you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 238 points 5 months ago* (26 children)

Hey now, let's be clear. Stephen King did not have the clown defeated by a bunch of outcast youths gangbanging in a sewer. That's just patently incorrect. Every single part. No, he had the ancient terror disguised as a clown temporarily banished by summoning an ancient turtle from the dawn of time and engaging It in a battle of wills. Completely different and, in fact, perfectly reasonable. Anyone that's actually read the book knows the outcast youth sewer gangbang happens after that and actually has no bearing on the plot whatsoever. Stephen King's not some freak writing a book where the entire plot hinges on a bunch of traumatized kids screwing each other to save the world, no; he's a perfectly normal guy writing about a bunch of traumatized kids screwing each other for no reason at all. Bet you feel real silly now, huh?

  • source
  • hideshow 26 child comments
  • [–] 176 points 5 months ago (10 children)

    What the fuck are you on about? Nothing you said is remotely true, this is a gross misinterpretation of the events depicted in the book.

    It's not a gangbang, it's a train. They go one after the other.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] 52 points 5 months ago (9 children)

    I thought that in order to be a train they should be connected to each other.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 36 points 5 months ago (6 children)
  • [–] 13 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (5 children)

    There is an old painting about this. Tho they are adults.Gay ottoman erotica from 1700s where everyone forms a circular chain with their dicks and ass

    (Tuhfet Ul-Mulk by Shayk Al-Misri, 1773)

    (This is illustrated version of the Turkish translation from 1400s and there is an older, Arabic version from 1300s according to carbon-dating)

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 5 months ago (2 children)

    How the hell is that related? Those lads were merely showing a circle can be made with numerous stiff rods, a precursor to calculus. It has nothing to do with ancient terrors, god-like turtles or traumatized children having a gangbang in a sewer after killing what they thought was a supernatural clown. For shame!

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 21 points 5 months ago (6 children)

    Was there not some time traveling component? Like their future selves had to find each other again and come back ti their childhoods. I thought that was what made the "children having sex" part not as triggering as it sounds,because they were actually adults. Mind you, it's been years since I read the book. I might be misremembering things.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 44 points 5 months ago (2 children)

    So ... adult-minds having sex with children's bodies?

    That makes it worse!

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 15 points 5 months ago

    No, it is even more bizarre. They have sex because the group is lost in the sewer and apparently this makes them know where they are, somehow, so they can leave, which they then do. It adds literally nothing to the plot, apart from really shoddy symbolism of growing up.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 17 points 5 months ago* (3 children)

    I remember it being for the need to destroy their innocence or something

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 15 points 5 months ago (2 children)

    It was actually closer to needing to restore the power of friendship

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 5 months ago (2 children)