The U.S. Army has used up much of its stockpile of highly accurate long-range missiles during its five-month war with Iran, according to three people familiar with the data, raising concerns about the military's ​readiness for future conflicts.

The missiles are principally the Army's surface-to-surface weapons, known as Army Tactical Missile Systems (ATACMS) and Precision Strike Missiles (PrSM). The U.S. has used "virtually all" of these weapons, according to two of the sources.

The ‌degree to which the military is running out of ATACMS and Precision Strike Missiles has not been previously reported.

The long-range munitions are an important part the military's arsenal, allowing accurate strikes from a safe distance. U.S.-supplied ATACMS have played a key role in the war in Ukraine, allowing Ukrainian forces to attack targets inside Russia. The PrSM is a newer, more advanced generation that will replace the ATACMS, which have a shorter range.

top 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 137 points 2 months ago (9 children)

And accomplished sweet fuck all

  • source
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 103 points 2 months ago (4 children)

    They accomplished a lot:

    • Throw a lifeline to Putin in the form of higher oil prices.
    • Further undermine the international standing of the US.
    • Make a complete mockery of whatever rules based order they've pretended to support.
    • Encourage Xi to move against Taiwan.

    The dismantling of the American empire is proceeding according to plan.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 56 points 2 months ago (2 children)

    Don't forget that stockpiled weapons don't make any profit. You have to use them to create the need to make more. And make the military industrial complex more money. And those who speculate on those same companies.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • [–] 112 points 2 months ago (6 children)

    So glad we’ve been spending billions building and stockpiling these things for my entire life, only to run out after [checks notes] six months of bullshit that accomplished nothing.

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 27 points 2 months ago (2 children)

    Time to buy Lockhead Martin and Raytheon stocks before they hand the resupply bill to the Dems after midterms! /s ?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 22 points 2 months ago* (2 children)

    Turns out giving a low IQ pedo the keys to the kingdom isn't such a great idea.

    Really wish conservatives/regressives weren't so painfully stupid/bigoted.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 2 months ago

    The keys were for a bunch of expensive bullshit though.

    Yes, the idiot deciding to use them is a problem - but so is the fact that they don't work. America was bragging that other nations would find out why they don't have healthcare . . . .except there's not even the capability they thought they had.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • [–] 46 points 2 months ago (2 children)

    Army Tactical Missile Systems (ATACMS)

    Count on the army to refer to their missiles as "attack 'em"s.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 36 points 2 months ago (4 children)

    The billionaires need to pony up now so we can build more.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 30 points 2 months ago (2 children)

    Becoming clear that the military industrial complex is actually a very badly diaguised kleptocracy, not that I like either option.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 28 points 2 months ago (8 children)

    Yeah, the one thing this Admin can't hide at the end of the day is how much money has been evaporated between the war and whatever financial schemes they've enacted along the way. Hope the Repubs love paying for that

  • source
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 14 points 2 months ago (7 children)

    It wont be an issue unless the dems get the house and/senate.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 2 months ago (6 children)

    And if that happens the Republicans will spend the next however long it takes them to win it back loudly demanding the Democrats somehow eliminate the deficit and cut any program the Republicans don't like (I.E. anything that helps people instead of lining the pockets of the oligarchs).

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 2 months ago (3 children)

    And the Democrat who's elected will be at best a centrist DINO who won't do anything to move the needle, playing into the eventuality of a Trump 3.0.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 2 months ago (1 child)

    I will never not use the opportunity to post this: https://www.milwaukeeindependent.com/thom-hartmann/two-santas-strategy-gop-used-economic-scam-manipulate-americans-40-years/

    Here’s how it works, laid it out in simple summary:

    First, the Two Santas strategy dictates, when Republicans control the White House they must spend money like a drunken Santa and cut taxes to run up the U.S. debt as far and as fast as possible.

    This produces three results: it stimulates the economy thus making people think that the GOP can produce a good economy; it raises the debt dramatically; and it makes people think that Republicans are the “tax-cut Santa Clauses.”

