1. Be civil
No trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour
2. No politics
This is non-politics community. For political memes please go to !politicalmemes@lemmy.world
3. No recent reposts
Check for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month
4. No bots
No bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins
5. No Spam/Ads
No advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live.
A collection of some classic Lemmy memes for your enjoyment
I'm getting sick of the invasive questions
"Gender?
Sex at birth?
Are you trans?
Are you gay? Bi?
Ever been depressed?
Abuse alcohol? Drugs?
Ever been arrested?
Ever been in the military?
Well what about your spouse?
Ever work for the government?
That degree you mentioned, we can't ask your age but uh, when did you earn that bad boy, huh?"
NONE OF THIS HAS ANYTHING TO DO WITH THE POSITION.
This is 100% occuring in the USA. Where I live and work.
Most of these questions are illegal in my country, thank fuck
thank fuck
No, thank the government and the people who voted.
No, thank the workers who literally died fighting for worker rights, which forced the government's hands in order to keep the peace.
Died and often killed, don't forget that demonstrations are the compromise for a civil discourse. When not being treated civilly, it quickly becomes a mob and the lynching begins.
OP is full of shit. See my response.
https://old.lemmy.world/comment/15656902
Those questions are begging for discrimination lawsuits. Despite being heavily involved in onboarding at two companies, I'm not sure which of those are legal to ask because no one asks.
Almost none of that is asked on an application except the degree date. All of the above would be a fucking nightmare for HR. You really think employers are dumb enough to ask questions that could lead to discrimination lawsuits?!
After you are hired, the forms ask:
You made some of that up out of thin air and didn't understand the rest. And here ya got 61 upvotes from people taking all that at face value. Be better.
SOURCE: Worked IT for an employment firm with 200 employers. Designed and posted hiring forms, hiring data and onboarding at two places. Learned more about hiring than I ever wanted to know.
Gender?
Present.
Sex at birth?
No, my first time was well over a decade later.
Are you trans?
Transtabular, from your position.
Are you gay? Bi?
I prefer professionalism to gaiety during interviews. This meeting isn't over yet.
Ever been depressed?
Not in the button sense, no.
Abuse alcohol? Drugs?
Neither physically nor emotionally. No, thank you, not now.
Ever been arrested?
Have you been?
Ever been in the military?
Even if I was, you're not getting veteran's benefits through me.
Well what about your spouse?
Even if they were, you're not getting veteran's benefits through them.
Ever work for the government?
Why, are you paying public service rates?
That degree you mentioned, we can’t ask your age but uh, when did you earn that bad boy, huh?
I think it was sometime around when I graduated from college.
Bro, your answer is being filtered out by an algorithm, even before it gets the chance to be appreciated by some hr drone.
Oh, I assumed this was during an interview already. If a company sent me that shit prior to an interview I'd tell the headhunter to try again with a better company.
Gender?
Sex at birth?
Are you trans?
Are you gay? Bi?
Ever been depressed?
Abuse alcohol? Drugs?
Ever been arrested?
Ever been in the military?
Well what about your spouse?
Ever work for the government?
That degree you mentioned, we can't ask your age but uh, when did you earn that bad boy, huh?
I'm just trying to get an egg loan! There's people in line behind me!
Right out of college, I went through an eight hour long hiring process complete with a proctored exam, three different interviews, a psychological screening, and a meeting with the CEO. All for an entry level position that paid $25k. By the end of the day, I was the only candidate left to be considered and they didn't give me an offer.
I got a call and a quick phone interview two days later from a small independent IT company that quoted me $30k on the spot. I said I was considering a second position and - over the phone - the guy raises it to $35k. Took the deal. Started a week later.
Two months after that, I got a postcard in the mail saying I was no longer being considered for the first job.
This was in 2006 and its only gotten worse since.
entry level job; salary range $30,000 - $150,000 depending on qualifications and experience; 10 yrs experience required; high school diploma required, Phd preferred
apply today!
Sorry we’ve decided to move forward with other candidates (You’re not the VP’s son).
1 month later, the exact same job posting is listed again
Phd preferred
Weird way to spell required
My last job had close to that range. There is a hiring range is typically 50-70% of the maximum. Below 50% is the developmental range for laddering underqualified internal hires. Over 70% is for very experienced, overqualified candidates. Generally employers won't go more than 85% of max because they need a couple years of cushion for salary increases. If they hire at max they know the candidate is going to be back on the market in a year.
