this post was submitted on 02 Aug 2026
825 points (98.7% liked)

World News

57368 readers
2077 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] filister@lemmy.world 9 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

Unfortunately the problem with global warming is that it happens very slowly over time. Scientists were warning us of the impacts of global warming for at least a decade but we have somehow prioritized the short term gains and now we and our children will bear the fruits of our negligence.

[–] floofloof@lemmy.ca 13 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago) (1 children)

Scientists were warning us of the impacts of global warming for at least a decade

They've been warning us with some urgency since at least the 1970s. There were concerns published about it in the late 19th century. By the early 1990s the warnings were loud and clear for everyone to hear.

[–] filister@lemmy.world 8 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

Yes, this makes us even more ignorant. At some point in the past I was kind of hopeful we as united humanity can overcome this problem, like with the ozone layer hole, but then these individualistic policies started to sweep over the world and people started to care about other problems more.

[–] raspberriesareyummy@lemmy.world 1 points 49 minutes ago

We needed to bring out pitchforks and torches to dethrone the ultra wealthy like... 30 years ago.

[–] pigup@lemmy.world 12 points 7 hours ago (2 children)

Do you think burning more coal would help?

Needs more data centers

[–] UltraGiGaGigantic@lemmy.ml 4 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago)

Depends... who is on top of the burning pile of coal?

[–] gandalf_der_13te@feddit.org 5 points 6 hours ago (3 children)

so just to put this in context: we're having a doubling of installed solar capacity around every 3 years. currently we have 3% of total energy supply from solar energy. so it will take maybe another 15 years to get close to 100% renewable energy (if we assume that exponential growth continues). source: ourworldindata (go to website and hover over solar energy to see numbers)

so we'll end up in 2040 with roughly ... let me do the math ... 1.6°C total temperature difference compared to 1970 in 2040?

[–] shrippen@feddit.org 1 points 58 minutes ago

If you assume the warming stops on its own. But there are processes that accelare themselves

[–] textik@sh.itjust.works 14 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago)

Not to detract from your point, but assuming that exponential growth continues is one of the classic statistical blunders.

[–] Raiderkev@lemmy.world 1 points 6 hours ago

Sorry, solar panels are woke and uh kill birds or something. BANNED.

[–] Gammelfisch@lemmy.world 26 points 10 hours ago

During the late 1970's, ExxonMobil scientists predicted global warming would accelerate with use of fossil fuels. They were shockingly accurate and the f'ed up weather patterns are the result. Keep buying and driving gas guzzlers.

[–] DigiHippie@lemmy.world 9 points 10 hours ago

Drill baby drill.

[–] RunawayFixer@lemmy.world 41 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

Crypto farming, feeding the ai bubble, large scale wars of aggression, commuters replacing cars with trucks, buying throwaway junk has never been easier. That's the relatively new completely unnecessary hubris that I can think off atm. These should be the low hanging fruits to just not do, but apparently we're going to continue doing them anyways. If we can't address the low hanging fruits, then tackling the harder challenges will remain a pipe dream until it's too late. Climate stability is fucked, and we're in for a rough ride.

[–] DudleyMason@lemmy.ml 16 points 12 hours ago (3 children)

The real "low hanging fruit to not do" is blaming individual choices for societal issues. Capitalism is the one and only reason for anthropogenic climate change. Ending capitalism is the one and only way to solve it. There is no individual action you can take that is effective, we have to reorder society in such a way that it is impossible to profit from environmental destruction.

[–] gandalf_der_13te@feddit.org 4 points 6 hours ago

the only real solution to climate change is renewable energy, and solar energy in particular. capitalism or no capitalism basically doesn't matter.

[–] 7101334@lemmy.world 1 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago)

Like 3/5 things that poster mentioned were not individual choices. The 2/5 that are individual choices are real issues. It is an issue, not just societally but also environmentally and in terms of public health, that the world is polluted by plastic because people wanted momentary convenience. Capitalism has to end and it incentivizes those choices of convenience, but people are still simultaneously responsible for making those choices unless they have no alternative... in which case it's not really a choice.

[–] Eheran@lemmy.world 1 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

Human nature is the reason. Regardless of the system we live in. People want more, better, etc. and feel important/strong/rich/... It has always been like that. Heck, even monkeys display such things.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] DarkFuture@lemmy.world 25 points 15 hours ago (2 children)

We can't even stop a rise in fascism, an incredibly stupid thing, across the globe. We don't stand a chance against global warming. We're cooked.

[–] gandalf_der_13te@feddit.org 1 points 6 hours ago

we can't even stop a rise in fascism because we lack the tools to do so, most importantly we lack the tool of understanding. we don't even understand what fascism is or why people follow it, thus we stand no chance of tackling the problem at its root. if you really want to combat fascism, you have to understand it first.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 13 points 14 hours ago (4 children)

We've done more in the last five years to curb fossil fuel consumption than at an point in human history.

From a massive pivot to renewable energy to our Green-Centric foreign policy of blowing up Nordstrem II, embargoing Venezuela, and shutting down the Straight of Hormuz, we are absolutely turning a corner on future fossil fuel consumption.

Donald Trump may go down in history as the most climate friendly leader in our generation. A hundred thousand Greenpeace activists could not have achieved in their lifetime what he's done in less than two terms as president.

[–] dactylotheca@suppo.fi 3 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

Fossil fuel consumption hasn't actually gone down. All the renewable sources have come on top of energy from nonrenewable ones

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 1 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

Fossil fuel consumption hasn’t actually gone down.

Hasn't it? We've cut shipped supplies by around 20% and prices have jumped into the $100/bbl range.

[–] floofloof@lemmy.ca 1 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago)

And one main reason the prices aren't worse and the fuel hasn't run dry is that China massively ramped up its use of coal.

More. But enough?

[–] VitoRobles@lemmy.today 3 points 9 hours ago

Those billionaire yachts aren't going to fuel themselves!

[–] vinsombra@lemmy.world 10 points 14 hours ago

Hilariously, you are right. It certainly wasn't his intention to do so, but it is happening. Strangely aligned with China spending like crazy to pivot to a green energy super-supplier. End of an era, although no one will admit it yet.

[–] Stonewyvvern@lemmy.world 8 points 12 hours ago

That's my bad...I was super gassy the other week. I'll back on the beans and onions.

[–] Godric@lemmy.world 15 points 17 hours ago

Goes outside

Ah shit, no way!

load more comments
view more: next ›