    Second, when a Democrat is in the White House, Republicans must scream about the national debt as loudly and frantically as possible, freaking out about how “our children will have to pay for it!” and “we have to cut spending to solve the crisis!” Shut down the government, crash the stock market, and damage US credibility around the world if necessary to stop Democrats from spending money.

    This will force the Democrats in power to cut their own social safety net programs and even Social Security, thus shooting their welfare-of-the-American-people Santa Claus right in the face.

    And, sure enough, here we are now with a Democrat in the White House. Following their Two Santas strategy, Republicans are again squealing about the national debt and refusing to raise the debt ceiling, imperiling Biden’s economic recovery as well as his Build Back Better plans.

    And, once again, the media is covering it as a “Biden Crisis!” rather than what it really is: a cynical political and media strategy devised by Republicans in the 1970s, fine-tuned in the 1980s and 1990s, and rolled out every time a Democrat is in the White House.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • [–] 21 points 2 months ago (5 children)

    It's just exposing how the weapons belong to a dead end tech tree. The future of war is getting fragged by dollar store drones.

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 2 months ago (4 children)

    Honestly I don't think that's what we're looking at. This is closer to what happened with machine guns and then later tanks during WW1 and WW2. What we're looking at is a cavalry charge getting shredded by a machine gun and saying mobile warfare is dead, meanwhile the British and French are doing tank R&D.

    This happens every couple of decades and lasts about a decade before proper counters can be developed, mind you it's still busted as shit until said counters appear but still.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 18 points 2 months ago*

    One man's shortage is another man's bounty.

  • source
  • [–] 16 points 2 months ago

    It's a good thing we still live in a world where there's a rule of law and we don't have enemies that might take advantage of our military weakness and like attack us or something

  • source
  • [–] 13 points 2 months ago (1 child)

    This is what you get when you have an incompetent president whose only "strategy" is to use the military as an extension of his angry outbursts and an equally incompetent secretary of "war" who also believes the only thing necessary to solve the world's problems is an army full of testosterone laden christian warriors let loose with full abandon. And if it diminishes America's standing in the world or its ability to defend itself, all the better.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 12 points 2 months ago (2 children)

    What would conservatives/regressives be doing if they weren't wasting all our money on things that don't benefit Americans?

    It's almost like we should be voting for the other side that's proven to be better regarding our tax dollars and economy as a whole. But I guess we could keep voting for the side that's openly bigoted and really, really bad at managing money. You know, for the lols.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
    [–] 10 points 2 months ago (9 children)

    Why do I have a terrible sneaking suspicion, propaganda or not, that this will be used as an excuse.

    Rumors are floating that Russia is toying with making a move on Poland, or perhaps a smaller NATO member. One theory is they're just posturing to detract from the situation with Ukraine and appear strong. Despite this, Ukraine relies heavily on assistance from EU/NATO countries for supplies/money. Even mildly credible threats may force some of those countries to scale back some assistance and focus on internal efforts, which impacts Ukraine's supply chain.

    How does this tie in with the US? If a NATO country is attacked and goes Article 5...the US might try to use this as an excuse for lack of significant aid.

  • source
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • load more comments (8 replies)
    [+] 10 points 2 months ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 child)
    load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 8 points 2 months ago (1 child)

    This just means we will transition to cheaper less accurate ordinance, killing even more innocent civilians.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 8 points 2 months ago

    Capitalism compromises national security.

  • source
  • [–] 7 points 2 months ago

    Those missiles could have been put to an actual use, like arming Ukraine.

  • source
  • [–] 7 points 2 months ago

    its soley used for targets that cant fight back.

  • source
  • [–] 6 points 2 months ago (13 children)

    I'm having trouble deciding if that's a good thing or a bad thing.

    It would have been better for Ukraine to use them against Russia.

    On the other hand, now it's less likely trump will start another war.

  • source
  • hideshow 13 child comments
  • [–] 19 points 2 months ago* (5 children)

    Now it's less likely Trump will start another war

    I am not convinced.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • load more comments (7 replies)
    [–] 6 points 2 months ago

    Mockheed Lartin is loving this.

  • source
  • [–] 5 points 2 months ago

    Oh bot I sure love living in Taiwan right now

  • source
  • load more comments
    view more: next ›