you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 33 points 3 weeks ago (54 children)

VR and AR both have massive unrealised potential. It just seems the tech isn't quite there to break through just yet, especially for AR.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 54 child comments
  • [–] 22 points 3 weeks ago (29 children)

    AR has so many unsolvable privacy issues it's wild ..

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 29 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 3 weeks ago (8 children)

    Honestly I don't need a camera or anything integrated but I'd love to have an integrated screen for my glasses. Would be nice when putting things together to just sync it with my phone and just have it there, also maps. Look I have to wear glasses all the time might as well add a tiny bit more utility.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 3 weeks ago (1 child)

    GPS with accelerometers should be able to work out where you're standing and where you're facing, so you could have navigation with a floating marker over the turn you need to take instead of just having a mini-map, too.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 3 weeks ago (3 children)
  • [–] 1 point 3 weeks ago (2 children)

    But are they intigratable in pre existing glasses? My prescription is non negotiable due to how bad my eyesight is without and I can't do contacts. Also having them sync with my phone and having them do little to no processing would be my preferred method, rather than having them contain all the computational shit themselves.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 2 weeks ago (1 child)

    No, they use a second set of prescription lenses for corrective lenses. They plug directly into your device via USB-C.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • Ew USB C wired connection no thanks. This would legit be a hard non starter for me, in my experience USB C wears out relatively fast and tends to fuck up on the data connection side even if the charging still works. Honestly with this type of thing I'll probably wait until I can just build my own thing, between proprietary bullshit and my own preferences it'd probably be better and piss me off less.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (2 replies)
  • [–] 8 points 3 weeks ago (7 children)

    It's solvable if you take surveillance capitalism out of the equation, just as Valve are doing. AR with Meta behind it will never be something that is socially acceptable since their whole business model is selling out the user and everyone around them. With a company like Valve which has a pretty good track record regarding privacy (a.k.a the only things transferred regarding usage are what games you play to make store recommendations fit your taste and bug reports if you approve them) i can see a wider adoption taking place.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 3 weeks ago (6 children)

    I don't think that's true, your personal privacy as the owner of the device is one thing, everyone else's right to not be continuously photographed is another. Having Valve operate it over meta doesn't solve that. Also, what happens when Gabe does and the investment bank that buys it decides they want to sell everyone data to maximise profit?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • load more comments (6 replies)
  • [–] 6 points 3 weeks ago (9 children)

    The meta display glasses would be cool if not for the whole meta part. You don't even need to be able to access the camera. It should just be used for tracking.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 3 weeks ago (8 children)

    That's not really AR then is it, AR requires the overlay on reality, I guess it could be like a game OSD but a lot of that detail is probably more annoying than anything. A live map might be good sometimes, but do I need my heart rate showing all the time in regular day to day life? is it helpful to have a shopping list taking up space in my vision all the time? How do I interact with it if it can't see my hands, do I then have to talk to it constantly to manipulate it? Can other people manipulate my OSD while I'm using it by saying the right thing? Seems pretty gimmicky ..

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 3 weeks ago (7 children)

    No, not what I meant. I meant environment tracking, hand tracking, everything.

    WE don't need access to the camera for AR to work, the device just needs to be able to process the video stream.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 3 weeks ago (6 children)

    The problem isnt your privacy, it's everyone else's. If there are glasses with cameras then some arsehole is running around photographing people without their permission. You might argue that if you're out in public then you can be photographed but that's a shit attitude, if someone is walking around photographing people they should at least have to make it obvious so people can have a say at the time or at least know about it before it turns out they are now an AI deepfake pornstar.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • load more comments (4 replies)
  • [–] 5 points 3 weeks ago (1 child)

    We've mostly been looking in to how it can be utilized in a production environment with detailed machine stats at a glance, live setpoints without having to be near the control panel, aids for maintenance...that sort of things

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (21 replies)