top 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 252 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

I use those to train my AI though. It’s not piracy if there’s money.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 38 points 2 weeks ago

    It was openai or meta that claimed because they didn't seed the torrent that it wasn't really piracy.

    So piracy only starts becoming bad when it takes the form of communism/socialism lol.

    The theft for a major corperation? Thats just good ol reliable capitalism.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 140 points 2 weeks ago (18 children)

    Non of the people pirating content have money to buy more stuff. These tens of billions they talk about don't exist.

  • source
  • hideshow 18 child comments
  • [–] 100 points 2 weeks ago (9 children)

    Non of the people pirating content have money to buy more stuff

    How DARE you!

    My piracy is morally; not financially driven

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 21 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

    Mine's mostly financial, my moral objection is to streaming shows where, even if you have money, you can't buy the show on DVD.

    Though I wonder if streaming legally and ripping illegally would be the next viable option. Netflix's 720p streams are largely unprotected.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • [–] 30 points 2 weeks ago* (5 children)

    I would be surprised if most US politicians are capable of understanding the concept of duplicating files on a computer

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 15 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

    You are correct. It's like expecting car salesmen to be able to understand how to do brain surgery.

    Most politicians are failed lawyers. And if they are too incompetent or corrupt to be representing people or entities in court, they sure are hell shouldn't be making calls about anything in society or in the political realm. And that obviously includes technology.

    Remember when late Alaska Senator Ted Stevens described (with great confidence) that the Internet "is like a series of tubes"? Classic example of their wider incompetence right there.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
  • load more comments (2 replies)
  • [–] 24 points 2 weeks ago

    You think they care about things like facts, or logic? No. This is, and always has been about control.

    Even the business side of things know piracy doesn't actually hurt business, it helps it. They've conducted studies on this since 2004. They found that the vast majority of pirates are actually the biggest spenders. They found more often than not a pirate will download a movie, or an album or a game, or whatever. Then within a month buy that same thing they just pirated.

    Thats the reason you used to see these record labels try to stop piracy back in the days of kazaa and napster, and limewire. There used to be lawsuits where they'd sue some household for 20 million dollars. Knowing they don't have it. Well what ended up happening is they ended up suing this elderly man who had no idea what limewire was. He didn't know how to use a computer. And the only one who used the computer was the 8 year old boy, who now had to live with his grandpa, because both his parents were killed by a drunk driver. Now this record label was trying to put his grandfather 20 million in debt. For someone who had no idea who the black eyed peas. When they kept asking him about it, he asked why they kept asking him about soup if this was about music theft.

    As the case went on, it was revealed that between his parents, and other family members, he had a cd collection, including the albums accused of stealing, worth over $5,000 worth of cds.

    The whole thing turned the public against record labels, and painted them as the bad guys for trying to ruin peoples lives over music. To this day I haven't heard of another time they tried that tactic.

    And the republicans know this.

    You have to remember one thing. The cruelty is the point. It doesn't need to make sense. It just needs to punish their enemies. And at times even punish their own base. I saw a story last night where a guy who voted for trump was complaining that insulin used to be $6, and now it's $80 under trumps new plan. And he said "I didn't think it would happen to ME!"

    And thats where we are right now. Just leaving the fuck around stage. Now entering the find out portion of our journey.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 119 points 2 weeks ago

    Thank GOD! ONLY Billionaires should be Allowed to Pirate EVERYTHING EVER MADE!

    -Republicans!

  • source
  • [–] 86 points 2 weeks ago (5 children)

    Meta, X, and ChatGPT have all automated mass piracy of art, music, articles, and anything their genAI touches. Surely you mean to start there?

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 72 points 2 weeks ago (8 children)

    Piracy keeps the poors occupied and busy so they don’t riot. There’s no blood left to squeeze from that rock, they’re not going to buy streaming. Games are in decline as systems die of go outdated, and corporate erodes the quality of development.

    They’re idiots if they push this bill in earnest.

    Look what happened the last time people had too much time on their hands (Covid). And everyone has a lot more to pissed about, now.

  • source
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 26 points 2 weeks ago (7 children)

    Your last paragraph crossed my mind recently as the oil prices really start to spiral out of control. There were so many protests bordering on riots because people were stuck at home due to covid - now we're already hearing news that truckers are starting to sit idle instead of driving at a loss.

    Imagine how much free time and how much anger everyone will have when the economy grinds to a halt from product shortages all over the country.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • load more comments (7 replies)
  • [–] 65 points 2 weeks ago* (2 children)

    meaning, "Block whichever sites we say."