It almost seems like it would be better to quote only the range at which they intend to actually hire, rather than dangling the best case maximum you could ever potentially earn at the absolute pinnacle of your tenure in the position. But maybe other smarter-than-me people expect the top number to mean that?
Poor people always land the most competitive salaries…
The salary competes with the bills
Real conversation, not exaggerated. Actually slightly toned down:
"We offer a competitive salary! It's $number!"
"I have 2 offers 10% higher, from a shipping company and a finance company, in the same city"
"We don't compete with the finance and shipping sectors"
"And 15% higher in one of the consultancies"
"We don't compete with consultancies either"
(I think I'm going to put Reigninh Monarch of Norway on my CV. I just don't compete with King Harald.)
LOL I hope you told them "Dude you ARE competing with those companies for my skills, so are you in or not?" It's really that simple.
At one interview I wasn't really sure about my answer to a question, so after giving it I asked how they would do it, and the guy who asked said, "Well, I'm not the one being interviewed." I kept my mouth shut because I really liked everybody else I had talked to, but I wanted to go all Jules on the guy like, "Oh yes you are, Brett, yes you are!" Some employers don't get that an applicant is also interviewing them (at least I always was).
Haha, that's the attitude :)
I did say, in a nice way, that "they are your competitors either way".
And yeah, companies treating interviews as a one-way evaluation is a red flag.
There was this book that was hype around 2010, called "Are you smart enough to work at Google?". It was full of interview questions and brainteasers that I strongly suspected I'd find interesting, but I couldn't get over the title. I wanted to scream "Fuck you, book! Is Google smart enough to hire ME?!"
We are, as a profession, systematically manipulated via these interview processes to feel stupid and inferior to drive down wages. I'd rather come off as slightly too arrogant now and then, rather than submit to that.
Well said! Many companies have the attitude, "You're lucky we let you have this job, and we can take it away any time!" And many employees totally believe it, no matter how talented they are. But you can't live other people's lives for them. After switching to contract work my only regret was that occasionally there were people I wished I could have worked with longer. But that's life.
I actually took a google screening test around 2010, and they did call me back to go to the next step, which was kind of an ego boost. Other things came up and I never followed through, so no idea if they would have hired me or not. Sometimes ignorance is bliss.
"Our company develops AI. It has many uses and should substitute for human labor whenever possible."
"USE OF AI BY APPLICANTS IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED!"
As funny as it is when presented that way, it does make sense. After all if a company is using AI wherever possible, and yet hiring a person, then presumably it's because they want that person to do things they don't want to be using AI for.
Fuck that! I just hired two people and during the screener I told them the base and comp plan so we don't all waste our time in a mutual ruined-orgasm masturbation session.
And by competitive, we mean it will make you compete for the last scraps at the food bank.
I'm just glad I never had to put up with corpo shit like that. I only work for smaller businesses with like at max 20 people. Pay is usually a bit worse at the start, but it's easier to ask for raises down the line and at least I'm treated like a human, not a number in lexware.
The fact that the majority of us are essentially forced to participate in the capitalist market means that we will always be at the mercy of greasy, compliant, ass-sucking 'bosses.'
We don't have any freedom with work unless we have the freedom not to work.
I once saw an ad looking to hire someone with a BA that knew 3 computer programming languages for $8 an hour.
I know JavaScript, TypeScript, and ECMAScript.
I've also noticed “competitive” seems to mean “just above what they believe the competition's minimum is”, and together they and their competition drive the wages down.
i wonder if family structures will change to be closer to that of India as children are forced to stay with their parents longer and longer
There was an article about staffing agencies spamming LLM generated CVs to companies to saturate the market and convince companies that hiring is impossibly hard
Had a job interview once where they asked me how much I was expecting to make. I told them and they responded with "Yeah, I think we can do that." Then when they called me to offer me the job they had lowered it by a few bucks an hour. I took it because I had to at the time. They knew that people are desperate and this was their strategy with everyone. Fucking scum.
LPT:
"What are you expecting to make?"
Correct answer: Your real target (based on your own market research for the position) +15%.
Why? Because they're going to target your acceptable range at -10%, and make the offer right around there.
Then, you can come back and say "I might be able to make that work, as long as X, Y and / or Z are part of the package" where XYZ is anything from remote work to reimbursement for commute mileage.
If they say no to the added XYZ and you're desperate, well go ahead and accept, because you've just earned yourself +5% of what you were targeting. If they say yes, well, even better.
Don't go higher than 15% - this could kill the offer entirely if you misjudge the interview. 15% seems to be the sweet spot in my experience, based on a 30 year career.