all 26 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 57 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (7 children)

I don't get it. (Update: Now I get it, but I wish that I could go back to the way things were before I found out.)

  • source
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 37 points 6 months ago (1 child)

    Kk that took me a minute. And yeah... Yikes lol

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 18 points 6 months ago (1 child)

    I wish I didn't know now what I didn't know then.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 13 points 6 months ago*

    Some knowledge is cursed. There are things we're not supposed to know.

  • source
  • [–] 12 points 6 months ago (6 children)

    Scientifically accurate Ducktales

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 6 months ago (4 children)

    d-d-d-danger lurks behind you

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 6 months ago

    If you know, you know.

  • source
  • [–] 8 points 6 months ago (2 children)

    It's so the male duck can scrape the semen of any previous partners out of the female duck's vagina. This was a random mutation that somehow became dominant because it perpetuated the species. Unlike leaving all that semen in there, which ... wouldn't ... have?

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 15 points 6 months ago (1 child)

    Remember, sexual selection favors traits that benefit the carrier, being able to have a mate exclusively bear their offspring and excluding competitors would favor their genes, unlike the mate potentially bearing offspring from multiple contributors (even within a single clutch, but I’m not sure about that part, not a biologist)

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 3 points 6 months ago