At a rally in Nebraska Tuesday night, President Trump told his supporters exactly what he thinks about the well-being of the American people.

Trump first said that the price of goods and services, which have gone up thanks to his ill-advised Iran war and tariff policies, were “just a little bit high. It’s a small price to pay for keeping the world safe—keeping our country safe.

“They can take out a city. Let them take, let them take out Los Angeles. Let them take out San Diego. This is a very small price to pay,” Trump said. “And it’s going to be over with very soon. It’s essentially almost over with.”

Conservative activists have argued that Trump didn’t really mean that losing the two cities is a “small price to pay,” but that he was referring to high gas prices. In that generous interpretation, Trump was arguing that his war, which has killed scores of civilians in the Middle East and an estimated 23 U.S. soldiers, is preventing Iran from waging large scale attacks on American cities. But Iran’s targets during the war have been U.S. installations in the Middle East, and it wasn’t targeting American cities before the war either.

California leaders, however, have taken his words at face-value.

Advocating for the mass death of his own citizens?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [S] 31 points 3 days ago (9 children)

Trump v. United States, 603 U.S. 593 (2024) (holding that presidential immunity from criminal prosecution presumptively extends to all of a president's "official acts" – with absolute immunity for official acts within an exclusive presidential authority that Congress cannot regulate such as the pardon, command of the military, execution of laws, or control of the executive branch).

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 50 points 3 days ago (5 children)

    It's still treason. They've just removed judicial/ legal remedies. Leaving only...

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 2 days ago (2 children)

    Is campaigning an “official act” though?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] [S] 2 points 2 days ago (1 child)

    His invitation would be a mix of diplomacy and intell gathering, thus him in his official capacity.

    -His lawyers and the coming SCOTUS opinion.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment