Xi about to infiltrate the entire US without lifting a finger. Dude just stuns Trump on sight because Trump's brain is just sex mush.
post
Imagine if this happened while Obama or Biden were in office.
Pointing out the GOPs constant hypocrisy doesn't even seem to matter anymore
The only thing that works on those cretins is shame. Shaming them for being deplorable beasts is the only way to get them to stop being amongst the most vile people on the planet.
yeah but obama wore a tan suit so it’s all square /s
The Chinese press probably has been ordered to flatter the witless trump.
So yes, of course they are let in.
Flattery gets you everywhere with Trump, so it makes sense they’d be told that. If they kiss his ass enough he’ll just give them Taiwan.
They are still in open contempt of the court order?
They will have to pretend to fall in line at some point then order the same thing another way, they aren't popular enough to totally ignore the courts. Not that they won't try.
... and Americans still won't even entertain the notion of a national strike as their country is flushed down the toilet
A national strike would probably be more palatable if there were trusted community organizations that could help the most vulnerable who can't go without pay, even for short periods. It doesn't just have to be cash they distribute, in-kind goods or services would be useful too.
This is what people mean when they say voting isn't enough to make meaningful change. Get to know your neighbors and take care of each other. The state is less scary when you have solidarity.
The German revolutions saw those things just taken and given to the people.
How long do you think a given Walmart could support people for?
The largest strike in the history of the USA was 70K people.
Why are you dreaming of magical solutions?
There have been national strikes in the world, like India, but the USA's standard of living is much too high for that. Nobody else has managed a national strike under similar conditions, it's unheard of. It's never been done.
Besides, your country is probably still using US dollars and accepting US aid, you can't even stop enabling the international beast yourselves. But you have to work and feed your family, we get it.
accepting US aid,
Jokes on you and the thousands of dead people from starvation and preventable diseasw. The Trump admin got rid of USAID and our other means of international aid have been significantly curtailed too.
We don't like each other enough. We see the government as a way to make other people angry.
We will deal with the problem when the water around us starts boiling I promise. In the meantime has anyone noticed it's feeling a bit warm in here?
I tuned into “ trump tv” where they were informing their audience that trumps farts cure cancer and that there is a convoy of trans gender Mexican mice headed for the border.
This is a conspiracy theory, but is it really so far-fetched to assume that the most powerful 1% of the populations are joining forces worldwide to establish something like a global feudal regime?
It’s entirely feasible, since we’re talking about just a few thousand people here.
In any case, these people have one thing in common: they view democracy as a problem. This applies to Trump just as much as it does to Putin and Jinping. The same goes for their henchmen, such as Merz in Germany, for example.
It’s not that unthinkable when you consider the fundamental idea behind fascism, as shaped by Mussolini in his day: a brotherhood of the elites striving for absolute rule.
It seems to me that this is now the agenda, especially since in the U.S., with the pseudo-intellectual concept of "Dark Enlightenment," there doesn’t even seem to be any attempt to hide it.
I'm not usually a fan of such ideas, but it does seem very, very suspicious to me, given that the leaders of the world's most powerful countries are apparently doing everything in their power to undo the civilizational progress of the last hundred years—and are clearly doing so in a fairly well-coordinated manner.
I’m not usually a fan of such ideas, but it does seem very, very suspicious to me, given that the leaders of the world’s most powerful countries are apparently doing everything in their power to undo the civilizational progress of the last hundred years—and are clearly doing so in a fairly well-coordinated manner.
Have you ever been close to the top of of a large organization? While conventional wisdom is that the higher you go, the more informed, skilled, coordinated, wise, and even Machiavellian it is. My experience is that its usually the opposite. Sure, there are pockets of those things in individual people, but the people at the top are usually really good at a few things only. If they're truly wise, they surround themselves with other people that cover their own gaps in knowledge, skill, temperament, etc. However the larger and more complicated the organization, the more outer rings of people are required with those other pockets of skills.
In short, complex organizations (this includes governments) are the opposite of " fairly well-coordinated manner". There are just too many moving parts and the environment changes so quickly that the rules that worked a second ago changed. Most successful organizations I've seen make "okay" decisions most of the time "good" decisions every now and then, and the best orgs do everything they can to limit their internal fuck ups.
The best vaccine against conspiracy theories about high groups of coordinated humans in leadership working against you is actually seeing humans in leadership trying to coordinate.
I’d be an idiot to say here what I do for a living, but yes, I regularly deal with CEOs -and it’s precisely this experience that makes it all the more likely to me that a conspiracy like the one mentioned above is underway. While I’m nowhere near that level, I’m still quite familiar with the politics in companies with 500 or more employees. For me, this is all the more reason to entertain such thoughts, because I know of hardly any company where performance or competence is even remotely appreciated. The people I know as “the decision-makers” should actually be the very last ones to make decisions—they’re self-absorbed, unscrupulous people.
I regularly deal with CEOs -and it’s precisely this experience that makes it all the more likely to me that a conspiracy like the one mentioned above is underway.
I'm confused by this statement. If you're familiar with the regular pockets of incompetence that is present in any leadership organization, what leads you to believe they would be successfully executing a broad coordinated conspiracy like this? I'm not suggesting its a lack of greed or narcissism at the top for them to try, but to actually succeed seems pretty unlikely to me.
top 50 comments