicked off by Nazis

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 0 points 8 months ago

    You can't seriously be saying that in the comments of a post linking to leaked internal documents showing that one of these companies is aware of the dangers they pose and damage they are doing. Did nazis falsify internal documents and this leak?

    Did you somehow miss the Cambridge Analytica scandal with Facebook, where they manipulated the emotional content of users' feeds and gathered scientifically significant measurable responses in the emotions of the manipulated users?

    Have you missed where each of these companies has had many public job postings for positions requiring applicants have psychology degrees?


    People like to think of 4chan as the website that drove people to suicide, but every single one of the major social media sites has a fucking body count at this point, and almost every one is in the double digits.


    Beyond all that, lemmy's userbase trends older. I saw the tail end of the satanic panic into the moral grandstanding about the dangers of violent video games. I'd wager most of the users here lived through it.

    I know firsthand what a moral panic looks like. They didn't have the amount of research papers (that hold up to peer review) and leaked internal documents we can point at. They didn't have body counts even remotely similar.


    Keep on fighting for opressed teens to have more ways to get away from opressive parents. To have access to factual information that their parents don't want them to have. It's a good cause with not many people fighting for it.

    That doesn't mean though that anything you think challenges or opposes it is a nazi plot.


    Teens are resilient and have astounding amounts of time on their hands. They'll find a way to communicate, ways to make their own underground social platforms if they need to. The cat's out of the bag. It's the fucking internet. Corpos, government boots, no one can truly stop the signal. They couldn't back in the days of dial up BBS. Good fucking luck now that you can get a device orders of magnitude more powerful for $50.


    Don't bother replying for my sake. I'm blocking you so I don't get increasingly shitty towards you. Your mind's made up on this, and so is mine. No point going back and forth if we're just going to get more frustrated and exasperated at each other. Best of luck in your endeavours.

  • source
  • parent