    Yet another FREEDOM bill from the Party of FREEDOM

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
    [–] 62 points 2 weeks ago

    Oh, I run a new company called FaceMeta, and this is all being stolen for “training” - therefore perfectly 100% legal according to capitalism

  • source
  • [–] 62 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)
    load more comments (3 replies)
    [–] 61 points 2 weeks ago (9 children)

    how do they plan to enforce this with foreign VPNs?

  • source
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 79 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

    Don't try to explain technology to them. It won't work.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 17 points 2 weeks ago

    they'll try to pass it anyway. if republicants lose majority, it'll be a horrific couple of months as they try to ram and cram every piece of shit legislation they can think of through before the new session starts.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (3 replies)
    [–] 53 points 2 weeks ago (4 children)

    "Issa argued that online piracy helps fund terrorist groups and other criminal networks. ". I never thought of AI companies as terrorists, but it's a good label for the harm it's caused

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 53 points 2 weeks ago (5 children)

    It'd really be nice if "Huh. This protects corporate interests more than taxpayer interests. Denied." was a thing in government.

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 45 points 2 weeks ago (8 children)

    soo many stupid things with this... but this one i thougt funny.. its like the poopholeloophole... restaurant wifi is exempt

    It would also exclude Wi-Fi networks offered on the premises of airports, libraries, restaurants, retail stores, and similar establishments.

  • source
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 23 points 2 weeks ago (4 children)

    I wonder if someone is going to go around chucking solar enabled pi’s onto the roofs of fast food joints and set them up with wireguard or headscale and sell it as proxy network.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
  • load more comments (3 replies)
    [–] 44 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

    I have a seedbox in a country that gives no fucks, so I'll just use a DNS provider in a country that gives no fucks. You can make it harder, but you can't make it impossible.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 21 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

    And it's not like it's so much harder to press a few extra buttons. Bonus: you're safer online, so if anyone wants to go down the road, they'll just be safer online.

    They're all a bunch of fucking idiots, the people making these bills.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 22 points 2 weeks ago (1 child)

    Wish people would realize they are NOT idiots.

    This erodes privacy and allows character assassinations on anyone who wants to be safe and/or private by using those VPN that do not comply. Is your mega ISP really going to stand up for your rights under this? Can you really get a new ISP at the "press of a few buttons"?

    You aren't the only one here not understanding how "this doesn't directly affect me" bc you have the technical skills to avoid it. It does affect you, even if only by the chilling effect of it being more difficult to discuss online.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • [–] 43 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

    For people who hate the government, they sure like using it to oppress everyone else.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • load more comments (3 replies)
    [–] 40 points 1 week ago (1 child)

    So it'll block ChatGPT and others?

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 38 points 1 week ago

    Piracy is only okay for AI companies.

  • source
  • [–] 24 points 1 week ago
    [–] 23 points 2 weeks ago

    “Site-blocking orders force any service provider, from residential broadband providers to global DNS resolvers, to disrupt traffic from targeted websites simply accused of copyright infringement.”

    I know a few sites I can accuse of copyright infringement... (x, M$, FB, etc.)

  • source
  • [–] 23 points 2 weeks ago (7 children)
  • [–] 21 points 2 weeks ago

    There are literally open DNS providers who run their own networks. Good luck.

  • source
  • [–] 20 points 2 weeks ago (1 child)
    load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 18 points 1 week ago (3 children)

    Wait until critizism of The Glorious Party and Our Beloved Supreme Leader is considered "piracy".

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 27 points 1 week ago (1 child)

    We got a DNS-based censorship law in Denmark ages ago. It was strictly for blocking child pornography. Today the list also includes: Unlicensed gambling sites, piracy, as well as a handful of sites that "doesn't contain CSAM or other obviously illegal content" (old source, but nothing has really changed except probably the amount of websites on the list)

    Censorship will never be limited to what it was first set in motion for. It is just too powerful and it is too tempting to not expand it to cover other "nuisances" a government or its lobbyists might have. If the barrier of entry is just adding a new string to a list, they're gonna add that string to the list.

    And if you want to circumvent it you just point your DNS to Quad9, Cloudflare, Google, or any of the DNS services that doesn't implement the filter (including at least one Danish DNS service), so in essence it is pretty useless for the target groups it's meant for.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 17 points 2 weeks ago (5 children)
    load more comments (5 replies)
    [–] 15 points 2 weeks ago (6 children)

    Couldn’t you use a VPN to VPN to another country that doesn’t block piracy sites, then use a VPN to pirate?

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 14 points 2 weeks ago

    Oh look a distraction that also gets corporate donors. Its also divisive and gets people talking.

    Probably the most pressing issue of the day. Surely there is nothing else to work on.

  • source
  • load more comments
    view more: next ›