this post was submitted on 19 Jun 2025
106 points (92.1% liked)

World News

47617 readers
2373 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Russia wants to end the war in Ukraine "as soon as possible," preferably through peaceful means, and is ready to continue negotiations — provided that Kyiv and its Western allies are willing to engage, Vladimir Putin said.

Speaking during a roundtable with top editors of major international news agencies late on June 18, Putin added that he is ready to meet with Volodymyr Zelensky and "Russia does not care who represents Ukraine in negotiations, but insists that any final agreement must bear the signature of legitimate authorities."

The Kremlin has long sought to portray Zelensky as "illegitimate" in an attempt to discredit Kyiv. Kremlin spokesperson Dmitry Peskov said on Feb. 18 that Putin, who has ruled Russia for over 20 years, is ready for talks with Zelensky, but "legal aspects related to his legitimacy" must be considered.

Ukraine's allies had generally ignored this propaganda narrative until Donald Trump appeared to echo the Kremlin's lines claiming that Zelensky was a "modestly successful comedian" turned "dictator" who "refused to have elections."

top 21 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Jimmycakes@lemmy.world 2 points 10 hours ago

Ukraine has so many more drone bombs be a shame to waste them let's do a few more months of attacks first

[–] Buddahriffic@lemmy.world 12 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

Feels kinda like a game of crusader kings iii where you've gained some territory but worry that your opponent's allies might send a large army at any time, plus your vassals are rumbling about revolt, so you want to get that war finished asap but don't have enough of an advantage to force them to accept your terms.

Except it's OK when it's crusader kings because that's just a fucking video game and people aren't really dying on both sides for your ego or power hungry imperial bullshit.

[–] ksigley@lemm.ee 4 points 15 hours ago

War never changes.

[–] palordrolap@fedia.io 16 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

Do you remember that episode of The Simpsons where Homer has his arm stuck in a drink vending machine and it becomes clear that he would have been free if only he'd let go of the soda can inside it? And everyone laughs at him?

Here we see "Homer" Putin with his army stuck in a war holding onto a Ukraine. He even has the same haircut. D'oh!

[–] foggenbooty@lemmy.world 4 points 14 hours ago

That's a bang on analogy.

[–] EvilBit@lemmy.world 39 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

My Russian is rusty, but here’s a rough translation: “We invaded Ukraine and have had our asses kicked thoroughly and dramatically, but we would still like to win and take a bunch of their territory.”

I might have missed a conjugation or two.

[–] WanderingThoughts 8 points 18 hours ago

but we would still like to win and take a bunch of their territory

Putin had to. If the war ends with nothing to show for it, it's his turn to poison himself out of a window.

[–] A_norny_mousse@feddit.org 57 points 23 hours ago

Kremlin spokesperson Dmitry Peskov said on Feb. 18 that Putin, who has ruled Russia for over 20 years, is ready for talks with Zelensky, but “legal aspects related to his legitimacy” must be considered.

I agree. 20 years is way too long; something is fishy.

[–] BigMikeInAustin@lemmy.world 19 points 20 hours ago

Putin can immediately end it with just one word: retreat.

[–] card797@champserver.net 13 points 20 hours ago
[–] EndlessNightmare@reddthat.com 11 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

Russia could simply stop attacking at any time, yes? Or at least they could have, not sure if Ukraine would back off at this point given how long this has dragged on.

Oh, but that isn't what they actually want.

[–] gloriousspearfish@feddit.dk 3 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

If Russia withdraw out of Ukraine, and stop attacking, the war will end immediately. Russia have always had the option of stopping the war, they just choose not to.

[–] shalafi@lemmy.world 3 points 14 hours ago

Stopping is no longer an option unless Putin wants to crash the Russian economy.

[–] A_norny_mousse@feddit.org 26 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 23 hours ago) (1 children)

provided that Kyiv and its Western allies are willing to engage

Read: provided they agree to our demands

And even if: Russia has already broken international treaties. Why should it be different this time?

[–] supersquirrel@sopuli.xyz 14 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 23 hours ago)

Because Russia is decisively losing now and is unable to take new territory and hold it.

https://m.youtube.com/@suchomimus9921

[–] NotAGamer@lemmy.org 21 points 22 hours ago* (last edited 22 hours ago)

"I'll stop (for now) if you just let me win."

[–] Buffalox@lemmy.world 27 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

"Russia does not care who represents Ukraine in negotiations, but insists that any final agreement must bear the signature of legitimate authorities."

No doubt Zelensky is the legitimate leader of Ukraine, but who does he imagine should sign for Russia?

But honestly Putin can piss off with his constant ridiculous preconditions. Although of course that's up to Ukraine to decide.
But I don't blame them if they just send him this response: 🖕

[–] Vopyr@lemmy.world 19 points 21 hours ago* (last edited 21 hours ago)

The best response to anything they say or offer is the middle finger. If they want peace, they should get the fuck out of our lands and not come to us from their swamp in the future, but we are well aware that they do not want peace, they want to take as much Ukrainian land as possible, or even the whole of Ukraine.

By the way, he doesn't care? Damn nonsense, after we kicked Yanukovych out of our country (or rather, he fled like the beaten, whiney removed that he is, Putin's removed), Putin and the rest of Russia started saying in unison that Poroshenko (and later Zelensky) were “not legitimate” presidents, although they are of course quite legitimate, because it is up to the Ukrainian people to choose, not Russia.

[–] cheese_greater@lemmy.world 7 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago)

Art of the deal strikes again, Fuck off puts. They should demand Putin be exiled to China or some shit. Assad has to stay there or be handed over to ICC

[–] Hoohoo@fedia.io 9 points 22 hours ago

Has anyone considered Putin might simply be a compulsive liar, but for some strange reason it's not recognised in Russia?

[–] Vopyr@lemmy.world 5 points 21 hours ago