The American Copyright Protection Act aims to force ISPs, DNS resolvers, and VPNs to cut off access to foreign piracy sites

all 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 115 points 1 week ago (4 children)

So... they're gonna stop AI from doing it too... right?

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 75 points 1 week ago (3 children)

    No, specific IPs of AI companies are clear for doing this.

    Incoming IP spoofs of OpenAI in 3, 2, 1...

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 102 points 1 week ago (1 child)

    Ah, the party of small government. :|

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 98 points 1 week ago (6 children)

    Remember when piracy was shrinking and Netflix was cheap and had a good deal of content?

    Ah well, if only we can figure out what changed.

    I guess we'll instead try prohibiting VPNs, when something is in demand.. prohibiting it always works great with zero unintended consequences.

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 49 points 1 week ago (3 children)
  • [–] 4 points 1 week ago (2 children)

    Other P2P networks too.

    Long live to Soulseek, eMule/ed2k, IPFS, Iroh, Retroshare, Tox and the like.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 week ago

    When you only needed Netflix. Not Netflix, Hulu, Disney, HBO, Paramount, peacock, starz, apple, Amazon prime... I mean, I think most of us are fine paying for content. But, streaming has become at least as expensive as cable used to be.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 88 points 1 week ago (1 child)

    Nothing like passing legislation to force a collection of international communications protocols to ban sites the state doesn’t like….

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 58 points 1 week ago (1 child)

    God forbid some asshole isnt allowed to make a buck, lets hand over all our rights and privacy for the bottom line.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 54 points 1 week ago

    "Should we improve our services or at least stop screwing folks? Nah lets bribe the government"

  • source
  • [–] 45 points 1 week ago

    They'll really do anything to avoid making a better product, huh?

  • source
  • [–] 30 points 1 week ago

    They can't stop me. Who wants to join my private sharing network? Let's VPN it up.

  • source
  • [–] 29 points 1 week ago

    I guess it's inevitable that the USA must copy China's approach to managing the internet... the existential crises are reaching a breaking point

  • source
  • [–] 27 points 1 week ago* (7 children)

    Step 1: rent a $5 VPS anywhere outside of us government control.

    Step 2: set up a multi-hop tunnel through said VPS using glutun and wireguard.

    You are now immune to this bullshit.

    Lmao

  • source
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 1 week ago (4 children)

    Looks at the 99% who can't afford a VPS

    You're forgetting the most important thing

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 week ago* (1 child)

    avg comes with one. pita, sometimes it turns it on when i don't want to use it. I used to mess around with it because I got avg because my phone kept getting hacked and I was like this thing comes with a vpn!!!!!!!! whaaaaaaat but tbh I have no use for t so I don't even use it.

    ngl though, if i went out of the country and needed to access paypal instead of using zelle, id use it, other than that, it's annoying when i do a virus scan and it gets turned on after.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 24 points 1 week ago (2 children)
  • [–] 22 points 1 week ago

    These "small government conservatives" have been spineless for so long, it's hard to remember anyone ever made the claim!

  • source
  • [–] 15 points 1 week ago

    Make Domestic Piracy Great Again?

  • source
  • [–] 14 points 1 week ago (1 child)

    How does one set up a system to only connect through tor?

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 13 points 1 week ago

    Dear Government. Quit trying to turn the Internet into 1980s cable TV. There's a lot of us out here using it for its original purpose instead shopping and watching Netflix.

  • source
  • [–] 12 points 1 week ago

    Good thing my DNS resolver and VPN aren't american then huh?

    I wish I could buy the Chinese competitor to Starlink and use it just so I could break even further away from all the surveillance. I'd never be able to afford a visit to China so why would I care?

  • source
  • [–] 11 points 1 week ago

    Darrell Issa is and has been a miserable piece of shit for far too long.

  • source
  • [–] 11 points 1 week ago (1 child)

    Not enforceable, what will they do about offshore VPNs? Many major VPN companies are already based outside of the US

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 5 points 1 week ago

    It's messy.

    At this very moment, it would be very hard to enforce.

    In the spirit of what they're trying to do, I worry they'll modify the law "ISPs are required to do state-full inspection of all traffic and block anything questionable."

    You might say, that's not doable, what about SSL? ISP's enforce a MITM cert. Bluecoat has devices that have done this for years. Essentially dismantle internet security altogether. HSTS? Not if the feds so no. If they're mandated by law the ISPs would comply and we'd not be left with any other opportunity.

    But what if it's encrypted below that level? Easy, Block. If your business needs VPN, they register their endpoint and provide backdoor keys/logs.

    We're not there. Not by a long shot, but we're heading that way and they're pumping the gas as hard as they can.

    None of this privacy we're enjoying is durable. Pushes in the US, UK, AUS and other places are trying to dismantle it.

    If we don't put up a fight, we'd better start working a fuck of a lot harder on radio meshes.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 9 points 1 week ago (1 child)

    So this would apply to all vpn servers in usa?

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 7 points 1 week ago
    [–] 5 points 1 week ago*

    Can’t wait for this to get applied to every corporate site-to-site VPN, every remote worker, etc. My employer relies heavily on VPN services provided by AWS. I’d be willing to bet the number of corporate users of AWS VPN users would be enough to qualify for this.

  • source
  • [–] 5 points 1 week ago

    So employees that use a company VPN to access company files between offices are now breaking the law?

    What about personal vpns that people setup to access their home devices, like a smart home setup or home security camera? Illegal as well?

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 1 week ago
    [–] 3 points 1 week ago (1 child)